Wetting and roughness

Annual Review of Materials Research

Volumn 38, Issue , 2008, Pages 71-99

  Quéré, David ^a  

^a ESPCI   (France)

Author keywords

Microtextures; Slip; Superhydrophobicity; Wicking

Indexed keywords

CONTACT ANGLE; HYDROPHOBICITY;

APPARENT CONTACT ANGLE; CONTACT ANGLE HYSTERESIS; MICRO TEXTURE; SLIP; SUPERHYDROPHOBICITY; SUPEROLEOPHOBICITY; WETTING PROPERTY; WICKING;

WETTING;

EID: 50249138386     PISSN: 15317331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.132434     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. Young T. 1805. An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 95:65-87
2. Leidenfrost JG. 1996. On the fixation of water in diverse fire. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 9:1153-66
3. Shafrin EG, Zisman WA. 1964. Upper limits to the contact angles of liquids on solids. In Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion: Advances in Chemistry Series, Vol. 43, ed. RF Gould, pp. 145-57. Washington, DC: Am. Chem. Soc.
4. De Gennes PG. 1985. Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57:827-63
5. Furmidge CGL. 1962. Studies at phase interfaces. 1. The sliding of liquid drops on solid surfaces and a theory for spray retention. J. Colloid Sci. 17:309-314
6. Dussan WEB, Chow RTP. 1983. On the ability of drops or bubbles to stick to nonhorizontal surfaces of solids. J Fluid. Mech. 137:1-29
7. Oliver JF, Huh C, Mason SG. 1977. Resistance to spreading of liquids by sharp edges. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 59:568-81
8. Johnson RE, Dettre RH. 1964. Contact angle hysteresis. I, Study of an idealized rough surface. In Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion: Advances in Chemistry Series, Vol. 43, ed. RF Gould, pp. 112-35. Washington, DC Am. Chem. Soc.
9. Wenzel RN. 1936. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind. Eng. Chem. 28:988-94
10. Swain PS, Lipowsky R. 1998. Contact angles on heterogeneous surfaces: a new look at Cassie's and Wenzel's laws. Langmuir 14:6772-80
11. Wolansky G, Marmur A, 1998. The actual contact angle on a heterogeneous rough surface in three dimensions. Langmuir 14:5292-97
12. Wolansky G, Marmur A. 1999. Apparent contact angles on rough surfaces: the Wenzel equation revisited. Colloids Surf A 156:381-88
13. Borgs C, de Coninck J, Kotecký R, Zinque M. 1995. Does the roughness of the substrate enhance wetting? Phys. Rev. Lett. 74:2292-94
14. Checco A, Guenoun P, Daillant J. 2003. Nonlinear dependence of the contact angle of nanodroplets on contact line curvature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91:186101
15. Onda T, Shibuichi S, Satoh N, Tsujii K. 1996. Super-water-repellent fractal surfaces. Langmuir 12:2125-27
16. Shibuichi S, Onda T, Satoh N, Tsujii K. 1996. Super water-repellent surfaces resulting from fractal structure. J. Phys. Chem. 100:19512-17
17. Norton FJ. 1945. U.S. Patent No. 2,386,259
18. Gao L, McCarthy TJ. 2006. "Artificial lotus leaf" prepared using a 1945 patent and a commercial textile. Langmuir 22:5998-6000
19. Neinhuis C, Barthlntt W. 1997. Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces. Ann. Bot. 79:667-77
20. Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. 1997. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces, Planta 202:1-8
21. Wagner T, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. 1996. Wettability and contaminability of insect wings as a function of their surface sculptures. Acta Zool. 77:213-25
22. Parker AR, Lawrence CR. 2001. Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature 414:33-34
23. Gao X, Jiang L. 2004, Biophysics: water-repellent legs of water striders. Nature 432:36
24. Bush JWM, Hu D, Prakash M. 2008. The integument of waterwalking arthropods: form and function. Adv. Insect Physiol. 34:117-92
25. Pliny the Elder. 2004. Natural History: A Selection, transl. ed. JF. Healey. London: Penguin, Rev. ed.
26. Dufour L. 1833. Recherches Anatomiques et Physiologiques sur les Hémiptères Accompagnées de Considérations Relatives à l'Histoire Naturelle et à la Classification de Ces Insectes. Extr. Mém. Savans Etrang., Tome IV, Paris: Inipr. Bachelier
27. Fogg GE. 1944. Diurnal fluctuation in a physical property of leaf cuticle. Nature 154:515
28. Cassie ABD, Baxter S. 1945. Large contact angles of plant and animal surfaces. Nature 155:21-22
29. Herminghaus S. 2000. Roughness-induced nonwetting. Europhys. Lett. 52:165-70
30. Minko S, Muller M, Motomov M, Nitschke M, Grundke K, et al. 2003. Two-level structured self-adaptive surfaces with reversibly tunable properties. JACS 125:3896-900
31. Patankar NA. 2004. Mimicking the lotus effect: influence of double roughness structures and slender pillars. Langmuir 20:8209-213
32. Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Newton MI, Chabrol C, Perry CC. 2004. Dual-scale roughness produces unusually water-repellent surfaces. Adv. Mater. 16:1929-32
33. Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Newton MI, Perry CC. 2005. Wettingand wetting transitions on copper-based superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 21:937-43
34. Gao L, McCarthy TJ. 2006. The "lotus effect" explained: two reasons why two length scales of topography are important. Langmuir 22:2966-67
35. Bhushan B, Jung YC. 2006. Micro- and nanoscale characterization of hydrophobic and hydrophilic leaf surfaces. Nanotechnology 17:2758-72
36. Nosonovsky M. 2007. Multiscale roughness and stability of superhydrophobic biomimetic interfaces. Langmuir 23:3157-61
37. Gao L, McCarthy TJ. 2007. A commercially available perfectly hydrophobic material. Langmuir 23:9125-27
38. 2 surfaces. Adv. Mater. 10:135-38
39. Wagner P, Furstner R, Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. 2003. Quantitative assessment to the structural basis of water repellency in natural and technical surfaces. J. Exp. Bot. 54:1295-1303
40. Gao XF, Yan X, Yao X, Xu L, Zhang K, et al. 2007. The dry-style antifogging properties of mosquito compound eyes and artificial analogues prepared by soft lithography. Adv. Mater. 19:2213-15
41. Bormashenko E, Bormashenko Y, Stein T, Whyman G, Bormashenko E. 2007. Why do pigeon feathers repel water? Hydrophobicity of pennae, Cassie-Baxter wetting hypothesis and Cassie-Wenzel capillarity-induced wetting transition. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 311:212-16
42. Lee W. Jin MK, Yoo WC, Lee JK. 2004. Nanostructuring of a polymeric substrate with well-defined nanometer-scale topography and tailored surface wettability. Langmuir 20:7665-69
43. Thorpe WH. 1950. Plastron respiration in aquatic insects. Biol. Rev. 25:344-90
44. Noble-Xesbitt J. 1963. Transpiration in Podura aquatica L. (Collembola, Isotomidae) and the wetting properties of its cuticle. J. Exp. Biol. 40:681-700
45. Heckman CW. 1983. Comparative morphology of arthropod exterior surfaces with the capability of binding a film of air underwater. Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 68:715-36
46. Vogel S. 2006. Living in a physical world. VIII. Gravity and life in water. J. Biosci. 30:309-22
47. Marmur A. 2006. Underwater superhydrophobicity: theoretical feasibility. Langmuir 22:1400-2
48. Shirtcliffe NJ, McHale G, Newton MI, Perry CC, Pyatt AJ. 2006. Plastron properties of a superhydrophobic surface. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89:104600
49. Nakajima A, Hashimoto K. Watanabe T. 2001. Recent studies on superhydrophobic films. Monatshefte Chim. 132:31-41
50. Feng X, Jiang L. 2006. Design and creation of superwetting/antiwetting surfaces. Adv. Mater. 18:3063-78
51. Gao L, McCarthy TJ. 2006. A perfectly hydrophobic surface. JACS 128:9052-53
52. Lau KKS, Bico J, Teo KBK, Chhowalla M, Amaratunga GAJ, et al. 2003. Superhydrophobic carbon nanotube forests. Nano Lett. 3:1701-5
53. Tuteja A, Choi W, Ma M, Mabry JM, Mazzella SA, et al. 2007. Designing superoleophobic surfaces. Science 318:1618-22
54. Ishino C, Reyssat M, Reyssat E, Okumura K, Quéré D. 2007. Wicking within forests of micropillars. EPL 79:56005
55. Courbin L, Denieul E, Dressaire E, Ajdari A, Roper M, et al. 2007. Imbibition by polygonal spreading on microdecorated surfaces. Nat. Mater. 6:661-64
56. Bico J, Tordeux C. Quéré D. 2001. Rough wetting. Europhys. Lett. 55:214-20
57. Cassie ABD, Baxter S. 1944. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc. 40:546-50
58. Cassie ABD. 1948. Contact angles. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 3:11-16
59. Washburn EW. 1921. The dynamics of capillary flow. Phys. Rev. 17:273-83
60. Cazabat AM, Cohen-Stuart MAC. 1986. Dynamics of wetting: effects of surface roughness. J. Phys. Chem. 90:5845-49
61. Apel-Paz M, Marmur A. 1999. Spreading of liquids on rough surfaces. Colloids Surf. A 146:273-79
62. Rye RR, Mann JA, Yost FG. 1996. The flow of liquids in surface grooves. Langmuir 12:555-65
63. Bico J, Thiele U, Quéré D. 2002. Wetting of textured surfaces. Colloids Surf. A 206:41-46
64. Patankar N. 2003. On the modeling of hydrophobic contact angles on rough surfaces. Langmuir 19:1249-53
65. Alberti G, DeSimone A. 2005. Wetting of rough surfaces: a homogenization approach. Proc. R. Soc. London Sci: A 461:79-97
66. Lafuma A, Quéré D. 2003. Superhydrophobic states. Nat. Mater. 2:457-60
67. Marmur A. 2004. The lotus effect: superhydrophobicity and metastability. Langmuir 20:3517-19
68. Rathgen H, Sugiyama K, OhI CD, Lohse D, Mugele F. 2007. Nanometer-resolved collective niicromeniscus oscillations through optical diffraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99:214501
69. BicoJ, Marzolin C, Quéré D. 1999. Pearl drops. Europhys. Lett. 47:220-26
70. Callies M, Quéré D. 2005. On water repellency. Soft Matter 1:55-61
71. Oner D, McCarthy TJ. 2000. Ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Effects of topography length scales on wettability. Langmuir 16:7777-82
72. Gu ZZ, Uetsuka H, Takahashi K, Nakajima R, Onishi H, et al. 2003. Structural color and the lotus effect. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42:894-97
73. Krupenkin TN, Taylor JA, Schneider TM, Yang S. 2004. From rolling ball to complete wetting: the dynamic tuning of liquids on nanustructured surfaces. Langmuir 20:3824-27
74. 3 coating films with high transparency by the sol-gel method. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 80:1040-42
75. Nakajima A, Fujishima A, Hashimoto K, Watanabe T. 1999. Preparation of transparent superhydrophobic boehmite and silica films by sublimation of aluminum acetylacctonatc. Adv. Mater. 11:1365-68
76. Nakajima A, Hashimoto K, Watanabe T, Takai K, Yamauchi G, et al. 2000. Transparent superhydrophobic thin films with self-cleaning properties. Langmuir 16:7044-47
77. Richard D, Quéré D. 2000. Bouncing water drops. Europhys. Lett. 50:769-75
78. Extrand CW. 2002. Model for contact angles and hysteresis on rough and ultraphobic surfaces. Langmuir 18:7991-99
79. McHale Ci, Shirtcliffe NJ, Newton MI. 2004. Contact-angle hysteresis on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 20:10146-49
80. Extrand CW. 2006. Designing for optimal water repellency. Langmuir 22:1711-14
81. Gao LC, McCarthy TJ. 2006. Contact angle hysteresis explained. Langmuir 22:6234-37
82. Kusumaatmaja H, Yeomans JM. 2007. Modeling contact angle hysteresis on chemically patterned and superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 23:6019-32
83. DeSimone A, Grunewald N, Otto F, 2007. A new model for contact angle hysteresis. Netw. Heterog. Media 2:211-25
84. Joanny JF, de Gennes PG. 1984. A model for contact angle hysteresis. J. Chem. Phys. 81:552-62
85. Pomeau Y, Vannimenus J. 1985. Contact angle on heterogeneous surfaces: weak heterogeneities, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 104:477-88
86. Quéré D, Azzopardi MJ, Delattre L. 1998. Drops at rest on a tilted plane Langmuir 14:2213-16
87. Patankar NA. 2004, Transition between superhydrophobic states on rough surfaces. Langmuir 20:7097-102
88. Ishino C, Okumura K, Quéré D. 2004. Wetting transitions on rough surfaces. Europhys. Lett. 68:419-25
89. Barbieri L, Wagner F, Hoffmann P. 2004. Water wetting transition parameters of perfluorinated substrates with periodically distributed flat-top microscale obstacles. Langmuir 23:1723-34
90. Carbone G, Mangialardi L. 2005. Hydrophobic properties of a wavy rough substrate. Eur. Phy. J. E 16:67-76
91. Bormashenko E, Pogreb R, Whyman G, Bormashenko Y, Erlich M. 2007. Vibration-induced Cassic-Wenzel wetting transition on rough surfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90:201917
92. Reyssat M, Pépin A, Marty F, Chen Y, Quéré D. 2006. Bouncing transitions on microtextured materials. Europhys. Lett. 74:306-12
93. Bartolo D, Bouamrirene F, Vemeuil E, Buguin A, Silberzan P, et al. 2006, Bouncing or sticky droplets: impalement transitions on superhydrophobic micropatterned surfaces. Europhys. Lett. 74:299-305
94. Sbragaglia M, Peters AM, Pirat C, Borkent BM, Lammertink RGH, et al. 2007. Spontaneous breakdown of superhydrophobicity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99:156001
95. McHale G, Aqil S, Shirtcliffe NJ, Newton MI, Erbil HY. 2005. Analysis of droplet evaporation on a superhydrophobic surface. Langmuir 21:11053-60
96. Reyssat M, Yeomans JM, Quéré D. 2008. Impalement of fakir drops. EPL 81:26006
97. Morra M, Occhiello E, Garbassi F. 1989. Contact angle hysteresis in oxygen plasma treated poly(tetrafluoroethylene). Langmuir 5:872-76
98. Chen W, Fadeev AY, Hsieh MC, Öner D, Youngblood J, et al. 1999. Ultrahydrophobic and ultralyophobic surfaces: some comments and examples. Langmuir 15:3395-99
99. Teare DOH, Spanos CG, Ridley P, Kinmond EJ, Roucoules V, et al. 2002. Pulsed plasma deposition of superhydrophobic nanospheres. Chem. Mater. 14:4566-71
100. Woodward I, Schofield WCE, Roucoules V, Badyal JPS. 2003. Super-hydrophobic surfaces produced by plasma fluorination of polybutadiene films. Langmuir 19:3432-38
101. Otten A, Herminghaus S. 2004. How plants keep dry: a physicist's point of view. Langmuir 20:2405-8
102. Ahuja A, Taylor JA, Lifton V, Sidorenko AA, Salamon TR, et al. 2008. Nanonails: a simple geometrical approach to electrically tunable superlyophobic surfaces. Langmuir 24:9-14
103. Yoshimitsu Z, Nakajima A, Watanabe T, Hashimoto K. 2002. Effects of surface structure on the hydrophobicity and sliding behavior of water droplets. Langmuir 18:5818-22
104. Chen Y, He B, Lee JH, Patankar NA. 2005. Anisotropy in the wetting of rough surfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 281:458-64
105. Chung JY, Youngblood JP, Stafford CM. 2007. Anisotropic wetting on tunable microwrinkled surfaces. Soft Matter 3:1163-69
106. Berthier S. 2007. Iridescences: The Physical Colors of Insects. New York: Springer
107. Zhang XT, Sato O, Fujishima A. 2004. Water ultrarepellency induced by nanocolumnar ZnO surface Langmuir 20:6065-67
108. Feng X, Feng L, Jin M, Zhai J, Jiang L, et al. 2004. Reversible superhydrophobicity to superhydrophilicity transition of aligned ZnO nanorod films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126:62-63
109. Sun T, Wang G, Feng L, Liu B, Ma Y, et al. 2004. Reversible switching between superhydrophilicity and superhydrophobicity. Chem. Int. Ed. 43:357-60
110. Krupenkin TN, Taylor JA, Wang EN, Kolodner P, Hodes P, et al. 2007. Reversible wetting-dewetting transitions on electrically tunable superhydrophobic nanostructured surfaces. Langmuir 23:9128-33
111. Nahre RD, Beysens DA. 2004. Nucleation and growth on a superhydrophobic grooved surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93:076103
112. Cheng YT, Rodak DE. 2005. Is the lotus leaf superhydrophobic? Appl. Phys. Lett. 86:144101
113. Cheng YT, Rodak DE, Angelopoulos A, Gacek T. 2005. Microscopic observations of condensation of water on lotus leaves. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86:194112
114. Wier KA, McCarthy TJ. 2006. Condensation on ultrahydrophobic surfaces and its effect on droplet mobility: Ultrahydrophobic surfaces are not always water repeliam. Langmuir 22:2433-36
115. Dorrer C, Rühe J. 2007. Condensation and wetting transitions on microstructured ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 23:3820-24
116. Cottin-Bizonne C, Cross B, Steinberger A, Charlaix E. 2005. Boundary slip on smooth hydrophobic surfaces: intrinsic effects and possible artifacts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94:056102
117. Cottin-Bizonne C, Barrat JL, Bocquet L, Charlaix E. 2003. Low-friction flows of liquid at nanopatterned interfaces. Nat. Mater. 2:237-40
118. Ou J, Perot B, Rothstein JP. 2004. Laminar drag reduction in microchannels using ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 16:4635-13
119. Ou J, Rothstein JP. 2005, Direct velocity measurements of the flow past drag-reducing ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 17:103606
120. Truesdell R, Mammoli A, Vorobieff P, van Swol F, Brinker CJ. 2006. Drag reduction on a patterned superhydrophobic surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97:044504
121. Roach P, McHale G, Evans CR, Shirtcliffe NJ, Newton MI. 2007. Decoupling of the liquid response of a superhydrophobic quartz crystal microbalance. Langmuir 23:9823-30
122. Joseph P, Cottin-Bizonne C, Benoit JM, Ybert C, Journet C, et al. 2006. Slippage of water past superhydrophobic carbon nanotube forests in microchannels, Phys. Rev, Lett. 97:156104
123. Richardson S. 1973. On the no-slip boundary condition. J. Fluid Mech. 59:707-19
124. Steinberger A, Cottin-Bizonne C, Kleimann P, Charlaix E. 2007. High friction on a bubble mattress. Nat. Mater. 6:665-68
125. Ybert C, Barentin C, Cottin-Bizonne C, Joseph P, Bocquet L. 2007. Achieving large slip with superhydrophobic surfaces: scaling laws for generic geometries. Phys. Fluids 19:123601
126. Philip JR. 1972. Flows satisfying mixed no-slip and no-shear conditions. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 23:353-70
127. Philip JR. 1972. Integral properties of flows satisfying mixed no-slip and no-shear conditions. Z. Angeu. Math. Phys. 23:960-68
128. Lauga E, Stone HA. 2003. Effective slip in pressure-driven Stokes flow, J. Fluid Mech. 489:55-77