Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy

Urologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 415-424

  Duchene, David A ^a   Winfield, Howard N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY FAILURE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPIC DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NEPHRECTOMY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROPERITONEAL SURGICAL APPROACH; REVIEW; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSPERITONEAL SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT INDICATION; UNITED STATES;

HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; NEPHRECTOMY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 50149084315     PISSN: 00940143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2008.05.014     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. 2006 Annual report of the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: transplant data 1996-2005. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Healthcare Systems Bureau, Division of Transplantation, Rockville (MD); United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA; University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MI.
2. Ratner L.E., Ciseck L.J., Moore R.G., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60 9 (1995) 1047-1049
3. Clayman R.V., Kavoussi L.R., Soper N.J., et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146 2 (1991) 278-282
4. Gill I.S., Carbone J.M., Clayman R.V., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Endourol 8 2 (1994) 143-148
5. Ratner L.E., Montgomery R.A., and Kavoussi L.R. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the four-year Johns Hopkins University experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14 9 (1999) 2090-2093
6. Philosophe B., Kuo P.C., Schweitzer E.J., et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 68 4 (1999) 497-502
7. Ratner L.E., Montgomery R.A., and Kavoussi L.R. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. A review of the first 5 years. Urol Clin North Am 28 4 (2001) 709-719
8. Kasiske B.L., Ravenscraft M., Ramos E.L., et al. The evaluation of living renal transplant donors: clinical practice guidelines. Ad Hoc Clinical Practice Guidelines Subcommittee of the Patient care and Education Committee of the American Society of Transplant Physicians. J Am Soc Nephrol 7 11 (1996) 2288-2313
9. Live Organ Donor Consensus Group. Consensus statement on the live organ donor. JAMA 284 (2000) 2919-2926
10. Schlunt L.B., Harper J.D., Broome D.R., et al. Improved detection of renal vascular anatomy using multidetector CT angiography: is 100% detection possible?. J Endourol 21 1 (2007) 12-17
11. Kim J., Kim C., Jang M., et al. Can magnetic resonance angiogram be a reliable alternative for donor evaluation for laparoscopic nephrectomy?. Clin Transplant 21 (2007) 126-135
12. Bhatti A.A., Chugtai A., Haslam P., et al. Prospective study comparing three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors. BJU Int 96 (2005) 1105-1108
13. Mandal A., Cohen C., and Montgomery R.A. Should the indications for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same for the open procedure? Anomalous left renal vasculature is not a contraindication to laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 71 5 (2001) 660-664
14. Troppmann C., Wiesmann K., McVicar J.P., et al. Increased transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries in the laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy era: surgical technique and surgical and nonsurgical donor and recipient outcomes. Arch Surg 136 8 (2001) 897-907
15. Lin C.H., Steinberg A.P., Ramani A.P., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in the presence of circumaortic or retro-aortic left renal vein. J Urol 171 1 (2004) 44-46
16. Ratner L.E., Kavoussi L.R., Chavin K.D., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: technical considerations and allograft vascular length. Transplantation 65 12 (1998) 1657-1658
17. Buell J.F., Edye M., Johnson M., et al. Are concerns over right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy unwarranted?. Ann Surg 233 5 (2001) 645-651
18. Diner E.K., Radolinski B., Murdock J.D., et al. Right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the Washington Hospital experience. Urology 68 6 (2006) 1175-1177
19. Buell J.F., Abreu S.C., Hanaway M.J., et al. Right donor nephrectomy: a comparison of hand-assisted transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic approaches. Transplantation 77 4 (2004) 521-525
20. McDougal E.M., Monk T.G., Wolf J.S., et al. The effect of prolonged pneumoperitoneum on renal function in an animal model. J Am Coll Surg 182 4 (1996) 317-328
21. Lind M.Y., Hazebroek E.J., Bajema I.M., et al. Effect of prolonged warm ischemia and pneumoperitoneum on renal function in a rat syngeneic kidney transplantation model. Surg Endosc 20 7 (2006) 1113-1118
22. Mertens zur Borg I.R., Di Biase M., Verbrugge S., et al. Comparison of three perioperative fluid regimes for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized dose-finding study. Surg Endosc (2007) [epub ahead of print]
23. Bergman S., Feldman L.S., Carli F., et al. Intraoperative fluid management in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: challenging the dogma. Surg Endosc 18 11 (2004) 1625-1630
24. Giessing M., Turk I., Roigas J., et al. Laparoscopy for living donor nephrectomy-particularities of the currently applied techniques. Transpl Int 18 9 (2005) 1019-1027
25. Ruszat R., Sulser T., Dickenmann M., et al. Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: donor outcome and complication rate in comparison with three different techniques. World J Urol 24 1 (2006) 113-117
26. Dunkin B.J., Johnson L.B., and Kuo P.C. A technical modification eliminates early ureteral complications after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 190 1 (2000) 96-97
27. Chan D.Y., Fabrizio M.D., Ratner L.E., et al. Complications of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the first 175 cases. Transplant Proc 32 4 (2000) 778
28. Kerbl K., Chandhoke P.S., Clayman R.V., et al. Ligation of the renal pedicle during laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of staples, clips, and sutures. J Laparoendosc Surg 3 1 (1993) 9-12
29. Baumert H., Ballaro A., Arroyo C., et al. The use of polymer (Hem-o-lok) clips for management of the renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy. Eur Urol 49 5 (2006) 816-819
30. Meng M.V., Freise C.E., Kang S.M., et al. Techniques to optimize vascular control during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 61 1 (2003) 93-97
31. Winfield H.N. Survey of endourology: laparoscopy. J Endourol 20 11 (2006) 852-854
32. Sundaram C.P., Bargman V., and Bernie J.E. Methods of vascular control during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Endourol 20 7 (2006) 467-469
33. Turk I.A., Giessing M., Deger S., et al. Laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy: a new technique with preservation of vascular length. Transplant Proc 35 2 (2003) 838-841
34. Deng D.Y., Meng M.V., Nguyen H.T., et al. Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure. Urology 60 3 (2002) 415-419
35. Friedman A., Peters T.G., Jones K.W., et al. Fatal and nonfatal hemorrhagic complications of living kidney donation. Ann Surg 243 1 (2006) 126-130
36. Sulser T., Gurke L., Langer I., et al. Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: first clinical experiences in 19 operations. J Endourol 18 3 (2004) 257-262
37. Wolf J.S., Tchetgan M.B., and Merion R.M. Hand-assisted laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urology 52 5 (1998) 885-887
38. Ruiz-Deya G., Cheng S., Palmer E., et al. Open donor, laparoscopic donor, and hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes. J Urol 166 4 (2001) 1270-1273
39. Velidedeoglu E., Williams N., Brayman K.L., et al. Comparison of open, laparoscopic and hand-assisted approaches to live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 74 2 (2002) 169-172
40. Horgan S., Galvani C., Gorodner M.V., et al. Effect of robotic assistance on the learning curve for laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 21 9 (2007) 1512-1517
41. Jacobs S.C., Cho E., Dunkin B.J., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience. J Urol 164 5 (2000) 1494-1499
42. Shalhav A.L., Siqueira T.M., Gardner T.A., et al. Manual specimen retrieval without a pneumoperitoneum-preserving device for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Urol 168 3 (2002) 941-944
43. Wolf J.S., Merion R.M., Leichtman A.B., et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical, live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 72 2 (2001) 284-290
44. Brook N.R., Harper S.J., Bagul A., et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy yields kidney with structure and function equivalent to those retrieved by open surgery. Transplant Proc 37 2 (2005) 625-626
45. Oyen O., Andersen M., Mathisen L., et al. Laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety. Transplantation 79 9 (2005) 1236-1240
46. Simforoosh N., Basiri A., Tabibi A., et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 95 6 (2005) 851-855
47. Andersen M.H., Mathisen L., Oyen O., et al. Postoperative pain and convalescence in living kidney donors-laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: a randomized study. Am J Transplant 6 6 (2006) 1438-1443
48. Kok N.F., Lind M.Y., Hansson B.M., et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and mini-incision open donor nephrectomy: single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. BMJ 333 7561 (2006) 221
49. Wilson C.H., Bhatti A.A., Rix D.A., et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: UK experience. BJU Int 95 1 (2005) 131-135
50. Jacobs S.C., Cho E., Foster C., et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol 171 1 (2004) 47-51
51. Breda A., Bui M.H., Liao J.C., et al. Association of bowel rest and ketorolac analgesia with short hospital stay after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 69 5 (2007) 828-831
52. Lind M.Y., Liem Y.S., Bemelman W.A., et al. Live donor nephrectomy and return to work: does the operative technique matter?. Surg Endosc 17 4 (2003) 591-595
53. Leventhal J.R., Deeik R.K., Joehl R.J., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy-is it safe?. Transplantation 70 4 (2000) 602-606
54. Rawlins M.C., Hefty T.L., Brown S.L., et al. Learning laparoscopic donor nephrectomy safely: a report on 100 cases. Arch Surg 137 5 (2002) 531-534
55. Sundaram C.P., Martin G.L., Guise A., et al. Complications after a 5-year experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the Indiana University Experience. Surg Endosc 21 5 (2007) 724-728
56. Abreu S.C., Goldfarb D.A., Derweesh I., et al. Factors related to delayed graft function after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Urol 171 1 (2004) 52-57
57. Rizvi S.A., Naqvi S.A., Jawad F., et al. Living kidney donor follow-up in a dedicated clinic. Transplantation 79 9 (2005) 1247-1251
58. Sansalone C.V., Maione G., Aseni P., et al. Early and late residual renal function and surgical complications in living donors: a 15-year experience at a single institution. Transplant Proc 38 4 (2006) 994-995
59. Shokeir A.A. Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry. J Urol 178 5 (2007) 1860-1866
60. Schweitzer EJ, Wilson J, Jacobs S, et al. Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 232(3):392-400.
61. Breda A., Veale J., Liao J., et al. Complications of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and their management: the UCLA experience. Urology 69 1 (2007) 49-52
62. Su L., Ratner L.E., Montgomery R.A., et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 240 2 (2004) 358-363