Coaxial technique: Approach to breast core biopsies

Radiology

Volumn 203, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 684-690

  Helbich, Thomas H ^a,b   Mayr, Winfried ^a   Schick, Susanne ^a   Youssefzadeh, Sorya ^a   Rudas, Margarete ^a   Taucher, Susanne ^a   Wagner, Teresa ^a   Kelkar, Pramod ^a   Wolf, Georg ^a   Thurnher, Majda ^a   Mostbeck, Gerhard H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsies, technology; Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Breast, biopsy; Stereotaxis; Ultrasound (US), guidance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

EID: 0030997463     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169689     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, et al. Sterotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990; 176:741-747.
2. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991; 180: 403-407.
3. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993; 187:507-511.
4. Gisvold JJ, Goellner JR, Grant CS, et al. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. AJR 1994; 162:815-820.
5. Meyer JE, Christian RL, Lester SC, et al. Evaluation of nonpalpable solid breast masses with stereotactic large-core biopsy using a dedicated unit. AJR 1996; 167:179-182.
6. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ, et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994; 193:359-364.
7. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Abramson AF, Deutch BM, Hann LE. Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 1994; 192:793-796.
8. Kaplan SS, Racenstein MJ, Wong WS, Hansen GC, McCombs MM, Bassett LW. US-guided core biopsy of the breast with a coaxial system. Radiology 1995; 194:573-575.
9. Caines JS, McPhee MD, Konok SG, Wright BA. Stereotaxic needle core biopsy of breast lesions using a regular mammographic table with an adaptable stereotaxic device. AJR 1994; 163:317-321.
10. Dronkers DD. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast lesions. Radiology 1992; 183:631-634.
11. Dowlatshahi K, Yaremko ML, Kluskens LF, Jokich PM. Nonpalpable breast lesions: findings of stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1991; 181:745-750.
12. Hopper KD, Grenko RT, TenHave TR, Hartzel J, Sturtz KW, Savage CA. Percutaneous biopsy of the liver and kidney by using coaxial technique: adequacy of the specimen obtained with three different needles in vitro. AJR 1995; 164:221-224.
13. Frederick PR, Miller MH, Bahr AL, Longson FW. Coaxial needles for repeated biopsy sampling. Radiology 1989; 170:273-274.
14. Moulton JS, Moore PT. Coaxial percutaneous biopsy technique with automated biopsy devices: value in improving accuracy and negative predictive value. Radiology 1993; 186:515-522.
15. Wittich GR, Nowels KW, Korn RL, et al. Coaxial transthoracic fine-needle biopsy in patients with a history of malignant lymphoma. Radiology 1992; 183:175-178.
16. Savage CA, Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, Hartzel JS, TenHave TR. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy versus fine-needle capillary (nonaspiration) biopsy: in vivo comparison. Radiology 1995; 195:815-819.
17. Hopper KD, Abendroth CS, TenHave TR, Hartzel JS, Sturtz KW, Savage CA. Three coaxial fine-needle biopsy techniques for fine-needle biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1995; 18:307-311.
18. Silver B, Metzger TS, Matalon TAS. A simple phantom for learning needle placement for sonographically guided biopsy. AJR 1990; 154:847-848.
19. Liberman L, Evans WP III, Dershaw DD, et al. Radiography of microcalcifications in stereotaxic mammary core biopsy specimens. Radiology 1994; 190:223-225.
20. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London, England: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
21. Berg WA. When is core breast biopsy or fine-needle aspiration not enough? Radiology 1996; 198:313-315.
22. Parker SH, Burbank F. A practical approach to minimally invasive breast biopsy. Radiology 1996; 200:11-20.
23. Parker SH. Needle selection. In: Parker SH, Jobe WE, eds. Percutaneous breast biopsy. New York, NY: Raven, 1993; 8.
24. Krebs TL, Berg WA, Severson MJ, et al. Large-core biopsy guns: comparison for yield of breast tissue. Radiology 1996; 200: 365-368.
25. Helvie MA, Ikeda DM, Adler DD. Localization and needle aspiration of breast lesions: complications in 370 cases. AJR 1991; 157:711-714.
26. Harter LP, Curtis JS, Ponto G, Craig PH. Malignant seeding of the needle track during stereotaxic core needle breast biopsy. Radiology 1992; 185:713-714.
27. Ciatto S, Catarzi S, Morrone D, Rosseli Del Turco M. Fine needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions: US versus stereotaxic guidance. Radiology 1993; 188: 195-198.
28. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL, Chan NHL. Solid breast lesions: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 1993; 189:573-580.
29. Jakobeit C. US-controlled puncture procedures: free-hand puncture versus transducer biopsy puncture - 5 years experience. Ultraschall in der Medizin 1986; 7:290-292. [German]
30. Mostbeck GH, Wittich GR, Derfler K, et al. Optimal needle size for renal biopsy: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Radiology 1989; 173:819-822.
31. Memel DS, Dodd GD, Esola CC. Efficacy of sonography as a guidance technique for biopsy of abdominal, pelvic, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. AJR 1996; 167:957-962.