A comparison of multifocal and conventional visual evoked potential techniques in patients with optic neuritis/multiple sclerosis

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 117, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 121-128

  Grover, Larissa K ^a   Hood, Donald C ^a   Ghadiali, Quraish ^a   Grippo, Tomas M ^b   Wenick, Adam S ^a   Greenstein, Vivienne C ^a   Behrens, Myles M ^a   Odel, Jeffrey G ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

Author keywords

Multifocal visual evoked potential; Multiple sclerosis; Optic neuritis; VEP

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROOPHTHALMOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTIC NEURITIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OPTIC NEURITIS; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 49049089352     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-007-9112-7     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Swanson JW (1989) Multiple sclerosis: Update in diagnosis and review of prognostic factors. Mayo Clin Proc 64:577-586
2. Halliday AM, McDonald EI, Mushin J (1972) Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Lancet 1:661-664
3. Yang EB, Hood DC, Rodarte C, Zhang X, Odel JG, Behrens MM (2007) Improvement in conduction velocity after optic neuritis measured with the multifocal VEP. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:692-698
4. Optic Neuritis Study Group (1991) The clinical profile of optic neuritis. Experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Arch Ophthalmol 109:1673-1678
5. Halliday AM, McDonald EI, Mushin J (1973) Visual evoked response in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. BMJ 1:661-664
6. Hood DC, Odel JG, Winn BJ (2003) The multifocal visual evoked potential. J Neuro-Ophthalmol 23:279-289
7. Hood DC, Odel JG, Zhang X (2000) Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: A multifocal VEP study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:4032-4038
8. Hood DC, Ohri N, Yang EB, Rodarte C, Zhang X, Fortune B, Johnson CA (2004) Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: A monocular analysis. Doc Ophthalmol 109:189-199
9. Hood DC, Zhang X, Rodarte C, Yang EB, Ohri N, Fortune B, Johnson CA (2004) Determining abnormal interocular latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 109:177-187
10. Fortune B, Hood DC (2003) Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1364-1375
11. Fortune B, Goh K, Demirel S, Novitsky K, Mansberger SL, Johnson CA, Cioffi GA (2003) Detection of glaucomatous visual field loss using the multifocal visual evoked potential. In: Henson DB, Wall M (eds) Perimetry update 2002/2003; Proceedings of the XVth international perimetric society meeting. Kugler, The Hague, pp 251-260
12. Hood DC, Greenstein VC (2003) Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 22:201-251
13. Hood DC, Odel JG, Winn BJ (2003) The multifocal visual evoked potential. J Neuro-Ophthalmol 23:279-289
14. James AC (2003) The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:879-890
15. James AC, Ruseckaite R, Maddess T (2005) Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials. Vis Neurosci 22:45-54
16. Ruseckaite R, Maddess T, Danta G, Lueck CJ, James AC (2005) Sparse multifocal stimuli for the detection of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 57:904-913
17. Odom JV, Bach M, Barber C et al (2004) Visual evoked potentials standard. Doc Ophthalmol 108:115-123
18. Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T (1998) The topographic visual evoked potential: Improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:937-950
19. Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, Kangovi S, Odel JG, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2000) An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: A possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1580-1587
20. Hood DC, Zhang X, Hong JE, Chen CS (2002) Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Doc Ophthalmol 104:303-320
21. Hood DC (2004) Electrophysiologic imaging of retinal and optic nerve damage: The multifocal technique. Ophthalmol Clin N Am 1:69-88
22. Grippo TM, Hood DC, Kanadani FN, Ezon I, Greenstein VC, Liebmann JM, Ritch R (2006) A comparison between multifocal and conventional VEP latency changes secondary to glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:5331-5336