Position-specific residue preference features around the ends of helices and strands and a novel strategy for the prediction of secondary structures

Protein Science

Volumn 17, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1505-1512

  Duan, Mojie ^a   Huang, Min ^a   Ma, Chuang ^a   Li, Lun ^a   Zhou, Yanhong ^a  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Ends of secondary structures; Position specific residue preference; Protein structure prediction; Secondary structure prediction

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 50049099447     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: 1469896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.035691.108     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aurora, R., Srinivasan, R., and Rose, G.D. 1994. Rules for α-helix termination by glycine. Science 264: 1126-1130.
2. Baker, D. and Sali, A. 2001. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 294: 93-96.
3. Baldwin, R.L. and Rose, G.D. 1999. Is protein folding hierarchic? I. Local structure and peptide folding. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24: 26-33.
4. Bao, L. and Cui, Y. 2005. Prediction of the phenotypic effects of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms using structural and evolutionary information. Bioinformatics 21: 2185-2190.
5. Blader, M., Zhang, X.J., and Matthews, B.W. 1993. Structural basis of amino acid α-helix propensity. Science 260: 1637-1640.
6. Chasman, D. and Adams, R.M. 2001. Predicting the functional consequences of non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms: Structure-based assessment of amino acid variation. J. Mol. Biol. 307: 683-706.
7. Chou, P.Y. and Fasman, G.D. 1974. Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, -sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. Biochemistry 13: 211-222.
8. Cuff, J.A. and Barton, G.J. 1999. Evaluation and improvement of multiple sequence methods for protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins 34: 508-519.
9. Dunbrack, R.L. 1999. Sequence comparison and protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 16: 374-384.
10. Dwyer, M.A., Looger, L.L., and Hellinga, H.W. 2004. Computational design of a biologically active enzyme. Science 304: 1967-1971.
11. Garnier, J., Osguthorpe, D.J., and Robson, B. 1978. Analysis and implications of simple methods for predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 120: 97-120.
12. Guo, J., Chen, H., Sun, Z.R., and Lin, Y.L. 2004. A novel method for protein secondary structure prediction using dual-layer SVM and profiles. Proteins 54: 738-743.
13. Hua, S.J. and Sun, Z.R. 2001. A novel method of protein secondary structure prediction with high segment overlap measure: Support vector machine approach. J. Mol. Biol. 308: 397-407.
14. Jones, D.T. 1999a. GenTHREADER: An efficient and reliable protein folding recognition method for genomic sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 287: 797-815.
15. Jones, D.T. 1999b. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific score matrix. J. Mol. Biol. 292: 195-202.
16. Kabsch, W. and Sander, C. 1983. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hudrogen bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22: 2577-2637.
17. Kim, H. and Park, H. 2003. Protein secondary structure prediction based on an improved support vector machines approach. Protein Eng. 16: 553-560.
18. Koehl, P. and Levitt, M. 1999. A bright future for protein structure prediction. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6: 108-111.
19. Lim, V.I. 1974. Algorithms for prediction of a-helices and structural regions in globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 88: 872-894.
20. Matthews, B.W. 1975. Comparison of the prediction and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 405: 442-451.
21. Padmanabhan, S., Marquesee, S., Ridgeway, T., Laue, T.M., and Baldwin, R.L. 1990. Relative helix-forming tendencies of nonpolar amino acids. Nature 344: 268-270.
22. Presta, L.G. and Rose, G.D. 1988. Helix signals in proteins. Science 240: 1632-1641.
23. Qian, N. and Sejnowski, T.J. 1988. Predicting the neural network models. J. Mol. Biol. 202: 865-884.
24. Qin, S.B., He, Y., and Pan, X.M. 2005. Predicting protein secondary structure and solvent accessibility with an improved multiple linear regression method. Proteins 61: 473-480.
25. Richardson, J.S. and Richardson, D.C. 1988. Amino acid preference for specific locations at the ends of helices. Science 240: 1648-1652.
26. Rost, B. 1997. Protein fold recognition by prediction based threading. J. Mol. Biol. 270: 1-10.
27. Rost, B. and Sander, C. 1993. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J. Mol. Biol. 232: 584-599.
28. Rost, B., Sander, C., and Schneider, R. 1994. Redefining the goals of protein secondary structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 235: 13-26.
29. Russell, R.B. and Barton, G.J. 1993. The limits of protein secondary structure prediction accuracy from multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 234: 951-957.
30. Russell, R.B., Copley, R.R., and Barton, G.J. 1996. Protein fold recognition by mapping predicted secondary structures. J. Mol. Biol. 259: 349-365.
31. Russell, R.B., Alber, F., Aloy, P., Davis, F.P., Korkin, D., Pochaud, M., Topf, M., and Sali, A. 2004. A structural perspective on protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14: 313-324.
32. Thiel, K.A. 2004. Structure-aided drug design's next generation. Nat. Biotechnol. 22: 513-519.
33. Wang, G. and Dunbrack, J.R. 2003. PISCES: A protein sequence-culling serve. Bioinformatics 19: 1589-1591.
34. Watson, J.D., Laskowski, R.A., and Thornton, J.M. 2005. Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15: 275-284.
35. Zemla, A., Venclovas, C., Fidelis, K., and Rost, B. 1999. A modified definition of Sov, a segment-based measure for protein secondary structure prediction assessment. Proteins 34: 220-223.