US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: Results of a validation study in 1352 cases

Radiology

Volumn 248, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 406-413

  Schueller, Gerd ^a   Jaromi, Sylvia ^a   Ponhold, Lothar ^a   Fuchsjaeger, Michael ^a   Memarsadeghi, Mazda ^a   Rudas, Margaretha ^a   Weber, Michael ^a   Liberman, Laura ^b   Helbich, Thomas H ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST LESION; CORE NEEDLE BREAST BIOPSY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE COURSE; ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EXCISION; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VALIDATION STUDY; BREAST TUMOR; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 49049114113     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482071994     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990;176:741-747.
2. Ballo MS, Sneige N. Can core needle biopsy replace fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of palpable breast carcinoma: a comparative study of 124 women. Cancer 1996;78:773-777.
3. Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, O'Doherty A, McDermott EW, O'Higgins N. The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases. Ann Surg 2005;242:701-707.
4. Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT. Non-palpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 1993;188:453-455.
5. Helbich TH, Mayr W, Schick S, et al. Coaxial technique: approach to breast core biopsies. Radiology 1997;203:684-690.
6. Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I, et al. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients: a multicenter study. Cancer 2004;100:245-251.
7. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193:359-364.
8. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991;180:403-407.
9. Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Riedl CC, et al. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1503-1507.
10. Pijnappel RM, van den Donk M, Holland R, et al. Diagnostic accuracy for different strategies of image-guided breast intervention in cases of nonpalpable breast lesions. Br J Cancer 2004;90:595-600.
11. Sauer G, Deissler H, Strunz K, et al. Ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsies of breast lesions: analysis of 962 cases to determine the number of samples for reliable tumour classification. Br J Cancer 2005;92:231-235.
12. Simon JR, Kalbhen CL, Cooper RA, Flisak ME. Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: initial results. Radiology 2000;215:694-697.
13. Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, Meyer JE, et al. The utility of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:43-49.
14. Crystal P, Koretz M, Shcharynsky S, Makarov V, Strano S. Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least 2-year follow-up of benign lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 2005;33:47-52.
15. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF. US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 1998;208:717-723.
16. Mainiero MB, Gareen IF, Bird CE, Smith W, Cobb C, Schepps B. Preferential use of sonographically guided biopsy to minimize patient discomfort and procedure time in a percutaneous image-guided breast biopsy program. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:1221-1226.
17. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993;187:507-511.
18. Liberman L, Fahs MC, Dershaw DD, et al. Impact of stereotaxic core breast biopsy on cost of diagnosis. Radiology 1995;195:633-637.
19. Gruber R, Bernt R, Helbich TH. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous core needle breast biopsy (CNBB) versus open surgical biopsy (OSB) of nonpalpable breast lesions: meta-analysis and cost evaluation for German-speaking countries [in German]. Rofo 2008;180:134-142.
20. Shah VI, Raju U, Chitale D, Deshpande V, Gregory N, Strand V. False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 consecutive cases of missed breast cancer. Cancer 2003;97:1824-1831.
21. Helbich TH, Buchberger W, Rudas M. Stereotactically and sonographically guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a national consensus for Austria [in German]. Rofo 2002;174:517-522.
22. Helbich TH, Matzek W, Fuchsjager MH. Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 2004;14:383-393.
23. Wallis M, Tardivon A, Helbich T, Schreer I. Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures. Eur Radiol 2007;17:581-588.
24. American College of Radiology. Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
25. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:1111-1113.
26. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123-134.
27. Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA, et al. Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 2000;89:2538-2546.
28. Liberman L. Centennial dissertation: percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy - state of the art at the millennium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1191-1199.
29. Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Buskens E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2000;82:1017-1021.
30. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA Jr. Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 1997;204:677-684.
31. Schoonjans JM, Brem RF. Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20:967-972.
32. Buchberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P, Rettl G, Dunser M. Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of the breast: technique, accuracy and indications [in German]. Radiologe 2002;42:25-32.
33. Memarsadeghi M, Pfarl G, Riedl C, Wagner T, Rudas M, Helbich TH. Value of 14-gauge ultrasound-guided large-core needle biopsy of breast lesions: own results in comparison with the literature [in German]. Rofo 2003;175:374-380.
34. Schulz-Wendtland R, Kramer S, Lang N, Bautz W. Ultrasonic guided microbiopsy in mammary diagnosis: indications, technique and results. Anticancer Res 1998;18:2145-2146.
35. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-needle core biopsy: nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy. Radiology 1998;206:717-720.
36. Youk JH, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Lee JY, Oh KK. Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them. Radio-Graphics 2007;27:79-94.
37. Fishman JE, Milikowski C, Ramsinghani R, Velasquez MV, Aviram G. US-guided core-needle biopsy of the breast: how many specimens are necessary? Radiology 2003;226:779-782.
38. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Lester SC, et al. Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. JAMA 1999;281:1638-1641.
39. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001;218:497-502.
40. Hines JR, Murad TM, Beal JM. Prognostic indicators in cystosarcoma phylloides. Am J Surg 1987;153:276-280.
41. Valdes EK, Tartter PI, Genelus-Dominique E, Guilbaud DA, Rosenbaum-Smith S, Estabrook A. Significance of papillary lesions at percutaneous breast biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:480-482.
42. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shepard MJ, Finkelstein SI, Marzoni FA Jr. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994;193:91-95.
43. Lee CH, Egglin TK, Philpotts L, Mainiero MB, Tocino I. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings. Radiology 1997;202:849-854.
44. Adepoju LJ, Symmans WF, Babiera GV, et al. Impact of concurrent proliferative high-risk lesions on the risk of ipsilateral breast carcinoma recurrence and contralateral breast carcinoma development in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving therapy. Cancer 2006;106:42-50.
45. Vogel VG. Recent results from clinical trials using SERMs to reduce the risk of breast cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006;1089:127-142.
46. Badoual C, Maruani A, Ghorra C, Lebas P, Avigdor S, Michenet P. Pathological prognostic factors of invasive breast carcinoma in ultrasound-guided large core biopsies-correlation with subsequent surgical excisions. Breast 2005;14:22-27.
47. Bolivar AV, Alonso-Bartolome P, Garcia EO, Ayensa FG. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: a prospective analysis in 204 cases. Acta Radiol 2005;46:690-695.
48. Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ, et al. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. Acad Radiol 2004;11:293-308.