Fundamental forms of information

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 57, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1033-1045

  Bates, Marcia J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBODIED INFORMATION; INFORMATION GENRES; INFORMATION-SEEKING BEHAVIOR; TRACE INFORMATION;

EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); INFORMATION SCIENCE; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 33745609003     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20369     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bates, M.J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1043-1050.
2. Bates, M.J. (2005). Information and knowledge: An evolutionary framework for information science. Information Research, 10(4). Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/
3. Bates, M.J., & Lu, S. (1997). Exploratory profile of personal home pages: Content, design, metaphors. Online & CDROM Review, 21(6), 331-340.
4. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
5. Baumard, P. (1999). Tacit knowledge in organizations. London: Sage.
6. Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation, Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021-1046.
7. Blumentritt, R., & Johnston, R. (1999). Towards a strategy for knowledge management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(3), 287-300.
8. Brier, S. (1996). Cybersemiotics: A new interdisciplinary development applied to the problems of knowledge organisation and document retrieval in information science. Journal of Documentation, 52(3), 296-344.
9. Brookes, B.C. (1975). The fundamental problem of information science. In V. Horsnell (Ed.), Informatics 2: Proceedings of a Conference Held by the ASLIB Coordinate Indexing Group (pp. 42-49). London: ASLIB.
10. Brunk, B. (2001). Exoinformation and interface design. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 27(6), 11-13.
11. Chalmers, D.J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Chandler, D. (2004, August), Semiotics for beginners. Retrieved January 6, 2005. from http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem02.html
13. Collins, H.M. (1996). Embedded or embodied? A review of Hubert Dreyfus' what computers still can't do. Artificial Intelligence, 80(1), 99-117.
14. Crowston, K., & Williams, M. (2000). Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the World Wide Web. The Information Society, 16(3), 201-215.
15. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. San Diego: Harcourt.
16. Davenport, T.H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
17. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The long reach of the gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Dennett, D.C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown.
20. Encyclopaedia Britannica, (n.d.). Semiotics, Encyclopaedia Britannica online. Retrieved November 4, 2004, from http://www.britannica.com
21. Goonatilake, S. (1991). The evolution of information: Lineages in gene, culture and artefact. London: Pinter.
22. Havelock, E.A. (1980). The coming of literate communication to western culture. Journal of Communication, 30(1), 90-98.
23. Heilprin, L.B., & Goodman, F.L. (1965). Analogy between information retrieval and education. In L.B. Heilprin, B.E. Markuson, & F.L. Goodman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Education for Information Science (pp. 13-21). London: Macmillan.
24. Hjørland, B. (2002). Principia informatica: Foundational theory of information and principles of information services. In H. Bruce, R. Fidel, P. Ingwersen, & P. Vakkari (Eds.), Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4) (pp. 109-121). Greenwood Village, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
25. Hoffmeyer, J. (1997). The global semiosphere. In I. Rauch, & G.F. Carr (Eds.), Semiotics around the world. Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (pp. 933-936). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Retrieved August 13, 2004, from http://www.molbio.ku.dk/molbiopages/abk/personalpages/jesper/Semiosphere.html
26. Hoopes, J. (Ed.). (1991). Peirce on signs; Writings on semiotic by Charles Sanders Peirce. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
27. Houghton Mifflin. (2000). American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th ed.). Boston: Author.
28. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Ingarden, R. (1989). Ontology of the work of art: The musical work, the picture, the architectural work, the film. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
30. Lidov, D. (1998). Semiosis. In P. Bouissac (Ed.), Encyclopedia of semiotics (pp. 561-563). New York: Oxford University Press.
31. McCauley, R.N. (Ed.). (1996). The Churchlands and their critics. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
32. Ong, W.J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.
33. Parker, E.B. (1974). Information and society. In C.A. Cuadra & M.J. Bates (Eds.), Library and information service needs of the nation: Proceedings of a Conference on the Needs of Occupational, Ethnic, and other Groups in the United States (pp. 9-50). Washington. DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34. Random House. (1993). Random House Unabridged Dictionary (2nd ed.). New York: Author.
35. Swanson, C.P. (1983). Ever-expanding horizons: The dual informational sources of human evolution. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
36. Taborsky, E. (n.d.). Semiosis, semiosis/evolution/energy terminology. Retrieved May 12, 2005, from http://www.library.utoronto.ca/see/pages/semiosisdef.html
37. Trosborg, A. (Ed.). (2000). Analysing professional genres (Pragmatics and Beyond: New Series, Vol. 74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
38. Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1993). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
39. Vaughan, M.W., & Dillon, A. (1998). The role of genre in shaping our understanding of digital documents. In C.M. Preston (Ed.), Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science (Vol. 35, pp. 559-566). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
40. White, H.D. (1992). External memory. In H.D. White, M.J. Bates, & P. Wilson (Eds.), For information specialists: Interpretations of reference and bibliographic work (pp. 249-294). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
41. Wiener, N. (1961). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
42. Wilkinson, R.H. (1994). Symbol & magic in Egyptian art. New York: Thames and Hudson.
43. Wilson, P., & Robinson, N. (1990). Form subdivisions and genre. Library Resources & Technical Services, 34(1), 36-43.