Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 76, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 582-587

  Adams, Craig W ^a,e   Bullimore, Mark A ^b   Wall, Michael ^c   Fingeret, Murray ^d   Johnson, Chris A ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^d Veterans Administration   (United States)

^e DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Contrast sensitivity; Frequency doubling; Perimetry; Visual fields

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS; VISION;

FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY (FDT) PERIMETRY;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGING; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REFERENCE VALUES; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0032803451     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199908000-00027     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am 1966:56:1628-33.
2. Kelly DH. Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings. J Opt Soc Am 1981:71:1051-5.
3. Richards W, Feiton TB. Spatial frequency doubling: retinal or central? Vision Res 1973;13:2129-37.
4. Tyler CW. Observations on spatial-frequency doubling. Perception 1974:3:81-6.
5. Virsu V, Nyman G, Lehtio PK. Diphasic and polyphasic temporal modulations multiply apparent spatial frequency. Perception 1974; 3:323-36.
6. Tolhurst DJ. Illusory shifts in spatial frequency caused by temporal modulation. Perception 1975:4:331-5.
7. Virsu V, Laurinen P. Long-lasting afterimages caused by neural adaptation. Vision Res 1977:17:853-60.
8. Maddess T, Henry GH. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci 1992:7:371-83.
9. Maddess T, Goldberg I, Dobinson J, Wine S, James AC. Clinical trials of the frequency doubled illusion as a indicator of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995:36:8335.
10. Quigley HA, Sanchez RM, Dunkelberger GR, L'Hernault NL, Baginski TA. Chronic glaucoma selectively damages large optic nerve fibers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987:28:913-20.
11. Glovinsky Y, Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR. Retinal ganglion cell loss is size dependent in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991:32:484-91.
12. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997:38:413-25-
13. Johnson CA, Demirel S. The role of spatial and temporal factors in frequency doubling perimetry. In: Wall M, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update, 1996/1997. Amsterdam: Kugler Publishers, 1997:13-9.
14. Chauhan BC, LeBlanc RP, McCormick TA, Rogers JB. Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;118:9-15.
15. Sponsel WE, Arango S, Trigo Y, Mensah J. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;125:830-6.
16. Kondo Y, Yamamoto T, Sato Y, Matsubara M, Kitizawa Y. A frequency-doubling perimetric study in normal-tension glaucoma with hemifield defect. J Glaucoma 1998:7:261-5.
17. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol 1998:125:819-29.
18. Jaffe GJ, Alvarado JA, Juster RP. Age-related changes of the normal visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 1986:104:1021-5.
19. Johnson MA, Choy D. On the definition of age-related norms for visual function testing. Appl Opt 1987:26:1449-54.
20. Brenton RS, Phelps CD. The normal visual field on the Humphrey field analyzer. Ophthalmologica 1986; 193:56-74.
21. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 1987:105:1544-9.
22. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Lewis RA. Evidence for a neural basis of age-related visual field loss in normal observers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989:30:2056-64.
23. Tyrrell RA, Owens DA. A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eyes and other threshold phenomena: the modified binary search (MOBS). Behav Res Meth Inst Comp 1988:20:137-41.