Visual field attention is reduced by concomitant hands-free conversation on a cellular telephone

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 138, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 347-353

  Barkana, Yaniv ^a   Zadok, David ^a   Morad, Yair ^a   Avni, Isaac ^a  

^a ASSAF HAROFEH MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSATION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; NORMAL HUMAN; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; ATTENTION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CELLULAR PHONE; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; PERIMETRY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 4444346408     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Redelmeier D.A., Tibshirani R.J. Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. N Engl J Med. 336:1997;7453-7458
2. Violanti J.M., Marshall J.R. Cellular phones and traffic accidents an epidemiological approach. Accid Anal Prev. 28:1996;265-270
3. Violanti J.M. Cellular phones and fatal traffic collisions. Accid Anal Prev. 30:1998;519-524
4. Briem V., Hedman L.R. Behavioural effects of mobile telephone use during simulated driving. Ergonomics. 38:1995;2536-2562
5. Brookhuis K.A., de Vries G., de Waard D. The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. Accid Anal Prev. 23:1991;309-316
6. Reed M.P., Green P.A. Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialing task. Ergonomics. 42:1999;1015-1037
7. Strayer D.L., Johnston W.A. Driven to distraction dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychol Sci. 12:2001;462-466
8. Consiglio W., Driscoll P., Witte M., Berg W.P. Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. Accid Anal Prev. 35:2003;495-500
9. Lamble D., Kauranen T., Laakso M., Summala H. Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. Accid Anal Prev. 31:1999;617-623
10. Ball K., Owsley C., Sloane M.E., Roenker D.L., Bruni J. Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 34:1993;3110-3123
11. Owsley C., Ball K., McGwin G., et al. Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. JAMA. 279:1998;1083-1088
12. Strayer D.L., Drews F.A., Johnston W.A. Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. J Exp Psychol Appl. 9:2003;23-32
13. Searle A.E., Wild J.M., Shaw D.E., O'Neill E.C. Time-related variation in normal automated static perimetry. Ophthalmology. 98:1991;701-707
14. Johnson C.A., Adams A.J., Lewis R.A. Fatigue effects in automated perimetry. Applied Optics. 27:1988;1030-1037
15. Johnson C.A., Cioffi G.A., Drance S.M., et al. A multicenter comparison study of the Humphrey Field Analyzer I and the Humphrey Field Analyzer II. Ophthalmology. 104:1997;1910-1917
16. Budenz D.L., Rhee P., Feuer W.J., McSoley J., Johnson C.A., Anderson D.R. Comparison of glaucomatous visual field defects using standard full threshold and Swedish interactive threshold algorithms. Arch Ophthalmol. 120:2002;1136-1141
17. Budenz D.L., Rhee P., Feuer W.J., McSoley J., Johnson C.A., Anderson D.R. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects. Ophthalmology. 109:2002;1052-1058
18. Alm H., Nilsson L. The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. Accid Anal Prev. 27:1995;707-715