Black-fruited hawthorns of western North America - One or more agamic complexes?

Botany

Volumn 86, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 846-865

  Dickinson, Timothy A ^a,b   Lo, Eugenia Y Y ^b   Talent, Nadia ^a   Love, Rhoda M ^c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Apomixis; Brevispinae; Crataegus; Douglasianae; Leaf shape; Rosaceae

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; DICOTYLEDON; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; POLYPLOIDY; TAXONOMY;

NORTH AMERICA; ROCKY MOUNTAINS;

CRATAEGUS; CRATAEGUS BRACHYACANTHA; ROSACEAE; VACCINIUM;

EID: 49449102131     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B08-072     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Albarouki, E., and Peterson, A. 2007. Molecular and morphological characterization of Crataegus L. species (Rosaceae) in southern Syria. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 153: 255-263. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00607.x.
2. Asker, S.E., and Jerling, L. 1992. Apomixis in plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
3. Beadle, C.D. 1902. New species of thorns from the southeastern states. II. Biltmore Bot. Stud. 1: 51-137.
4. Beatty, B.L., Jennings, W.F., and Rawlinson, R.C. 2004. Crataegus saligna Greene (willow hawthorn): a technical conservation assessment. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. [Online]. Available from www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/crataegussaligna.pdf [accessed 30 September 2007].
5. Brown, H.B. 1910. The genus Crataegus with some theories of the origin of its species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club, 37: 251-260. doi:10.2307/2479407.
6. Brunsfeld, S.J., and Johnson, F.D. 1990. Cytological, morphological, ecological and phenological support for specific status of Crataegus suksdorfii (Sarg.) Kruschke. Madroño, 37: 274-282.
7. Burtt, B.L. 1970. Infraspecific categories in flowering plants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2: 233-238. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1970.tb01871.x.
8. Campbell, C.S., and Wright, W.A. 1996. Apomixis, hybridization, and taxonomic complexity in eastern North American Amelanchier (Rosaceae). Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon. 31: 345-354. doi:10.1007/BF02815379.
9. Campbell, C.S., Greene, C.W., and Dickinson, T.A. 1991. Reproductive biology in subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst. Bot. 16: 333-349. doi:10.2307/2419284.
10. Campbell, C.S., Evans, R.C., Morgan, D.R., Dickinson, T.A., and Arsenault, M.P. 2007. Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae, Rosaceae): limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history. Plant Syst. Evol. 266: 119-145. doi:10.1007/s00606-007-0545-y.
11. Chevenet, F., Brun, C., Banuls, A.L., Jacq, B., and Christen, R. 2006. TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees.[Online]. BMC Bioinformatics, 7. Article No. 439. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-439. PMID:17032440.
12. Christensen, K.I. 1992. Revision of Crataegus Sect. Crataegus and Nothosect. Crataeguineae (Rosaceae-Maloideae) in the Old World. Syst. Bot. Monogr. 35: 1-199.
13. Clark, L.A., and Pregibon, D. 1992. Tree-based models. Chapter 9. In Statistical models in S. Edited by J.M. Chambers, and T.J. Hastie. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Pacific Grove Calif. pp. 377-419.
14. Coyne, J.A., and Orr, H.A. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass.
15. Detling, L. 1968. Historical background of the flora of the Pacific Northwest. Vol. 13. Museum of Natural History, University of Oregon. Eugene, Ore. pp. 1-57
16. Dibble, A.C., Wright, W.A., Campbell, C.S., and Greene, C.W. 1998. Quantitative morphology of the Amelanchier agamic complex (Rosaceae) at a Maine site. Syst. Bot. 23: 3141. doi:10.2307/2419572.
17. Dickinson, T.A. 1986. Topodeme differentiation in Ontario taxa of Crataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae): Leaf morphometric evidence. Can. J. Bot. 64: 2738-2747. doi:10.1136/b86-363.
18. Dickinson, T.A. 1999. Species concepts in agamic complexes. In Evolution in man-made habitats. Edited by L.W.D.v. Raamsdonk, and J.C.M.d. Nijs. Institute for Systematics & Ecology, Amsterdam, Netherlands. pp. 319-339.
19. Dickinson, T.A. 2003. Hybridization in Crataegus - Leaf shape. [Online]. Available from www.botany.utoronto.ca/faculty/dickinson/Hybridization. HTML#Leaf_shape [accessed 30 April 2005].
20. Dickinson, T.A., and Phipps, J.B. 1984. Studies in Crataegus L. (Rosaceae: Maloideae) IX. Short-shoot leaf heteroblasty in Crataegus crus-galli L. sensu lato. Can. J. Bot. 62: 1775-1780. doi:10.1139/b84-241.
21. Dickinson, T.A., and Phipps, J.B. 1986. Studies in Crataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae) XIV. The breeding system of Crataegus crus galli sensu lato in Ontario (Canada). Am. J. Bot. 73: 116-130. doi:10.2307/2444284.
22. Dickinson, T.A., and Love, R.M. 1997. North American black-fruited hawthorns: III. What IS Douglas hawthorn? In Conservation and management of Oregon's native flora. Edited by T. Kaye, A. Liston, R.M. Love, D.L. Luoma, R.J. Meinke, and M.V. Wilson. Native Plant Society of Oregon, Corvallis, Ore. pp. 162-171.
23. Dickinson, T.A., Lo, E., and Talent, N. 2007. Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications. Plant Syst. Evol. 266: 59-78. doi:10.1007/s00606-007-0541-2.
24. Dickinson, T.A., Belaoussoff, S., Love, R.M., and Muniyamma, M. 1996. North American black-fruited hawthorns: I. Variation in floral construction, breeding system correlates, and their possible evolutionary significance in Crataegus sect. Douglasii Loudon. Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon. 31: 355-371. doi:10.1007/BF02815380.
25. Dickman, A. 1980. Introgression and hybridization among Willamette Valley hawthorns. Unpublished report, University of Oregon, Eugene, Ore. 7 pp.
26. Dorken, M.E., and Barrett, S.C.H. 2004. Phenotypic plasticity of vegetative and reproductive traits in monoecious and dioecious populations of Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae): a clonal aquatic plant. J. Ecol. 92: 32-44. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2004.00857.x.
27. Du Rietz, G.E. 1930. The fundamental units of biological taxonomy. Bot. Tidsskr. 24: 333-428.
28. Gabriel, K.R. 1971. The biplot graphical display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika, 58: 453-467. doi:10.1093/biomet/58.3.453.
29. Gianfranceschi, L., Seglias, N., Tarchini, R., Komjanc, M., and Gessler, C. 1998. Simple sequence repeats for the genetic analysis of apple. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 1069-1076. doi:10.1007/s001220050841.
30. Gittins, R. 1985. Canonical Analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
31. Gustafsson, A. 1947. Apomixis in higher plants. Part III. Biotype and species formation. In Lunds Univ. Arsskr., Avd. 2. pp. 183-370.
32. Heslop-Harrison, J. 1967. New concepts in flowering plant taxonomy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
33. Hickman, J.C. (Editor). 1993. The Jepson Manual - higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.
34. Hitchcock, C.L., and Cronquist, A. 1961. Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest - Part 3: Saxifragaceae to Ericaceae. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Wash.
35. Hörandl, E., and Paun, O. 2007. Patterns and sources of genetic diversity in apomictic plants: implications for evolutionary potentials. In Apomixis: evolution, mechanisms and perspectives. Edited by U. Grossniklaus, E. Hörandl, T. Sharbel, and P. van Dijk. Gantner Verlag Ruggell, Liechtenstein. pp. 169-194.
36. Insightful Corporation. 2005. S-Plus 7. Seattle, Wash.
37. Kincaid, D.T., and Schneider, R.B. 1983. Quantification of leaf shape with a microcomputer and Fourier transform. Can. J. Bot. 61: 2333-2342. doi:10.1139/b83-256.
38. Leaf Architecture Working Group. 1999. Manual of leaf architecture - morphological description and categorization of dicotyledonous and net-veined monocotyledonous angiosperms. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
39. Legendre, L., and Legendre, P. 1998. Numerical Ecology. In Developments in environmental modelling. Edited by S.E. Jorgensen. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
40. Liebhard, R., Gianfranceschi, L., Koller, B., Ryder, C.D., Tarchini, R., Van de Weg, E., and Gessler, C. 2002. Development and characterisation of 140 new microsatellites in apple (Malus xdomestica Borkh.). Mol. Breed. 10: 217-241. doi:10.1023/A:1020525906332.
41. Lo, E. 2008. Global and fine scale molecular studies of polyploid evolution in Crataegus L. (Rosaceae). Ph.D. thesis, Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
42. Lo, E.Y.Y., Stefanović, S., and Dickinson, T.A. 2007. Molecular reappraisal of relationships between Crataegus and Mespilus (Pyreae, Rosaceae) - two genera or one? Syst. Bot. 32: 596-616. doi:10.1600/036364407782250562.
43. Lo, E.Y.Y., Stefanović, S., and Dickinson, T.A. 2008a. Detecting origins and inferring reticulate history in diploid-polyploid complexes of Crataegus series Douglasianae (Rosaceae) using tree and network approaches. Evolution, In press.
44. Lo, E.Y.Y., Stefanović, S., and Dickinson, T.A. 2008b. Population genetic structure of diploid sexuals and polyploid apomicts of Crataegus (hawthorns; Rosaceae) in the Pacific Northwest. Mol. Ecol., In press.
45. Lo, E.Y.Y., Stefanović, S., Christensen, K.I., and Dickinson, T.A. 2008c. Evidence for genetic affinity between the Eastern Asian and Western North American Crataegus L. (Rosaceae) and identification of putative hybrid species of the European and North American origins based on multiple DNA markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., In press.
46. Longley, A.E. 1924. Cytological studies in the genus Crataegus. Am. J. Bot. 11: 295-317. doi:10.2307/2435389.
47. Loudon, J.C. 1838. Arboretum et fruticetum brittanicum. Vol. 2. Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longmans, London, UK.
48. Love, R., and Feigen, M. 1978. Interspecific hybridization between native and naturalized Crataegus (Rosaceae) in western Oregon. Madroño, 25: 211-217.
49. Macklin, J.A., and Phipps, J.B. 2006. Studies in Crataegus series Coccineae. I. Delimitation of series. Can. J. Bot. 84: 70-86. doi:10.1139/b05-148.
50. Marquis, R.J., and Voss, E.G. 1981. Distributions of some western North American plants disjunct in the Great Lakes region. Mich. Bot. 20: 53-82.
51. McLellan, T., and Endler, J.A. 1998. The relative success of some methods for measuring and describing the shape of complex objects. Syst. Biol. 47: 264-281. doi:10.1080/106351598260914.
52. Meacham, C.A., and Duncan, T. 1991. MorphoSys. Regents of the University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
53. Muniyamma, M., and Phipps, J.B. 1979a. [Studies in Crataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae). II.] Meiosis and polyploidy in Ontario species of Crataegus in relation to their systematics. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 21: 231-241.
54. Muniyamma, M., and Phipps, J.B. 1979b. [Studies in Crataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae). I.] Cytological proof of apomixis in Crataegus (Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 66: 149-155. doi:10.2307/2442517.
55. Muniyamma, M., and Phipps, J.B. 1984. Studies in Crataegus: XI. Further cytological evidence for the occurrence of apomixis in North American hawthorns. Can. J. Bot. 62: 2316-2324. doi:10.1139/b84-315.
56. Muniyamma, M., and Phipps, J.B. 1985. Studies in Crataegus. XII. Cytological evidence for sexuality in some diploid and tetraploid species of North American hawthorns. Can. J. Bot. 63: 1319-1324.
57. Palmer, E.J. 1925. Synopsis of North American Crataegi. J. Arnold Arbor. Harv. Univ. 6: 5-128.
58. Palmer, E.J. 1963. Crataegus L. In Illustrated Flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Edited by H.A. Gleason, New York, N.Y. pp. 338-375.
59. Phipps, J.B. 1997. Monograph of northern Mexican Crataegus (Rosaceae, subfam. Maloideae). Sida, Botanical Miscellany (BRIT, Tex.), 15: 1-94.
60. Phipps, J.B. 1998a. Synopsis of Crataegus series Apiifoliae, Cordatae, Microcarpae, and Brevispinae (Rosaceae subfam. Maloideae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 85: 475-491. doi:10.2307/2992044.
61. Phipps, J.B. 1998b. Introduction to the red-fruited hawthorns (Crataegus, Rosaceae) of western North America. Can. J. Bot. 76: 1863-1899. doi:10.1139/cjb-76-11-1863.
62. Phipps, J.B. 1999. The relationships of the American black-fruited hawthorns Crataegus erythropoda, C. rivularis, C. saligna, and C. brachyacantha to C. Ser. Douglasianae (Rosaceae). Sida, Contributions to Botany, 18: 647-660.
63. Phipps, J.B. 2005. A review of hybridization in North American hawthorns. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 92: 113-126.
64. Phipps, J.B., and Muniyamma, M. 1980. [Studies in Crataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae) III.] A taxonomic revision of Crataegus (Rosaceae) in Ontario. Can. J. Bot. 58: 1621-1699. doi:10.1139/b80-197.
65. Phipps, J.B., and O'Kennon, R.J. 1998. Three new species of Crataegus (Rosaceae) from western North America: C. okennonii, C. okanagenensis, and C. phippsii. Sida: Contributions to Botany, 18: 169-191.
66. Phipps, J.B., and O'Kennon, R.J. 2002. New taxa of Crataegus (Rosaceae) from the northern Okanagan - southwestern Shuswap diversity center. Sida: Contributions to Botany, 20: 115-144.
67. Phipps, J.B., O'Kennon, R.J., and Lance, R.W. 2003. Hawthorns and medlars. Timber Press, Portland, Ore.
68. Phipps, J.B., Robertson, K.R., Smith, P.G., and Rohrer, J.R. 1990. A checklist of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Can. J. Bot. 68: 2209-2269. doi:10.1139/b90-288.
69. Podani, J. .2001 SYN-TAX 2000. Computer programs for data analysis in ecology and systematics. Scienta Publishing, Budapest, Hungary.
70. Ptak, K. 1986. Cyto-embryological investigations on the Polish representatives of the genus Crataegus L. I. Chromosome numbers; embryology of diploid and tetraploid species. Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot. 28: 107-122.
71. Ptak, K. 1989. Cyto-embryological investigations on the Polish representatives of the genus Crataegus L. II. Embryology of triploid species. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 31: 97-112, Pl. 115.
72. Rickett, H.W. 1936. Forms of Crataegus pruinosa. Bot. Gaz. 97: 780-793. doi:10.1086/334603.
73. Rickett, H.W. 1937. Forms of Crataegus crus-galli. Bot. Gaz. 98: 609-616. doi:10.1086/334663.
74. Rohlf, F.J., and Archie, J.W. 1984. A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Syst. Zool. 33: 302-317. doi:10.2307/2413076.
75. Sargent, C.S. 1892. Crataegus. In Silva of North America. Houghton, Mifflin & Co., Boston, Mass.
76. Sargent, C.S. 1907. The black-fruited Crataegus of western North America. Bot. Gaz. 44: 64-66. doi:10.1086/329256.
77. Schneider, C.K. 1906. Illustrierte Handbuch der Laubholzkunde. Gustav Fischer, Jena, Germany.
78. Smith, P.G., and Phipps, J.B. 1988. Studies in Crataegus (Rosaceae, Maloideae), XIX. Breeding behavior in Ontario Crataegus series Rotundifoliae. Can. J. Bot. 66: 1914-1923. doi:10.1139/b88-262.
79. Soper, J.H., Garton, C.E., and Given, D.R. 1989. Flora of the north shore of Lake Superior. Syllogeus, 63: 1-61.
80. Standish, L.M. 1916. What is happening to the hawthorns? J. Hered. 7: 266-279.
81. Talent, N., and Dickinson, T.A. 2005. Polyploidy in Crataegus and Mespilus (Rosaceae, Maloideae): evolutionary inferences from flow cytometry of nuclear DNA amounts. Can. J. Bot. 83: 1268-1304. doi:10.1139/b05-088.
82. Talent, N., and Dickinson, T.A. 2007a. The potential for ploidy level increases and decreases in Crataegus (Rosaceae, Spiraeoideae, tribe Pyreae). Can. J. Bot. 85: 570-584. doi:10.1139/B07-028.
83. Talent, N., and Dickinson, T.A. 2007b. Apomixis and hybridization in Rosaceae subtribe Pyrineae Dumort.: a new tool promises new insights. In Apomixis: evolution, mechanisms and perspectives. Edited by U. Grossniklaus, E. Hörandl, T. Sharbel, and P. van Dijk. Gantner Verlag Ruggell, Liechtenstein. pp. 301-316.
84. Talent, N., and Dickinson, T.A. 2007c. Endosperm formation in aposporous Crataegus (Rosaceae, Spiraeoideae, tribe Pyreae): parallels to Ranunculaceae and Poaceae. New Phytol. 173: 231-249. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01918.x. PMID:17204072.
85. Taylor, R.L., and Mulligan, G.A. 1968. Flora of the Queen Charlotte Islands, Part 2. Cytological aspects of the vascular plants. Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ont.
86. The R Development Core Team. 2006. An introduction to R, version 2.4.1. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
87. Thompson, R.S., Anderson, K.H., and Bartlein, P.J. 1999. Atlas of relations between climatic parameters and distributions of important trees and shrubs in North America. Professional Paper, United States Geological Survey. [Online]. Available from pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1650-a/ [accessed 19 August 07].
88. Tsumura, Y., Yoshimura, K., Tomaru, N., and Ohba, K. 1995. Molecular phylogeny of conifers using RFLP analysis of PCR-amplified specific chloroplast genes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 1222-1236. doi:10.1007/BF00220933.
89. Verbylaitė, R., Ford-Lloyd, B., and Newbury, J. 2006. The phylogeny of woody Maloideae (Rosaceae) using chloroplast trnL-trnF sequence data. Biologija (Vilnius), 2006 (1): 60-63.
90. Ward, D.B. 1974. The "Ignorant Man" Technique of Sampling Plant Populations. Taxon, 23: 325-330. doi:10.2307/1218711.
91. Weber, W.A., and Wittmann, R.C. 2000. Catalog of the Colorado Flora (revised electronic version, Jan. 2000). [Online]. Available from cumuseum.colorado.edu/Research/Botany/Databases/catalog.html [accessed September 2007].
92. Wells, T.C., and Phipps, J.B. 1989. Studies in Crataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae). XX. Interserial hybridization between Crataegus monogyna (series Oxyacanthae) and Crataegus punctata (series Punctatae) in southern Ontario. Can. J. Bot. 67: 2465-2472. doi:10.1139/b89-316.
93. Zika, P.F. 2004. A noteworthy collection - Crataegus castlegarensis J.B. Phipps & O'Kennon (Rosaceae). Madroño, 51: 395.