Medical appraisal: Collecting evidence of performance through 360° feedback

Clinician in Management

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 165-171

  Bennett, Harvey ^a   Gatrell, John ^b   Packham, Roger ^c  

^a 360 is us Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^b Kings House 17   (United Kingdom)

^c POOLE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

360; Appraisal; Assessment; Consultant; Feedback; Medical; Multi rater; Performance; Personal development

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; DOCUMENTATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; JOB PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL STAFF; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEAMWORK; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 18744403675     PISSN: 09655751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Borrill C and West M (2001) Organisation, Management and Effectiveness in NHS Trusts. Aston Centre for Health Services Organisation Research: Birmingham.
2. British Psychological Society (2001) 360° Feedback: Guidelines for Best Practice. British Psychological Society: Leicester. www.psychtesting.org.uk (accessed 11/09/04).
3. General Medical Council (2001) Good Medical Practice. GMC: London.
4. Hall W, Violato C, Lewkonia R et al. (1999) Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the Physician Achievement Review. CMAJ 161 (1): 52-7.
5. Ramsey PG, Carline JD, Blank LL and Wenrich MD (1996) Feasibility of hospital-based use of peer ratings to evaluate the performance of practicing physicians. Academic Medicine 71: 364-70.
6. Waters E (2004) Assessing consultant performance: could do better? Clinician in Management 12 (2): 83-7.