Pressure support ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure ventilation with the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway: A randomized crossover study of anesthetized pediatric patients

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 100, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 357-360

  Von Goedecke, A ^a   Brimacombe, J ^b,c   Hormann C ^a   Jeske, H C ^a   Kleinsasser, A ^a   Keller, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c CAIRNS BASE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY PRESSURE; AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIA PHYSICAL STATUS; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BREATHING RATE; CARBON DIOXIDE TENSION; CHILD; CHRONOSEQUENCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DELTA ESOPHAGUS PRESSURE; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; ESOPHAGUS PRESSURE; EXPIRED AIR; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAS EXCHANGE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INSPIRATORY PRESSURE SUPPORT; INSPIRATORY TIME FRACTION; LARYNGEAL MASK; LUNG FUNCTION TEST; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; OXYGEN SATURATION; PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRESSURE SUPPORT VENTILATION; PRESSURE TIME PRODUCT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY DRIVE; TIDAL VOLUME; TIME;

ANESTHESIA, INHALATION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; INFANT; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION TESTS; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 12844266081     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143563.39519.FD     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Moylan SL, Luce MA. The reinforced laryngeal mask airway in paediatric radiotherapy. Br J Anaesth 1993;71:172.
2. St Claire Logan A, Morris P. Complications following use of the laryngeal mask airway in children. Paediatr Anaesth 1993;3: 297-300.
3. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Alvarez M. Safety and efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway: a prospective survey of 1400 children. Anaesthesia 1996;51:969-72.
4. Tokioka H, Kinjo M, Hirakawa M. The effectiveness of pressure support ventilation for mechanical ventilatory support in children. Anesthesiology 1993;78:880-4.
5. Jarreau PH, Moriette G, Mussat P, et al. Patient-triggered ventilation decreases the work of breathing in neonates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:1176-81.
6. Keidan I, Fine GF, Kagawa T, et al. Work of breathing during spontaneous ventilation in anesthetized children: a comparative study among the face mask, laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube. Anesth Analg 2000;91:1381-8.
7. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal': a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:650-4.
8. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000;93:104-9.
9. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal with the Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002;96: 289-95.
10. Verghese C. LMA-Classic™, LMAFlexible™, LMAUnique™: instruction manual. Henley-on-Thames: The Laryngeal Mask Company, 1999.
11. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Keller K, Morris R. A comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999;82: 286-7.
12. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kurian S, Myles J. Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:127-9.
13. Petros AJ, Lamond CT, Bennett D. The Bicore pulmonary monitor: a device to assess the work of breathing while weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anaesthesia 1993;48:985-8.
14. Banner MJ, Kirby RR, Blanch PB, Layon AJ. Decreasing imposed work of the breathing apparatus to zero using pressure-support ventilation. Crit Care Med 1993;21:1333-8.
15. Thomas AM, Turner RE, Tenholder MF. Esophageal pressure measurements in cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Chest 1997; 112:829-32.
16. Gaddis GM, Gaddis ML. Introduction to biostatistics. Part 5. Statistical inference techniques for hypothesis testing with non-parametric data. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:1054-9.
17. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Hörmann C. Pressure support ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure with the laryngeal mask airway: a randomized crossover study of anesthetized adult patients. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1621-3.
18. Westbrook PR, Stubbs SE, Sessler AD, et al. Effects of anesthesia and muscle paralysis on respiratory mechanics in normal man. J Appl Physiol 1973;34:81-6.
19. Collett PW, Perry C, Englel LA. Pressure-time product, flow, and oxygen cost of resistive breathing in humans. J Appl Physiol 1985;58:1263-72.
20. Sassoon CS, Light RW, Lodia R, et al. Pressure-time product during continuous positive airway pressure, pressure support ventilation and T-piece during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;143:469-75.
21. Lopez-Gil M, Brimacombe J, Keller C. A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth 2000;11:319-21.
22. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Loeckinger A. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Anesth Analg 2000;91:1017-20.