Long-term effects of CS: Clues to structural borrowing

International Journal of Bilingualism

Volumn 9, Issue 3-4, 2005, Pages 341-360

  Field, Fredric ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

borrowing; codeswitching; language contact

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248710573     PISSN: 13670069     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/13670069050090030301     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aitchison, J. (2001). Language change: Progress or decay? Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bakker, P. (1997). A Language of our own: The genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bakker, P. (2000). Rapid language change: Creolization, language intertwining, convergence. In C. Renfrew, A. McMahon & L. Trask (Eds.), Time depth in historical linguistics, Vol. 2 (pp. 585 -620). Cambridge, U.K.: The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research (Oxbow Books).
4. Campbell, L., & M. C., Muntzel (1989). The structural consequences of language death. In N. C. Dorian (Ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death (pp. 197-210). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
5. Clark, E.V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
6. Dorian, N.C. (1989). Introduction. In N. C. Dorian (Ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death (pp.1-10). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
7. Dorian, N.C. (1993). Internally and externally motivated change in language contact settings: Doubts about dichotomy. In C. Jones (Ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives (pp.131-155). London and New York: Longman.
8. Field, F. (1994). Caught in the middle: The case of Pocho and the Mixed Language Continuum. General Linguistics, 34 (2), 85-105. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, State University of New York.
9. Field, F. (2002). Linguistic borrowing in bilingual contexts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
10. Field, F. (forthcoming). Chicano-Latino bilingualism in the U.S. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
11. Gal, S. (1989). Lexical innovation and loss: The use and value of restricted Hungarian. In N. C. Dorian (Ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death (pp. 313-331). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
12. Grosjean, F. (1982). Life with two languages: An introduction to bilingualism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Grosjean, F. (1995). A psycholinguistic approach to codeswitching: The recognition of guest words by bilinguals. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on codeswitching (pp. 259-275). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14. Grosjean, F. (1997a). Processing mixed language: Issues, findings, and models. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp.225-254). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Grosjean, F. (1997b). The bilingual individual. Interpreting: International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, 2, 163-191.
16. Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language modes. In J. L. Nicol (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp.1-22). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
17. Gumperz, J. J. (Ed.). (1982). Language and social identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
18. Haugen, E. (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language, 26, 210-231.
19. Hawkins, J.A. (1983). Word order universals. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
20. Hill, J.H., & Hill, K. (1986). Speaking Mexicano: Dynamics of syncretic language in Central Mexico. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
21. Hoffmann, C. (1991). An introduction to bilingualism. New York, NY: Longman.
22. Jake, J.L. (1998). Constructing interlanguage: Building a composite matrix language. Linguistics, 36, 333-382.
23. Johanson, L. (1992). Strukturelle Faktoren in tuerkischen Sprachkontakten. Stuttgart, Germany: F. Steiner.
24. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
25. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 2, 141-176.
26. Matras, Y. (2000). How predictable is contact-induced change in grammar? In C. Renfrew, A. McMahon & L. Trask (Eds.), Time depth in historical linguistics, Vol. 2 (pp.563-583). Cambridge, U.K.: The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research (Oxbow Books).
27. Mithun, M. (1984). The evolution of noun incorporation. Language, 60, 847-894.
28. Mithun, M. (1989). The incipient obsolescence of polysynthesis: Cayuga in Ontario and Oklahoma. In N. C. Dorian (Ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death (pp.243-257). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
29. Mufwene, S. (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
30. Muysken, P. (2000). Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
31. Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Social motivations for codeswitching. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Myers-Scotton, C. (2002). Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Penfield, J., & Ornstein-Galicia, J.L. (1985). Chicano English: An ethnic contact dialect. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
34. Poulisse, N. (1997). Language production in bilinguals. In A. M. B. de Groot & J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp.201-224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Romaine, S. (1995). Bilingualism. 2nd edition. [Language in Society 13.] Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
36. Thomason, S.G. (2001). Language contact: An introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
37. Thomason, S.G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38. Weinreich, U. (1953) (reprinted in 1968). Languages in contact. The Hague: Mouton.