Quantitative morphology of the Amelanchier agamic complex (Rosaceae) at a Maine site

Systematic Botany

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 31-41

  Dibble, Alison C ^a,c   Wright, Wesley A ^a   Campbell, Christopher S ^a   Greene, Craig W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

^b Policy and Design   (United States)

^c U States Dept Agric Forest Serv   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYBRIDIZATION; QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

AMELANCHIER CANADENSIS; AMELANCHIER INTERMEDIA; AMELANCHIER LAEVIS; AMELANCHIER NANTUCKETENSIS; AMELANCHIER RUBRA; AMELANCHIER STOLONIFERA;

EID: 0031957852     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2419572     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. AAS, G., J. MAIER, M. BALTISBERGER, and S. METZGER. 1994. Morphology, isozyme variation, cytology, and reproduction of hybrids between Sorbus aria (L.) Crantz and S. torminalis (L.) Crantz. Botanica Helvetica 104: 195-214.
2. ASKER, S. E. and L. JERLING. 1992. Apomixis in plants. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
3. BAYER, R. J. 1987. Evolution and phylogenetic relationships of the Antennaria (Asteraceae: Inuleae) polyploid agamic complexes. Biologisches Zentralblatt 106: 683-698.
4. BURTI, B. L. 1970. lnfraspecific categories in flowering plants. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 2: 233-238.
5. CAMPBELL, C. S. and W. A. WRIGHT. 1996. Apomixis, hybridization, and taxonomic complexity in the Amelanchier (Rosaceae) agamic complex. Folia Geobotanica and Phytotaxonomica 31: 345-354.
6. _, C. W. GREENE, and S. E. BERGQUIST. 1987. Apomixis and sexuality in three species of Amelanchier, shadbush (Rosaceae, Maloideae). American Journal of Botany 74: 321-328.
7. _, _, and T. A. DICKINSON. 1991. Reproductive biology in subfam. Maloideae (Rosaceae). Systematic Botany 16: 333-349.
8. _, _, B. F. NEUBAUER, and J. M. HIGGINS. 1985. Apomixis in Amelanchier laevis, Shadbush (Rosaceae, Maloideae). American Journal of Botany 72: 1397-1403.
9. _, M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, B. G. BALDWIN, L. A. ALICE, and M. J. DONOGHUE. 1997a. Persistent nuclear ribosomal DNA sequence polymorphism in the Amelanchier agamic complex (Rosaceae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 81-90.
10. _, W. A. WRIGHT, T. F. VINING, and W. A. HALTEMAN. 1997b. Morphological variation in sexual and agamospermous Amelanchier. Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 1166-1173.
11. CLNQ-MARS, L. 1971. Le genre Amelanchier au Québec. Le Naturaliste Canadien 98: 329-346.
12. CRUISE, J. F. 1964. Studies of natural hybridization in Amelanchier. Canadian Journal of Botany 42: 651-663.
13. DIBBLE, A. C. 1995. Conservation biology of shadbush, Amelanchier (Rosaceae): evidence from systematics, population structure and reproductive ecology. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Maine, Orono.
14. _ and C. S. CAMPBELL. 1995. Distribution and conservation of Nantucket shadbush, Amelanchier nantucketensis (Rosaceae). Rhodora 97: 339-349.
15. _ and F. A. DRUMMOND. 1997. Floral syndrome in Amelanchier nantucketensis (Rosaceae) II. Bee preference and diversity associated with andropetaly. Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 1851-1859.
16. _,_, and W. E. LABERGE. 1997. Floral syndrome in Amelanchier nantucketensis (Rosaceae) I. Floral density, bee activity, and characterization of andropetaly. Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 1860-1867.
17. DICKINSON, T. A. and J. B. PHIPPS. 1985. Studies in Crataegus L. (Rosaceae: Maloideae). XIII. Degree and pattern of phenotypic variation in Crataegus sect. Crus-galli in Ontario. Systematic Botany 10: 322-337.
18. FERNALD, M. L. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. 8th edition. New York: American Book Co.
19. FLURY, B. and H. RIEDWYL. 1988. Multivariate statistics: A practical approach. London: Chapman and Hall.
20. GALBRAITH, D. W. 1990. Flow cytometric analysis of plant genomes. Methods in Cell Biology 33: 549-562.
21. GRANT, V. 1981. Plant speciation. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
22. GUSTAFSSON, A. 1946-1947. Apomixis in higher plants. Lunds Universitets Årsskrift 42-43: 1-370.
23. JOLIFFE, I. T. 1986. Principle component analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
24. JONES, G. N. 1946. American species of Amelanchier. Illinois Biological Monographs 20(2).
25. KIRSCHNER, J. and J. STEPÁNEK. 1996. Modes of speciation and evolution of the sections in Taraxacum. Folia Geobotanica and Phytotaxonomica 31: 415-426.
26. LANDRY, P. 1975. Le concept d'espèce et la taxinomie du genre Amelanchier (Rosacées). Bulletin Société Botanique de France 122: 243-252.
27. LEGENDRE, L. and P. LEGENDRE. 1983. Numerical ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co.
28. LOHMANN, G. P. and P. N. SCHWEITZER. 1990. On eigenshape analysis. Pp. 147-166 in Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop, eds. F. J. Rohlf and F. L. Bookstein. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology.
29. McDADE, L. A. 1995. Hybridization and phylogenetics. Pp. 305-331 in Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics, Monographs in Systematic Botany, Volume 53, eds. P. C. Hoch and A. G. Stephenson. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden.
30. MEACHAM, C. A. and T. DUNCAN. 1990. MorphoSys reference manual. Version 1.29. Berkeley: Univ. of California.
31. NIELSEN, E. L. 1939. A taxonomic study of the genus Amelanchier in Minnesota. American Midland Naturalist 22: 160-206.
32. OVERATH, R. D. and J. L. HAMRICK. (in press). Allozyme diversity in Amelanchier laevis and A. arborea. Rhodora.
33. PHIPPS, J. B. and M. MUNIYAMMA. 1980. A taxonomic revision of Crataegus (Rosaceae) in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Botany 58: 1621-1699.
34. RICHARDS, A. J. 1986. Plant breeding systems. London: George Allen and Unwin.
35. RIESEBERG, L. H. 1995. The role of hybridization in evolution: Old wine in new skins. American Journal of Botany 82: 944-953.
36. _ and J. F. WENDEL. 1993. Introgression and its consequences in plants. Pp. 70-114 in Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process, ed. R. G. Harrison. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
37. ROBINSON, W. A. 1982. Experimental taxonomy in the genus Amelanchier. II: Do the taxa in the genus Amelanchier form an agamic complex? Rhodora 84: 85-100.
38. ROHLF, F. J. 1993. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 1.8. Setauket, New York: Exeter Software.
39. _ and L. F. MARCUS. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8: 129-132.
40. SAS INSTITUTE, INC. 1990. Statistical analysis system. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute, Inc.
41. STEBBINS, G. L. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
42. TABACHNIK, B. G. and L. S. FIDELL. 1996. Using multivariate statistics. 3rd edition. New York: Harper Collins.
43. WEBER, H. E. 1996. Former and modern taxonomic treatment of the apomictic Rubus complex. Folia Geobotanica and Phytotaxonomica 31: 373-380.
44. WEBER, J. E. and C. S. CAMPBELL. 1989. Breeding system of a hybrid between a sexual and an apomictic species of Amelanchier, Shadbush (Rosaceae, Maloideae). American Journal of Botany 76: 341-347.
45. WIEGAND, K. M. 1912. The genus Amelanchier in Eastern North America. Rhodora 14: 117-161.
46. WILSON, P. 1992. On inferring hybridity from morphological intermediacy. Taxon 41: 11-23.