Effect of driver distraction and low alcohol concentrations on useful field of view and frequency-doubling technology perimetry

Acta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 86, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 634-641

  Puell, Maria Cinta ^a,b   Barrio, Ana ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b NONE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Distraction; Driving; Magnopathway; Perimetry; Useful field of view; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY PERIMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNOCELLULAR NUCLEUS; MALE; MENTAL CONCENTRATION; MENTAL TASK; MOBILE PHONE; NORMAL HUMAN; PACED AUDITORY SERIAL ADDITION TEST; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; SCORING SYSTEM; TASK PERFORMANCE; USEFUL FIELD OF VIEW; VISION TEST;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ATTENTION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; PERIMETRY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION DISORDERS; VISION TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 51049102791     PISSN: 1755375X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.01100.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adams CW, Bullimore MA, Wall M, Fingeret M & Johnson CA (1999): Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry. Optom Vis Sci 76: 582-587.
2. Anderson AJ & Johnson CA (2002): Mechanisms isolated by frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 398-401.
3. Anderson AJ & Johnson CA (2003): Frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 16: 213-225.
4. Anderson DR & Patella VM (1999): Automated standard perimetry. St Louis: Mosby.
5. Andre JT, Tyrrell RA, Leibowitz HW, Nicholson ME & Wang M (1994): Measuring and predicting the effects of alcohol consumption on contrast sensitivity for stationary and moving gratings. Percept Psychophys 56: 261-267.
6. Ball K, Owsley C, Sloane ME, Roenker DL & Bruni JR (1993): Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34: 3110-3123.
7. Ball K, Owsley C, Stalvey B, Roenker DL, Sloane ME & Graves M (1998): Driving avoidance and functional impairment in older drivers. Accid Anal Prev 30: 313-322.
8. Barkana Y, Zadok D, Morad Y & Avni I (2004): Visual field attention is reduced by concomitant hands-free conversation on a cellular telephone. Am J Ophthalmol 138: 347-353.
9. Broman AT, West SK, Munoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, Rubin GS & Turano KA (2004): Divided visual attention as a predictor of bumping while walking: The salisbury eye evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45: 2955-2960.
10. Buikhuisen W & Jongman RW (1972): Traffic perception under the influence of alcohol. Q J Stud Alcohol 33: 800-806.
11. Buser A, Lachenmayr B, Priemer F, Langnau A & Gilg T (1996): Effect of low alcohol concentrations on visual attention in street traffic. Ophthalmologe 93: 371-376.
12. Cheng A, Eysel U & Vidyasagar T (2004): The role of the magnocellular pathway in serial deployment of visual attention. Eur J Neurosci 20: 2188-2192.
13. Clay OJ, Wadley VG, Edwards JD, Roth DL, Roenker DL & Ball KK (2005): Cumulative meta-analysis of the relationship between useful field of view and driving performance in older adults: Current and future implications. Optom Vis Sci 82: 724-731.
14. Edwards JD, Vance DE, Wadley VG, Cissell GM, Roenker DL & Ball KK (2005): Reliability and validity of useful field of view test scores as administered by personal computer. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 27: 529-543.
15. Ferreras A, Larrosa JM, Polo V, Pajarin AB, Mayoral F & Honrubia FM (2007): Frequency-doublinS technology: searching for the optimum diagnostic criteria for glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85: 73-79.
16. Gronwall DM (1977): Paced auditAry serial-addition task: a measure of recovery from concussion. Percept Mot Skills 44: 367-373.
17. Hancock PA, Lesch M & Simmons L (2003): The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. Accid Anal Prev 35: 501-514.
18. Harbluk JL, Noy YI & Eizenman M (2002): The impact of cognitive distraction on driver behaviour and vehicle control. Ottawa: Ministry of Transport, Canada.
19. Iudice A, Bonanni E, Gelli A, Frittelli C, Iudice G, Cignoni F, Ghicopulos I & Murri L (2005): Effects of prolonged wakefulness combined with alcohol and hands-free cell phone divided attention tasks on simulated driving. Hum Psychopharmacol 20: 125-132.
20. Johnson CA & Samuels SJ (1997): Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38: 413-425.
21. Johnson CA, Cioffi GA & Van Buskirk EM (1999): Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern. Optom Vis Sci 76: 571-581.
22. Jones AW & Neri A (1994): Age-related differences in the effects of ethanol on performance and behaviour in healthy men. Alcohol and Alcoholism 29: 171-179.
23. Kelly DH (1981): Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings. J Opt Soc Am 71: 1051-1055.
24. Lesch MF & Hancock PA (2004): Driving performance during concurrent cell-phone use: Are drivers aware of their performance decrements? Accid Anal Prev 36: 471-480.
25. Lezak MD (1995): Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Lyvers MF & Maltzman I (1991): Selective effects of alcohol on Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance. Br J Addict 86: 399-407.
27. Maddess T & Henry G (1992): Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci 7: 371-383.
28. Martin L (2005): Rarebit and frequency-doubling technology perimetry in children and young adults. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83: 670-677.
29. Moskowitz H, Ziedman K & Sharma S (1976): Visual search behavior while viewing driving scenes under the influence of alcohol and marihuana. Hum Factors 18: 417-431.
30. Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K & Johnson CA (2000): Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 2212-2221.
31. Nicholson ME, Andre JT, Tyrrell RA, Wang M & Leibowitz HW (1995): Effects of moderate dose alcohol on visual contrast sensitivity for stationary and moving targets. J Stud Alcohol 56: 261-266.
32. Owsley C (1994): Vision and driving in the elderly. Optom Vis Sci 71: 727-735.
33. Owsley C, Ball KK & Keeton DM (1995): Relationship between visual sensitivity and target localization in older adults. Vision Res 35: 579-587.
34. Owsley C, Ball K, McGwin G Jr, Sloane ME, Roenker DL, White MF & Overley ET (1998a): Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. JAMA 279: 1083-1088.
35. Owsley C, McGwin G Jr & Ball K (1998b): Vision impairment, eye disease, and injurious motor vehicle crashes in the elderly. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 5: 101-113.
36. Patten CJD, Kircher A, Ostlund J & Nilsson L (2004): Using mobile telephones: Cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. Accid Anal Prev 36: 341-350.
37. Pearson P & Timney B (1998): Effects of moderate blood alcohol concentrations on spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity. J Stud Alcohol 59: 163-173.
38. Pierre-Filho PT, Schimiti RB, Vasconcellos JP & Costa VP (2006): Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 84: 345-350.
39. Quintyn JC, Massy J, Quillard M & Brasseur G (1999): Effects of low alcohol consumption on visual evoked potential, visual field and visual contrast sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77: 23-26.
40. Recarte MA & Nunes LME(2003): Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. J Exp Psychol Appl 9: 119-137.
41. Rio MC, Gonzalez-Luque JC & Alvarez FJ (2001): Alcohol-related problems and fitness to drive. Alcohol and Alcoholism 36: 256-261.
42. Rizzo M, Stierman L, Skaar N, Dawson JD, Anderson SW & Vecera SP (2004): Effects of a controlled auditory-verbal distraction task on older driver vehicle control. National Academy of Sciences. J Transportation Res Board 1865: 1-6.
43. Rizzo M, Anderson SW, Sparks JD, Rodnitzky RL & Dawson JD (2006): Driving with distraction in Parkinson disease. Neurology 67: 1774-1780.
44. Roge J, Pebayle T, Lambilliotte E, Spitzenstetter F, Giselbrecht D & Muzet A (2004): Influence of age, speed and duration of monotonous driving task in traffic on the driver's useful visual field. Vision Res 44: 2737-2744.
45. Roge J, Pebayle T, Campagne A & Muzet A (2005): Useful visual field reduction as a function of age and risk of accident in simulated car driving. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46: 1774-1779.
46. Roquelaure Y, Le Gargasson JF, Kupper S, Girre C, Hispard E & Dally S (1995): Alcohol consumption and visual contrast sensitivity. Alcohol and Alcoholism 30: 681-685.
47. Sekuler R & Blake R (1994): Perception. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
48. Skaar N, Rizzo M, Bateman K & Anderson SW (2001): Effects of speed of visual processing training upon non-visual attention in 'at-risk' older drivers. International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. Snowmass Village at Aspen, Colorado.
49. Summala H & Mikkola T (1994): Fatal accidents among car and truck drivers: Effects of fatigue, age, and alcohol consumption. Hum Factors 36: 315-326.
50. Tyrrell R & Owens D (1988): A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eyes and other threshold phenomena: The modified binary search (MOBS). Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 20: 137-141.
51. Verghese P (2001): VisuAl search and attention: a signal detection theory approach. Neuron 31: 523-535.
52. Wall M, Woodward KR & Brito CF (2004): The effect of attention on conventional automated perimetry and luminance size threshold perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45: 342-350.
53. Watten RG & Lie I (1996): Visual functions and acute ingestion of alcohol. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 16: 460-466.
54. White AJR, Sun H, Swanson WH & Lee BB (2002): An examination of physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43: 3590-3599.
55. Wiens A, Fuller K & Crossen J (1997): Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test: Adults norms and moderator variables. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 19: 473-483.
56. Wood JM, Collins MJ & Carkeet A (1992): Regional variations in binocular sensitivity across the visual field. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 12: 46-51.