Cognitive neuropsychological approaches to word production in aphasia: Beyond boxes and arrows

Aphasiology

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1019-1053

  Wilshire, Carolyn E ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APHASIA; COGNITION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FLUENCY DISORDER; GRAMMAR; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LANGUAGE TEST; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SPEECH ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEMATIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 50549093001     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: 14645041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687030701536016     Document Type: Review

References (129)

1. Bachoud-Levi, A-C. and Dupoux, E. (2003) An influence of syntactic and semantic variables on phonological retrieval. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20:2, pp. 163-188.
2. Badecker, W., Miozzo, M. and Zanuttini, R. (1995) The two-stage model of lexical retrieval: Evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition, 34, pp. 205-243.
3. Belke, E., Meyer, A. S. and Damian, M. F. (2005) Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 58, pp. 667-692.
4. Benson, D. F. (1979) Neurologic correlates of anomia. Studies in neurolinguistics, vol. 4, Academic Press, New York
5. Berg, T. (2005) A structural account of phonological paraphasias. Brain and Language, 94, pp. 104-129.
6. Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., Burton, M. W. and Mitchum, C. C. (2002) Grammatical class and imageability in aphasic word production: Their effects are independent. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, pp. 353-371.
7. Best, W. (1996) When racquets are baskets but baskets are biscuits, where do the words come from? A single case study of formal paraphasic errors in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, pp. 443-480.
8. Biran, M. and Friedmann, N. (2005) From phonological paraphasias to the structure of the phonological output lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20:4, pp. 589-616.
9. Bird, H., Howard, D. and Franklin, S. (2000) Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits. Brain and Language, 72:3, pp. 246-309.
10. Bisiacchi, P. S., Cipolotti, L. and Denes, G. (1989) Impairment in processing meaningless verbal material in several modalities: The relationship between short term memory and phonological skills. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, pp. 293-319.
11. Black, M. and Chiat, S. (2003) Noun-verb dissociations: A multi-faceted phenomenon. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, pp. 231-250.
12. Blanken, G. (1990) Formal paraphasias: A single case study. Brain and Language, 38, pp. 534-554.
13. Blanken, G. (1993) The production of stereotyped neologisms in aphasia: A case study. Aphasiology, 7:6, pp. 551-568.
14. Blanken, G. (1998) Lexicalisation in speech production: Evidence from form-related word substitutions in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15:4, pp. 321-360.
15. Breedin, S. D. and Martin, R. C. (1996) Patterns of verb impairment in aphasia: An analysis of four cases. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, pp. 51-91.
16. Bub, D., Black, S., Howell, J. and Kertesz, A. (1987) Damage to input and output buffers - What's a lexicality effect doing in a place like that?. Motor and sensory processes of language, pp. 79-110. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, NJ
17. Bub, D. and Kertesz, A. (1982) Evidence of lexicographic processing in a patient with preserved written over oral single word naming. Brain, 105, pp. 697-717.
18. Byng, S., Nickels, L. and Black, M. (1994) Replicating therapy for mapping deficits in agrammatism: Remapping the deficit?. Aphasiology, 8, pp. 315-341.
19. Caplan, D., Vanier, M. and Baker, C. (1986) A case study of reproduction conduction aphasia. I: Word production. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, pp. 99-128.
20. Caramazza, A. (1997) How many levels of processing are there in lexical access?. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, pp. 177-208.
21. Caramazza, A. and Hillis, A. E. (1990) Where do semantic errors come from?. Cortex, 26, pp. 95-122.
22. Caramazza, A., Miceli, G. and Villa, G. (1986) The role of the (output) phonological buffer in reading, writing and repetition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, pp. 37-76.
23. Chialant, D., Costa, A. and Caramazza, A. (2002) Disorders of naming. Handbook of adult language disorders I-Integrating cognitive neuropsychology, neurology, and rehabilitation, pp. 123-142. Psychology Press, Hove, UK
24. Cuetos, F. (2003) Anomia. La dificultad para recordar las palabras, TEA, Madrid
25. Cuetos, F., Aguado, G. and Caramazza, A. (2000) Dissociation of semantic and phonological errors in naming. Brain and Language, 75, pp. 451-460.
26. Cutting, J. C. and Ferreira, V. S. (1999) Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25:2, pp. 318-344.
27. Dell, G. S. (1986) A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, pp. 283-321.
28. Dell, G. S. (1988) The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Test of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, pp. 124-142.
29. Dell, G. S., Lawler, E. N., Harris, H. D. and Gordon, J. K. (2004) Models of errors of omission in aphasic naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, pp. 125-145.
30. Dell, G. S. and O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1991) Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al. (1991). Psychological Review, 98, pp. 604-614.
31. Dell, G. S. and O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1992) Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42, pp. 287-314.
32. Dell, G. S. and Reich, P. A. (1981) Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, pp. 611-629.
33. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M. and Gagnon, D. A. (1997) Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, pp. 801-838.
34. Doyle, P. J., Goldstein, H. and Bourgeois, M. S. (1987) Experimental analysis of syntax training in Broca's aphasia: A generalization and social validation study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52:2, pp. 143-155.
35. Ellis, A. W. (1982) Spelling and writing (and reading and speaking). Normality and pathology in cognitive functions, Academic Press, London
36. Ellis, A. W. and Young, A. W. (1988) Human cognitive neuropsychology, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, Hove, UK
37. Foygel, D. and Dell, G. S. (2000) Models of impaired lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, pp. 182-216.
38. Franklin, S., Buerk, F. and Howard, D. (2002) Generalised improvement in speech production for a subject with reproduction conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 16:1011, pp. 1087-1114.
39. Freedman, M. L., Martin, R. C. and Biegler, K. (2004) Semantic relatedness effects in conjoined noun phrase production: Implications for the role of short-term memory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, pp. 245-265.
40. Gagnon, D. A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Dell, G. S. and Saffran, E. M. (1997) The origins of formal paraphasias in aphasics' picture naming. Brain and Language, 59, pp. 450-472.
41. Garrett, M. F. (1975) The analysis of sentence production. Psychology of learning and motivation Vol 9, pp. 133-177. Academic Press, New York
42. Goldrick, M. and Rapp, B. (2007) Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102, pp. 219-260.
43. Goodglass, H. and Kaplan, E. (1983) The assessment of aphasia and related disorders, 2nd edition, Lea & Feibiger, Philadelphia
44. Goodglass, H., Christiansen, J. A. and Gallagher, R. (1994) Syntactic constructions used by agrammatic speakers: Comparison with conduction aphasics and normals. Neuropsychology, 8:4, pp. 598-613.
45. (1997) Anomia: Neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
46. Gordon, J. K. (2002) Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structured contexts. Brain and Language, 82, pp. 113-145.
47. Gordon, J. K. and Dell, G. S. (2003) Learning to divide the labor: An account of deficits in light and heavy verb production. Cognitive Science, 27, pp. 1-40.
48. Hanley, J. R., Dell, G. S., Kay, J. and Baron, R. (2004) Evidence for the involvement of a nonlexical route in the repetition of familiar words: A comparison of single and dual route models of auditory repetition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21:2, pp. 147-158.
49. Hanley, J. R. and Kay, J. (1997) An effect of imageability on the production of phonological errors in auditory repetition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14:8, pp. 1065-1084.
50. Hanley, J. R., Kay, J. and Edwards, M. (2002) Imageability effects, phonological errors, and the relationship between auditory repetition and picture naming: Implications for models of auditory repetition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19:3, pp. 193-206.
51. Harley, T. A. (1984) A critique of top-down independent levels models of speech production. Evidence from non-phrase-internal errors. Cognitive Science, 8, pp. 191-219.
52. Harley, T. A. and MacAndrew, S. B. G. (1992) Modelling paraphasias in normal and aphasic speech. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Bloomington, IN, pp. 387-383. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, NJ
53. Harris, M. and Coltheart, M. (1986) Language processing in children and adults, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
54. Helm-Estabrooks, N., Fitzpatrick, P. M. and Barresi, B. (1981) Response of an agrammatic patient to a syntax stimulation program for aphasia. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 46:4, pp. 422-427.
55. Henaff Gonon, M., Bruckert, R. and Michel, F. (1989) Lexicalization in an anomic patient. Neuropsychologia, 27, pp. 391-407.
56. Hillis, A. E. and Caramazza, A. (1994) Theories of lexical processing and rehabilitation of lexical deficits. Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation, pp. 1-30. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, Hove, UK
57. Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B. C., Romani, C. and Caramazza, A. (1990) Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, pp. 191-243.
58. Howard, D. and Franklin, S. (1988) Missing the meaning? A cognitive neuropsychological study of the processing of words by an aphasic patient, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
59. Howard, D. and Gatehouse, C. (2006) Distinguishing semantic and lexical word retrieval deficits in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 20:91011, pp. 921-950.
60. Howard, D. and Orchard-Lisle, V. (1984) On the origin of semantic errors in naming: Evidence from the case of a global aphasic. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, pp. 163-190.
61. Howard, D. and Patterson, K. (1992) Pyramids and Palm Trees: A test of semantic access from pictures and words, Thames Valley Test Company, Bury St. Edmunds, UK
62. Jefferies, E., Crisp, J. and Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006) The impact of phonological or semantic impairment on delayed auditory repetition: Evidence from stroke aphasia and semantic dementia. Aphasiology, 20:9, pp. 963-992.
63. Kay, J. and Ellis, A. (1987) A cognitive neuropsychological case study of anomia. Brain, 110, pp. 613-629.
64. Kay, J., Lesser, R. and Coltheart, M. (1992) Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, Hove, UK
65. Keall, L. (2003) An investigation of a two-dimensional model of fluent aphasia
66. Kempen, G. and Huijbers, P. (1983) The lexicalization process in sentence production and naming. Indirect selection of words. Cognition, 14, pp. 184-209.
67. Kohn, S. E. and Goodglass, H. (1985) Picture naming in aphasia. Brain and Language, 24, pp. 266-283.
68. Kolk, H. (1995) A time-based approach to agrammatic production. Brain and Language, 50:3, pp. 282-303.
69. Kolk, H. H. J. (1987) A theory of grammatical impairment in aphasia. Natural language generation: New results in artificial intelligence, psychology and linguistics, pp. 379-391. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht
70. Kulke, F. and Blanken, G. (2001) Phonological and syntactic influences on semantic misnamings in aphasia. Aphasiology, 15:1, pp. 3-15.
71. Laine, M. and Martin, N. (1996) Lexical retrieval deficit in picture naming: Implications for word production models. Brain and Language, 53, pp. 283-331.
72. Laine, M. and Martin, N. (2006) Anomia: Theoretical and clinical aspects, Psychology Press, Hove, UK
73. Laine, M., Tikkala, A. and Juhola, M. (1998) Modelling anomia by the discrete two-stage word production architecture. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, pp. 275-294.
74. Lambon-Ralph, M. A., Sage, K. and Roberts, J. (2000) Classical anomia: A neuropsychological perspective on speech production. Neuropsychologia, 38, pp. 186-202.
75. Lambon Ralph, M. A. L., Moriarty, L., Sage, K. and York Speech Therapy Interest Group (2002) Anomia is simply a reflection of semantic and phonological impairments: Evidence from a case-series study. Aphasiology, 16:1, pp. 56-82.
76. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
77. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A. S. (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, pp. 1-75.
78. MacKay, D. G. (1987) The organization of perception and action, Springer Verlag, New York
79. Marshall, J., Pring, T. and Chiat, S. (1998) Verb retrieval and sentence production in aphasia. Brain and Language, 63, pp. 159-183.
80. Martin, N., Dell, G. S., Saffran, E. M. and Schwartz, M. F. (1994) Origins of paraphasias in deep dysphasia: Testing the consequences of a decay impairment to an interactive spreading activation model of lexical retrieval. Brain and Language, 47, pp. 609-660.
81. Martin, N., Dell, G. S. and Schwartz, M. F. (2004) Testing the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Part II. Predicting repetition from naming. Brain and Language, 91:1, pp. 73-74.
82. Martin, N., Gagnon, D. A., Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S. and Saffran, E. M. (1996) Phonological facilitation of semantic errors in normal and aphasic speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, pp. 257-282.
83. Martin, N. and Saffran, E. M. (1992) A computational account of deep dysphasia: Evidence from a single case study. Brain and Language, 43, pp. 240-274.
84. Martin, N. and Saffran, E. M. (2002) The relationship of input and output phonological processing: An evaluation of models and evidence to support them. Aphasiology, 16, pp. 107-150.
85. Martin, N., Saffran, E. M. and Dell, G. S. (1996) Recovery in deep dysphasia: Evidence for a relation between auditory-verbal STM capacity and lexical errors in repetition. Brain and Language, 52, pp. 83-113.
86. Martin, R. C. and Hamilton, A. C. (2005) Dissociations among tasks involving inhibition: A single-case study. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5:1, pp. 1-13.
87. McCarthy, R. A. and Warrington, E. K. (1984) A two route model of speech production: Evidence from aphasia. Brain, 107, pp. 463-485.
88. McCloskey, M., Sokol, S. and Goodman, R. A. (1986) Cognitive processes in verbal-number production: Inferences from the performance of brain-damaged subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, pp. 307-330.
89. Miceli, G., Mazzucchi, A., Menn, L. and Goodglass, H. (1983) Contrasting cases of Italian agrammatic aphasia without comprehension disorder. Brain and Language, 19, pp. 65-97.
90. Morton, J. (1980) The logogen model and orthographic structure. Cognitive processes in spelling, pp. 117-133. Academic Press, London
91. Morton, J. and Patterson, K. (1980) A new attempt at an interpretation, or, an attempt at a new interpretation. Deep dyslexia, pp. 91-118. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
92. Navarrete, E. and Costa, A. (2005) Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 53:3, pp. 359-377.
93. Nickels, L. A. (1997) Spoken word production and its breakdown in aphasia, Psychology Press, Hove, UK
94. Nickels, L. A. (2001) Words fail me: Symptoms and causes of naming breakdown in aphasia. Handbook of neuropsychology, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
95. Nickels, L. A. and Best, W. M. (1996) Therapy for naming disorders (Part I): Principles, puzzles and progress. Aphasiology, 10, pp. 21-47.
96. Nickels, L. A. and Howard, D. (1995) Phonological errors in aphasic naming: Comprehension, monitoring and lexicality. Cortex, 31, pp. 209-237.
97. Nooteboom, S. G. (2005) Listening to oneself: Monitoring speech production. Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech, pp. 167-186. Psychology Press, Hove, UK
98. Papagno, C. and Girelli, L. (2005) Writing through the phonological buffer: A case of progressive writing disorder. Neuropsychologia, 43:9, pp. 1277-1287.
99. Patterson, K. E. and Shewell, C. (1987) Speak and Spell: Dissociations and word-class effects. The cognitive neuropsychology of language, pp. 273-294. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, London
100. Peterson, R. R. and Savoy, P. (1998) Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24:3, pp. 539-557.
101. Rapp, B. and Goldrick, M. (2000) Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, pp. 460-499.
102. Rapp, B. and Goldrick, M. (2004) Feedback by any other name is still interactivity: A reply to Roelofs' comment on Rapp & Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review, 111:2, pp. 573-578.
103. Roelofs, A. (1992) A spreading activation model of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, pp. 107-142.
104. Roelofs, A. (1997) The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64, pp. 249-284.
105. Roelofs, A. (2004) Comprehension-based versus production-internal feedback in planning spoken words: A rejoinder to Rapp and Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review, 111, pp. 579-580.
106. Rossion, B. and Pourtois, G. (2004) Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic level object recognition. Perception, 33:2, pp. 217-236.
107. Ruml, W., Caramazza, A., Capasso, R. and Miceli, G. (2005) Interactivity and continuity in normal and aphasic language production. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, pp. 131-168.
108. Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F., Linebarger, M. C., Martin, N. and Bochetto, P. (1988) Philadelphia Comprehension Battery
109. Saito, A., Yoshimura, T., Itakura, T. and Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2003) Demonstrating a wordlikeness effect on nonsense word repetition performance in a conduction aphasic patient. Brain and language, 85:2, pp. 222-230.
110. Schnur, T. T., Schwartz, M. F., Brecher, A. and Hodgson, C. (2006) Semantic interference during blocked-cyclic naming: Evidence from aphasia. Journal of Memory and Language, 54:2, pp. 199-227.
111. Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., Martin, N., Gahl, S. and Sobel, P. (2006) A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, pp. 228-264.
112. Schwartz, M. F. and Hodgson, C. (2002) Context-sensitive word retrieval deficit: A cognitive neuropsychological case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, pp. 263-288.
113. Schwartz, M. F., Linebarger, M. C. and Saffran, E. M. (1985) The status of the syntactic deficit theory of agrammatism. Agrammatism, pp. 83-104. Academic Press, New York
114. Semenza, C. and Zettin, M. (1988) Generating proper names: A case of selective inability. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, pp. 711-721.
115. Shallice, T. (1988) From neuropsychology to mental structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
116. Shallice, T., Rumiati, R. I. and Zadini, A. (2000) The selective impairment of the phonological output buffer. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17:6, pp. 517-546.
117. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1983) Sublexical units and suprasegmental structure in speech production planning. The production of speech, pp. 109-136. Springer, New York
118. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1987) The role of word-onset consonants in speech production planning: New evidence from speech error patterns. Motor and sensory processes of language, pp. 17-51. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, NJ
119. Square-Storer, P. A., Roy, E. A. and Hogg, S. C. (1990) The dissociation of aphasia from apraxia of speech, ideomotor limb and buccofacial apraxia. Advances in psychology: Cerebral control of speech and limb movements, pp. 451-476. North-Holland, Amsterdam
120. Stemberger, J. P. (1985) An interactive activation model of language production. Progress in the psychology of language, pp. 143-186. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, Hove, UK
121. Stemberger, J. P. (1990) Wordshape errors in language production. Cognition, 35, pp. 123-157.
122. Swinburn, K., Porter, G. and Howard, D. (2004) The Comprehensive Aphasia Test, Psychology Press, Hove, UK
123. Ullman, M. T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J. H. Koroshetz, W. J. et al. (1997) A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, pp. 266-276.
124. Wilshire, C. E. (2002) Where do aphasic phonological errors come from? Evidence from phoneme movement errors in picture naming. Aphasiology, 16:1, pp. 169-197.
125. Wilshire, C. E. and Fisher, C. A. (2004) "Phonological dysphasia": A cross-modal phonological impairment affecting repetition, production and comprehension. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21:2, pp. 187-210.
126. Wilshire, C. E., Keall, L. M., Stuart, E. J. and O'Donnell, D. J. (2007) Exploring the dynamics of aphasic word production using the picture-word interference task: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 45:5, pp. 939-953.
127. Wilshire, C. E. and McCarthy, R. A. (2002) Evidence for a context-sensitive word retrieval disorder in a case of nonfluent aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, pp. 165-186.
128. Wilshire, C. E. and Saffran, E. M. (2005) Contrasting effects of phonological priming in aphasic word production. Cognition, 95:1, pp. 31-71.
129. Wilshire, C. E., Scott, R. and Stuart, E. J. (2006) Effects of competitor words on production in a case of nonfluent aphasia,. Brain and Language, 99:1, pp. 81-82.