US-guided core breast biopsy: Use and cost-effectiveness

Radiology

Volumn 208, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 717-723

  Liberman, Laura ^a   Feng, Timothy L ^a   Dershaw, D David ^a   Morris, Elizabeth A ^a   Abramson, Andrea F ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsies, technology; Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast, biopsy; Stereotaxis; Ultrasound (US), guidance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

EID: 0031752117     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.208.3.9722851     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990; 176:741-747.
2. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991; 180:403-407.
3. Dowlatshahi K, Yaremko ML, Kluskens LF, Jokich PM. Nonpalpable breast lesions: findings of stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1991; 181:745-750.
4. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al. US-guided automated large-core biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187:507-511.
5. Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 1993; 188:453-455.
6. Jackman RJ, Nowel KW, Shepard MJ, Finkelstein SI, Marzoni FA. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994; 193:91-95.
7. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994; 193:359-364.
8. Rubin E, Dempsey PJ, Pile NS, et al. Needle-localization biopsy of the breast: impact of a selective core needle biopsy program on yield. Radiology 1995; 195:627-631.
9. Liberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Hann LE, Rosen PP. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions: an indication for surgical biopsy. AJR 1995; 164:1111-1113.
10. Liberman L, Fahs MC, Dershaw DD, et al. Impact of stereotaxic core breast biopsy on cost of diagnosis. Radiology 1995; 195:633-637.
11. Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Liberman L, Abramson AF. Nondiagnostic stereotaxic core breast biopsy: results of rebiopsy. Radiology 1996; 198:323-325.
12. Brenner RJ, Fajardo L, Fisher PR, et al. Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. AJR 1996; 166:341-346.
13. Liberman L, LaTrenta LR, Dershaw DD, et al. Impact of core biopsy on the surgical management of impalpable breast cancer. AJR 1997; 168:495-499.
14. Kaye MD, Vicinanza-Adami CA, Sullivan ML. Mammographic findings after stereotaxic biopsy of the breast performed with large-core needles. Radiology 1994; 192: 149-151.
15. Lindfors KK, Rosenquist CJ. Needle core biopsy guided with mammography: a study of cost effectiveness. Radiology 1994; 190:217-222.
16. Lee CH, Egglin TK, Philpotts L, Mainiero MB, Tocino I. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings. Radiology 1997; 202:849-854.
17. Fajardo LL. Cost-effectiveness of stereotaxic breast core needle biopsy. Acad Radiol 1996; 3:521-523.
18. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Glassman JR, et al. Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. Radiology 1997; 203:151-157.
19. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, et al. Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 1994; 192:793-795.
20. Liberman L, Bonaccio E, Hamele-Bena D, Abramson AF, Cohen MA, Dershaw DD. Benign and malignant phyllodes tumors: mammographic and sonographic findings. Radiology 1996; 198:121-124.
21. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with a directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy instrument. Radiology 1997; 202:843-847.
22. Jackman RJ, Finkelstein SI, Marzoni FA. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of histologically benign nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative results and failed follow-up (abstr). Radiology 1995; 197(P):203.
23. The American College of Radiology. 19101 approved for stereotactic breast biopsy, effective immediately. In: ACR Bulletin (newsletter). Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, October 1997; 53:5.
24. Hillner BE, Bear HD, Fajardo LL. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of stereotaxic biopsy for nonpalpable breast abnormalities: a decision analysis model. Acad Radiol 1996; 3:351-360.
25. Fajardo LL. Cost-effectiveness of stereotaxic core needle biopsy. Acad Radiol 1996; 3:S21-S23.
26. Nields MW. Cost-effectiveness of image-guided core needle biopsy versus surgery in diagnosing breast cancer. Acad Radiol 1996; (suppl 1)3:138-140.
27. Burbank F. Mammographic findings after 14-gauge automated needle and 14-gauge directional, vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsies. Radiology 1997; 204:153-156.
28. Kopans DB. Caution on core (devil's advocate). Radiology 1994; 193:325-328.
29. Goodman KA, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Compliance with recommended follow-up after percutaneous breast core biopsy. AJR 1998; 170:89-92.
30. Berlin L. Tracking for breast cancer. AJR 1998; 170:93-95.
31. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome. Am Surg 1996; 62:738-744.
32. Liberman L, Hann LE, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Rosen PP. Mammographic findings after stereotactic 14-gauge vacuum biopsy. Radiology 1997; 203:343-347.
33. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997; 204:485-488.
34. Meyer JE, Smith DN, Dipiro PJ, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy of clustered microcalcifications with a directional, vacuum-assisted device. Radiology 1997; 204:575-576.
35. Berg WA, Krebs TL, Campassi C, Magder LS, Sun CCJ. Evaluation of 14- and 11-gauge directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy probes and 14-gauge biopsy guns in a breast parenchymal model. Radiology 1997; 205:203-208.
36. Burbank F. Mammotomy: post-biopsy mammogram findings and CPT coding. Adm Radiol 1997; 16:14-19.
37. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of 14- and 11-gauge Mammotome probe performance and complication rates. Am Surg 1997; 11:988-995.
38. Burbank F, Forcier N. Tissue marking clip for stereotactic breast biopsy: initial placement accuracy, long-term stability, and usefulness as a guide for wire localization. Radiology 1997; 205:407-415.
39. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, et al. Clip placement after stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 1997; 205:417-422.
40. Bird RE. A prospective and retrospective evaluation of the potential usefulness of the 2 cm core ABBI technology in breast biopsy. Presented at the Third Postgraduate Course of the Society of Breast Imaging, San Diego, Calif, April 16-19, 1997.
41. Ferzli GS, Hurwitz JB, Puza T, Vorst-Bilotti SV. Advanced breast biopsy instrumentation: a critique. J Am Coll Surg 1997; 185:145-151.
42. D'Angelo PC, Galliano DE, Rosemurgy AS. Stereotactic excisional breast biopsies utilizing the advanced breast biopsy instrumentation system. Am J Surg 1997; 174:297-302.
43. Mandis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1998. CA Cancer J Clin 1998; 48:6-29.
44. Osteen RT, Cady B, Chmiel JS, et al. 1991 National Survey of Carcinoma of the Breast by the Commission on Cancer. J Am Coll Surg 1994; 178:213-219.
45. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA. Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 1997; 204:677-684.