The costs of mutualism

American Zoologist

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 825-839

  Bronstein, Judith L ^a  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746029457     PISSN: 00031569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/41.4.825     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Addicott, J. F. 1986. Variation in the costs and benefits of mutualism: The interaction between yuccas and yucca moths. Oecologia 70:486-494.
2. Addicott, J. F. and T. Bao. 1999. Limiting the costs of mutualism: Multiple modes of interaction between yuccas and yucca moths. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. B 266:197-202.
3. Aizen, M. A. and P. Feinsinger. 1994. Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology 75:330-351.
4. Anstett, M.-C., J. L. Bronstein, and M. HossaertMcKey. 1996. Resource allocation: A conflict in the fig/fig wasp mutualism? J. Evol. Biol. 9:417-426.
5. Anstett, M. C., M. Hossaert-McKey, and F. Kjellberg. 1997. Figs and fig pollinators: Evolutionary conflicts in a coevolved mutualism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:94-99.
6. Armbruster, W. S. and B. G. Baldwin. 1998. Switch from specialized to generalized pollination. Nature 394:632.
7. Axén, A. H. and N. E. Pierce. 1998. Aggregation as a cost-reducing strategy for lycaenid larvae. Behav. Ecol. 9:109-115.
8. Boucher, D. H., S. James and K. H. Keeler. 1982. The ecology of mutualism. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13: 315-347.
9. Bronstein, J. L. 1988. Mutualism, antagonism, and the fig-pollinator interaction. Ecology 69:1298-1302.
10. Bronstein, J. L. 1992. Seed predators as mutualists: Ecology and evolution of the fig/pollinator interaction. In E. Bernays (ed.), Insect-plant interactions, Vol. IV, pp. 1-44. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
11. Bronstein, J. L. 1994a. Our current understanding of mutualism. Q. Rev. Biol. 69:31-51.
12. Bronstein, J. L. 1994fr. Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:214217.
13. Bronstein, J. L. 1999. The biology of Anidarnes hi-color (Hymenoptera, Agaonidae, Sycophaginae), a galler of Ficus aiirea. Florida Ent. 82:454-461.
14. Bronstein, J. L. 2001n. Mutualisms. In C. Fox, D. Fairbairn, and D. Roff (eds.), Evolutionary ecologyPerspectives and synthesis. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (In press)
15. Bronstein, J. L. 200b. The exploitation of mutualisms. Ecol. Lett. 4:277-287.
16. Bronstein, J. L. and M. Hossaert-McKey. 1995. Hurricane Andrew and a Florida figîpollination mutualism: Resilience of an obligatev'mutualism. Biotropica 27:373-381.
17. Bronstein, J. L. and M. Hossaert-McKey. 1996. Variation in reproductive success within a subtropical fig/pollinator mutualism. J. Biogeogr. 23:433-446.
18. Bronstein, J. L., D. Vernet, and M. Hossaert-McKey. 1998. Do fig wasps interfere with each other during oviposition? Ent. Exp. Appl. 87:321-324.
19. Bultman, T. L., A. M. Welch, R. A. Boning, and T. I. " Bovvdish. 2000. The cost of mutualism in a flyfungus interaction. Oecologia 124:85-90.
20. Compton, S. G., J.-Y. Rasplus, and A. B. Ware. 1994. ' African fig wasp parasitoid communities. In B. A. Hawkins and W. Sheehan (eds.), Parasitoid community ecology, pp. 343-348. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. Cook, J. M. and S. A. Power. 1996. Effects of withintree flowering asynchrony on the dynamics of seed and wasp production in an Australian fig species. J. Biogeogr. 23:487-493.
22. Corlett, R. T., V. Boudville, and K. Sect. 1990. Seed and wasp production in five fig species. Malayan Nat. J. 44:97-102.
23. Denison, R. F. 2000. Legume sanctions and the evolution of symbiotic cooperation by rhizobia. Am. Nat. 156:567-576.
24. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
25. Fleming, T. H. and J. N. Holland. 1998. The evolution of obligate pollination mutualisms: Senita cactus and senita moth. Oecologia 114:368-375.
26. Frank, S. A. 1996. Host-symbiont conflict over the mixing of symbiotic lineages. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263:339-344.
27. Ganeshaiah, K. N., P. Kathuria, R. U. Shaanker and R. Vasudeva. 1995. Evolution of style-length variability in figs and optimization of ovipositor length in their pollinator wasps: A coevolutionary model. J. Genet. 74:25-39.
28. Harder, L. D. and S. C. H. Barrett. 1992. The energy cost of bee pollination for Pontederia cordata (Pontederiaceae). Funct. Ecol. 6:226-233.
29. Harvey, P. H. and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
30. Hemborg, A. M. and L. Deprés. 1999. Oviposition by mutualistic seed-parasitic pollinators and its effects on annual fitness of single- and multi-flowered host plants. Oecologia 120:427-436.
31. Herre, E. A. 1985. Sex ratio adjustment in fig wasps. Science 228:896-898.
32. Herre, E. A. 1989. Coevolution of reproductive char-acteristics in 12 species of New World figs and their pollinator wasps. Experientia 45:637-646.
33. Herre, E. A. 1999. Laws governing species interactions? Encouragement and caution from figs and their associates. In L. Keller (ed.), Levels of selection in evolution, pp. 209-237. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
34. Herre, E. A. and S. A. West. 1997. Conflict of interest in a mutualism: Documenting the elusive fig wasp-seed tradeoff. Proc. Royal Soc. London Sen B 264:1501-1507.
35. Herre, E. A., N. Knowlton, U. G. Mueller, and S. A. Rehner. 1999. The evolution of mutualisms: Exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:49-53.
36. Holland, J. N. 2001. Mutualism between senita cacti and senita moths: Benefits, costs, and population dynamics. Ph.D. Diss., Department of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.
37. Holland, J. N. and T. H. Fleming. 1999. Geographic and population variation in pollinating seed-consuming interactions between senita cacti (Lophocereus schottii) and senita moths (Upiga virescens). Oecologia 121:405-410.
38. Hossaert-McKey, M. and J. L. Bronstein. 2001. Selfpollination and its costs in a monoecious fig (Ficus atirea, Moraceae) in a highly seasonal subtropical environment. Am. J. Bot. 88:685-692.
39. Irwin, R. E. and A. K. Brody. 1998. Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: Effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness. Oecologia 116:519-527.
40. Jaeger, N., I. Till-Bottraud, and L. Després. 2000. Evolutionary conflict between Trollius europaciis and its seed-parasite pollinators Chiastocheta flies. Evol. Ecol. Res. 2:885-896.
41. Janzen, D. H. 1979. How many babies do figs pay for babies? Biotropica 11:48-50.
42. Janzen, D. H. 1985. The natural history of mutualisms. In D. H. Boucher (éd.). The biology of mutualism, pp. 40-99. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
43. Johnson, N. C., J. H. Graham, and F. A. Smith. 1997. Functioning of mycorrhizal associations along the mutualism-parasitism continuum. New Phyt. 135: 575-585.
44. Jousselin, E. and F. Kjellberg. 2001. The functional implications of active and passive pollination in dioecious figs. Ecol. Lett. 4:151-158.
45. Keeler, K. H. 1985. Cost: benefit models of mutualism. In D. H. Boucher (éd.), The biology of mutualism, pp. 100-127. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
46. Keeley, J. E., S. C. Keeley, C. C. Swift, and J. Lee. 1984. Seed prédation due to the Yucca-moth symbiosis. Am. Midi. Nat. 112:187-191.
47. Keeley, J. E., S. C. Keeley, and D. A. Ikeda. 1986. Seed prédation by yucca moths on semelparous, iteroparous, and vegetatively reproducing subspecies of Yucca whipplei. Am. Midi. Nat. 115:1-9.
48. Kerdelhué, C. and J.-Y. Rasplus.:1996. Non-pollinating Afrotropical fig wasps affect the fig-pollinator mutualism in Ficus within the subgenus Sycomorus. Oikos 75:3-14.
49. Nefdt, R. J. C. and S. G. Compton. 1996. Regulation of seed and pollinator production in the fig-fig wasp mutualism. J. Animal Ecol. 65:170-182.
50. Noë, R. and P. Hammerstein. 1994. Biological markets: Supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35:1-11.
51. O'Dowd, D. J. 1979. Foliar nectar production and ant activity on a neotropical tree, Ochroma pyramidale. Oecologia 43:233-248.
52. O'Dowd, D. J. 1980. Pearl bodies of a neotropical tree, Ochroma pyramidale: Ecological implications. Am. J. Bot. 67:543-549. .'
53. Offenberg, J. 2001. Balancing between mutualism and exploitation: The symbiotic interaction between Lasius ants and aphids. Behav. Eco. Sociobiol. 49: 304-310.
54. Patel, A., M.-C. Anstett, M. Hossaert-McKey, and F. Kjellberg. 1995. Pollinators entering female dioecious figs: Why commit suicide? J. Evol. Biol. 8:301-313.
55. Pellmyr, O. 1989. The cost of mutualism: Interactions between Trollius europaeus and its pollinating parasités. Oecologia 78:53-59.
56. Pellmyr, O. 1997. Pollinating seed-eaters: Why is active pollination so rare? Ecology 78:1655-1660.
57. Pellmyr, O. and C. J. Huth. 1994. Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths. Nature 372:257-260.
58. Pellmyr, O. and J. Leebens-Mack. 2000. Reversal of mutualism as a mechanism for adaptive radiation in yucca moths. Am. Nat. 156:545-561.
59. Pettersson, M. W. 1991. Flower herbivory and seed prédation in Silène vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae): Effects of pollination and phenology. Holarctic Ecol. 14:45-50.
60. Rathcke, B. J. 1992. Nectar distributions, pollinator behavior, and reproductive success. In M. D. Hunter, T. Ohgashi, and P. W. Price (eds.), Effects of re-source dislribiition on animal-plant interactions, pp. 113-138. Academic Press, New York.
61. Roughgarden, J. 1975. Evolution of marine symbiosis-a simple cost-benefit model. Ecology 56: 1201-1208. ,
62. Schwanz, M. W. and J. D. Hoeksema. 1998. Specialization and resource trade: Biological markets as a model of mutualisms. Ecology 79:1029-1038.
63. Smith, F. A. and S. E. Smith. 1996. Mutualism and parasitism: Diversity in function and structure in the "arbuscular" (VA) mycorrhizal symbiosis. Adv. Bot. Res. 22:1-43.
64. Thompson, J. N. 1982. Interaction and coevolulion. Wiley and Sons, New York.
65. Thompson, J. N. 1988. Variation in interspecific interactions. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:65-87.
66. Thompson, J. N. and O. Pellmyr. 1992. Mutualism with pollinating seed parasites amid co-pollinators: Constraints on specialization. Ecology 73: 1780-1791.
67. Vander Wall, S. B. 1994. Seed fate pathways of antelope bitterbrush: Dispersal by seed-caching yellow pine chipmunks. Ecology 75:1911-1926.
68. .Wagner, D. 2000. Pollen viability reduction as a potential cost of ant association for Acacia constricta (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 87:711-715.
69. Weiblen, G. D., D. W. Yu, and S. A. West. 2001. Pollination and parasitism in functionally dioecious figs. Proc. Royal Soc. Londi Sen B 268:651-659.
70. West, S. A., E. A. Herre, D. M. Windsor, and P. R. S. Green. 1996. The ecology and evolution of the New World non-pollinating fig wasp communities. J. Biogeogr. 23:447-458.
71. Willmer, P. G. and G. N. Stone. 1997. How aggressive ant-guards assist seed-set in Acacia flowers. Nature 388:165-167.
72. Yu, D. W. and N. E. Pierce. 1998. A castration parasite of an ant-plant mutualism. Proc. Royal Soc. London Sen B 265:375-382.