Patterns of verb impairment in aphasia: An analysis of four cases

Cognitive Neuropsychology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 51-92

  Breedin, Sarah D ^a   Martin, Randi C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002597263     PISSN: 02643294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/026432996382060     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Berndt, R.S., Mitchum, C.C., Haendiges, A.N., & Sandson, J. (1995). Verb retrieval in aphasia: 1. Characterising single word impairments. Brain and Language.
2. Blaxton, T.A. & Bookheimer, S.Y. (1993). Retrieval inhibition in anomia. Brain and Language. 44, 221-237.
3. Byng, S. (1986). Sentence processing deficits in aphasia: Investigation and remediation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London.
4. Byng, S. (1988). Sentence processing deficits: Theory and therapy. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 629-676.
5. Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1991). Selective impairment of thematic role assignment in sentence processing. Brain and Language, 41, 402-436.
6. Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. (1976). Dissociations of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572-582.
7. Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1981). Manual for forms L and M of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
8. Fillmore, C.J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
9. Fisher, C., Gleitman, H., & Gleitman, L.R. (1991). On the semantic content of subcategorisation frames. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 331-392.
10. Francis, W.N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
11. Gentner, D. (1975). Evidence for the psychological reality of semantic components: The verbs of possession. In D.A. Norman & D.E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Explorations in cognition. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman & Co.
12. Gentner, D. (1981). Verb semantic structure in memory for sentences: Evidence for componential representation. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 56-83.
13. Gernsbacher, M.A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256-281.
14. Goodgiass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1972). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Ferbiger.
15. Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,
16. Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Jones, E.V. (1984). Word order processing in aphasia: Effect of verb semantics. In F.C. Rose (Ed.), Advances in neurology, 42: Progress in aphasiology (pp. 159-181). New York: Raven.
19. Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Linebarger, M.C., Schwartz, M.F., & Saffran, E.M. (1983). Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasies. Cognition, 13, 361-392.
21. Martin, R.C., & Blossom-Stach, C. (1986). Evidence of syntactic deficits in a fluent aphasic. Brain and Language, 28, 196-234.
22. Martin, R.C., Wetzel, W.F., Blossom-Stach, C., & Feher, E. (1989). Syntactic loss versus processing deficit: An assessment of two theories of agrammatism and syntactic comprehension deficits. Cognition, 32, 157-191.
23. Miceli, G., Silveri, C., Villa, G., & Caramazza, A. (1984). The basis for the agrammatic's difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex, 20, 207-220.
24. Miller, G.A., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Myerson, R., &. Goodgiass, H. (1972). Transformational grammars of three agrammatic patients. Language and Speech, 15, 40-50.
26. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Radford, A. (1988). Transformational grammar: A first course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Rapp, B.A., & Caramazza, A. (1993). On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage: A question of theory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 113-141.
29. Saffran, E.M., Schwartz, M.F., & Marin, O.S.M. (1980a). Evidence from aphasia: Isolating the components of a production model. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 221-241). London: Academic Press.
30. Saffran, E.M., Schwartz, M.F., & Marin, O.S.M. (1980b). The word order problem in agrammatism II. Production Brain and Language, 10, 263-280.
31. Saffran, E.M., Schwartz, M.F., Fink, R., Myers, J., & Martin, N. (1992). Mapping therapy: An approach to remediating agrammatic sentence comprehension and production. In J.A. Cooper (Ed.), Aphasia treatment: Current approaches and research opportunities (NIDCD Monograph, Vol. 2; NIH No. 92-3424). Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Health.
32. Schwartz, M.F., Linebarger, M.L., & Saffran, E.M. (1985). The status of the syntactic theory of agrammatism. In M.L. Kean (Ed.), Agrammatism. New York: Academic Press.
33. Shernoff, E.H., Blossom-Stach, C., & Martin, R.C. (1994). Consequences of thematic role therapy for speed of processing. Academy of Aphasia Conference: Brain and Language, 47, 512-514.
34. Siegel, S., & Castellan, N.J. Jr. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences (2nd edn). New York: McGraw Hill, Inc.
35. Williams, E. (1981). Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review, 1, 81-114.
36. Williams, S.E., & Canter, G.J. (1987). Action-naming performance in four syndromes of aphasia. Brain and Language, 32, 124-136.
37. Zingeser, L.B., & Berndt, R.S. (1990). Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia. Brain and Language, 39, 14-32.