Benefits and costs of floral visitors to Chilopsis linearis: Pollen deposition and stigma closure

Oikos

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 363-375

  Richardson, Sarah C ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; FLOWER VISITING; MUTUALISM; POLLINATOR;

ANIMALIA; APIDAE; APIS; APIS MELLIFERA; BOMBUS SONORUS; CHILOPSIS; CHILOPSIS LINEARIS; HYMENOPTERA; SALIX;

EID: 5144235210     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12504.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alexander, M. P. 1980. A versatile stain for pollen, fungi, yeast, and bacteria. - Stain Tech. 55: 13-18.
2. Bertin, R. I. 1982. Floral biology, hummingbird pollination, and fruit production of trumpet creeper, Campsis radicans (Bignoniaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 69: 122-134.
3. Bronstein, J. L. 1994. Our current understanding of mutualism. - Q. Rev. Biol. 69: 31-51.
4. Bronstein, J. L. 2001. The costs of mutualism. - Am. Zool. 41: 825-839.
5. Bull, J. J. and Rice, W. R. 1991. Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation. - J. Theor. Biol. 149: 63-74.
6. Bultman, T., Welch, A., Boning, R. A. et al. 2000. The cost of mutualism in a fly-fungus interaction. - Oecologia 124: 85-90.
7. Dafni, A. 1992. Pollination ecology. - Oxford Univ. Press.
8. Fetscher, A. 2001. Resolution of male-female conflict in an hermaphroditic flower. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 525-529.
9. Fishbein, M. and Venable, D. L. 1996. Diversity and temporal change in the effective pollinators of Asclepias tuberosa. - Ecology 77: 1061-1073.
10. Gentry, A. H. 1974. Coevolutionary patterns in Central American Bignoniaceae. - MO Bot. Gard. Ann. 61: 728-759.
11. Herrera, C. M. 1987. Components of pollinator "quality": comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. - Oikos 50: 79-90.
12. Herrera, C. M. 1988. Variation in mutualisms: the spatio-temporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 35: 95-125.
13. Irwin, R. E., Brody, A. K. and Waser, N. M. 2001. The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities. - Oecologia 129: 161-168.
14. Janzen, D. H. 1979. How many babies do figs pay for babies? - Biotropica 11: 48-50.
15. Johnson, S. D. and Steiner, K. E. 2000. Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 140-143.
16. Keeler, D. 1985. Cost:benefit models of mutualism. - In: Boucher, D. H. (ed.), The Biology of mutualism. Croom Helm, pp. 100-127.
17. Letourneau, D. K. 1991. Parasitism of ant-plant mutualisms and the novel case of Piper. - In: Huxley, C. R. and Cutler, D. R. (eds), Ant-plant interactions. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 390-396.
18. McDade, L. A. and Kinsman, S. 1980. The impact of floral parasitism in two neotropical hummingbird-pollinated plant species. - Evolution 34: 944-958.
19. Maloof, J. E. and Inouye, D. W. 2000. Are nectar-robbers cheaters or mutualists? - Ecology 81: 2651-2661.
20. Morris, W. F. 1996. Mutualism denied? Nectar-robbing bumble bees do not reduce female or male success of bluebells. - Ecology 77: 1451-1462.
21. Motten, A. F., Campbell, D. R. and Alexander, D. E. 1981. Pollination effectiveness of specialist and generalist visitors to a North Carolina population of Claytonia virginica. - Ecology 62: 1278-1287.
22. Newcombe, F. C. 1924. Significance of the behavior of sensitive stigmas II. - Am. J. Bot. 11: 85-93.
23. Olsen, K. M. 1997. Pollination effectiveness and pollinator importance in a population of Heterotheca subaxillaris (Asteraceae). - Oecologia 109: 114-121.
24. Pellmyr, O. 1997. Stability of plant-animal mutualisms: keeping the benefactors at bay. - Trends Plant Sci. 2: 408-409.
25. Petersen, C., Brown, J. H. and Kodric-Brown, A. 1982. An experimental study of floral display and fruit set in Chilopsis linearis (Bignoniaceae). - Oecologia 55: 7-11.
26. Pettersson, M. W. 1991. Pollination by a guild of fluctuating moth populations: options for unspecialization in Silene vulgaris. - J. Ecol. 79: 591-604.
27. Richardson, S. C. 2004. Are nectar-robbers mutualists or antagonists? - Oecologia 139: 246-254.
28. Richardson, S. C. 1995. Temporal variation in pollinator abundance and pollinator foraging behavior in response to robbed flowers. - In: DeBano, L. F., Ffolliott, P. F., Ortega-Rubio, A. et al. (eds), Biodiversity and management of the madrean archipelago: the Sky Islands of southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico, Tucson, Arizona. USDA Forest Service, pp. 311-316.
29. Schemske, D. W. and Horvitz, C. 1984. Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization. - Science 225: 519-521.
30. Templeton, A. R. and Gilbert, L. E. 1985. Population genetics and the coevolution of mutualism. - In: Boucher, D. H. (ed.), The biology of mutualism. Croom Helm, pp. 128-144.
31. Thieret, J. W. 1976. Floral biology of Proboscidea louisianica (Martyniaceae). - Rhodora 78: 169-179.
32. Trivers, R. L. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. - Q. Rev. Biol. 46: 35-57.
33. Turner, R. M., Bowers, J. E. and Burgess, T. L. 1995. Sonoran Desert plants: an ecological atlas. - Univ. of Arizona Press.
34. Wagner, D. 2000. Pollen viability reduction as a potential cost of ant association for Acacia constricta (Fabaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 87: 711-715.
35. Waser, N. M. 1979. Pollinator availability as a determinant of flowering time in Ocotillo (Fouquieria splendens). - Oecologia 39: 107-121.
36. Waser, N. M. and Fugate, M. L. 1986. Pollen precedence and stigma closure: a mechanism of competition for pollination between Delphinium nelsonii and Ipomopsis aggregata. - Oecologia 70: 573-577.
37. Waser, N. and Price, M. 1990. Pollination efficiency and effectiveness of bumble bees and hummingbirds visiting Delphinium nelsonii. - Collectanea Bot. (Barcelona) 19: 9-20.
38. Waser, N., Chittka, L., Price, M. et al. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. - Ecology 77: 1043-1060.
39. Westerbergh, A. and Westerbergh, J. 2001. Interactions between seed predators/pollinators and their host plants: a first step towards mutualism? - Oikos 95: 324-334.
40. Whitham, T. G. 1977. Coevolution of foraging in Bombus and nectar dispensing in Chilopsis: a last dreg theory. - Science 197: 593-596.
41. Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. - Prentice-Hall, Inc.
42. Ziv, Y. and Bronstein, J. L. 1996. Infertile seeds of Yucca schottii: a beneficial role for the plant in the yucca-yucca moth mutualism? - Evol. Ecol. 10: 63-76.