Multiple-version resources in digital libraries: Towards user-centered displays

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 57, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1023-1032

  Ercegovac, Zorana ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC ENTITIES; INTERRELATED CLUSTERS; NAVIGATIONAL CAPABILITY; NETWORKED DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

BIBLIOGRAPHIC RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; DISPLAY DEVICES; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 33745631529     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20367     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbott, E.A. (1884). Flatland: A romance of many dimensions. London: Seeley.
2. Allen, T.J. (1979). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the research and development organizations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. American Library Association. (2002). Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (2nd ed., 2002 rev.). Chicago: ALA, Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR.
4. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Special Interest Group on Management of Data (SIGMOD). (n.d.). Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://www. acm.org/sigmod/
5. Bates, M.J. (2003). Supporting the digital library user through information design devices. Paper presented at the Bicentennial Conference on Bibliographic Control for the New Millennium: Confronting the Challenges of Networked Resources and the Web (Sponsored by the Library of Congress Cataloging Directorate. Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan). Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/actionplan.html
6. Bennett, R., Lavoie, B.F., & O'Neill, E.T. (2003). The concept of a work in WorldCat: An application of FRBR. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 27, 45-59.
7. Buckland, M.K., Norgard, B.A., & Plaunt, C. (1993). Filing, filtering, and the first few found. Information Technology and Libraries, 12, 311-19.
8. Card, S.K., Newell, A., & Moran, T.P. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interface. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Carlyle, A. (1996). Ordering author and work records: An evaluation of collocation in online catalog displays. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47, 538-554.
10. Carlyle, A. (1997). Fulfilling the second objective in the online catalog: Schemes for organizing author and work records into usable displays. Library Resources & Technical Services, 41, 79-100.
11. Carlyle, A. (1999). User categorization of works: Toward improved organization of online catalogue displays. Journal of Documentation, 55, 184-208.
12. Carlyle, A. (2001). Developing organized information displays for voluminous works: A study of user clustering behavior. Information Processing & Management, 37, 677-99.
13. Carlyle, A., & Summerlin, J. (2002). Transforming catalog displays: Record clustering for works of fiction. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 33, 13-25.
14. Chien, S.-Y., Tsotras, V.J., & Zaniolo, C. (2002, March). Efficient complex query support for multiversion XML documents. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT 2002,), Prague, Czech Republic.
15. Ercegovac, Z. (1998). Minimal level cataloging: What does it mean for maps in the contexts of card catalogs, online catalogs, and digital libraries? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 706-19.
16. Ercegovac, Z. (Guest Ed.). (1999). Introduction, special topic issue: Integrating multiple overlapping metadata standards [Special issue]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50, 1165-1168.
17. Ercegovac, Z. (2000, November). Toward a global access to bibliographic information: Convergingpatterns,newparadigms.COBISSObvestila, 5, 4-28. Retrieved July, 15,2004,fromhttp://www.cs.ucla.edu/Leap/zer/maribor.htm
18. Ercegovac, Z. (2001). Accessing engineering information for engineers: Phase 2. In E. Aversa & C. Manly (Eds.), Proceedings of the 64th American Society for Information Science and Technology Annual Meeting, Information in a Networked World: Harnessing the Flow (411-424). Silver Spring, MD: American Society for Information Science and Technology.
19. Garvey, W.D. (1979). Communication: The essence of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
20. Graham, C. (1990). Definition and scope of multiple versions. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 11, 5-32.
21. Hickey, T.B., O'Neill, E.T., & Toves, J. (2002). Experiments with the IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). D-Lib Magazine, 8(9). Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://www.dlib.org/ september02/ hickey/09hickey.html
22. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). (1998). Functional requirements for bibliographic records: Final report (UBCIM Publications, New Series Vol. 19). Munich: K.G. Saur.
23. IFLA Working Group on Content Designators. (1980). UNIMARC: Universal MARC Format (2nd ed.) London: IFLA International Office.
24. Lagoze, C., & Hunter, J. (2001). The ABC ontology and model. Journal of Digital Information. Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://jodi.ecs.soton. ac.uk/Articles/ v02/i02/Lagoze/
25. Leazer, G., & Fumer, J. (1999). Topological indices of textual identity networks. In L. Woods (Ed.), Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science (pp. 345-358). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
26. Library of Congress Cataloging Directorate. (2003, December). Papers presented at the Bicentennial Conference on Bibliographic Control for the New Millennium. Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://www.loc.gov/ catdir/bibcontrol/ actionplan.html
27. Library of Congress Network Development and MARC Standards Office. (2002). Displays for multiple versions from MARC 21 and FRBR. Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://www.loc.gov/marc/marc-functionalanalysis/ multiple-versions.html
28. Lubetzky, S. (1969). Principles of cataloging. Phase 1, Descriptive cataloging. Final report. Los Angeles: Institute of Library Research, University of California.
29. Lynch, C., & Garcia-Molina, H. (1995, May). Interoperability, scaling, and the digital libraries research agenda: A report. Paper presented at the IITA Digital Libraries Workshop. Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://www-diglib.standford.edu/diglib/pub/reports/iita-dlw/main.html
30. Matthews, J.R., Lawrence, G.S., & Ferguson, D.K. (1983). Using online catalogs. New York: Neal Schumann.
31. Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
32. O'Neill, E.T., & Vizine-Goetz, D. (1989). Bibliographic relationships: Implications for the function of the catalog. In E. Svenonius (Ed.), The conceptual foundations of descriptive cataloging (pp. 167-179). San Diego: Academic Press.
33. Riva, P. (2004). Mapping MARC 21 linking entry fields to FRBR and Tillett's taxonomy of bibliographic relationships. Library Resources & Technical Services, 48, 130-143.
34. Smiraglia, R.P. (1992). Authority control and the extent of derivative bibliographic relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate Library School, University of Chicago.
35. Smiraglia, R.P. (1994). Derivative bibliographic relationships: Linkages in the bibliographic universe. In D.L. Andersen, T.J. Galvin, & M.D. Giguerre (eds.), Navigating the networks. Proceedings of the ASIS Mid-Year Meeting (pp. 167-183). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.
36. Smiraglia, R.P. (2002). Further reflections on the nature of 'A Work': An introduction. In R.P. Smiraglia (Ed.), Works as entities for information retrieval (pp. 1-11). New York: Scarecrow Press.
37. Smiraglia, R.P., & Leazer, G.H. (1999). Derivative bibliographic relationships: The work relationship in a global bibliographic database. Journal of the American Society and Information Science, 50, 493-504.
38. Svenonius, E. (2000). The intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Tillett, B.A.B. (1987). Bibliographic relationships: Toward a conceptual structure of bibliographic information used in cataloging. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of California, Los Angeles.
40. Tillett, B.A.B. (1992a). Bibliographic relationships: An empirical study of the LC machine-readable records. Library Resources & Technical Services, 36, 162-88.
41. Tillet, B.A.B. (1992b). The history of linking devices. Library Resources & Technical Services, 36, 23-36.
42. Tillett, B.A.B. (1997, March/April). International shared resource file: From authority control to access control. Paper presented at the Authority Control in the Twenty-First Century: An Invitational Conference. Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://oclc.org/oclc/man/authconf/ confhome.htm
43. Tillett, B.A.B. (2001). Bibliographic relationships. In C.A. Bean & R. Green (Eds), Relationships in the organization of knowledge (pp. 19-35). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
44. Vellucci, S.L. (1995). Bibliographic relationships among musical bibliographic entities: A conceptual analysis of music represented in a library catalog with a taxonomy of the relationships discovered. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
45. Verona, E. (1959). Literary unit versus bibliographic unit. Libri, 9, 79-104.
46. Wiberley, S.E. Jr., Daugherty, R.A., & Danowski, J.A. (1995). User persistence in displaying online catalog postings: LUIS. Library Resources & Technical Services, 39, 247-264.
47. Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographic control. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
48. Yee, M.M. (1998). What is a work? In J. Weihs (Ed.), The principles and future of AACR: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR (pp. 62-104). Ottawa: Canadian Library Association.