Predicting phenotypic effects of gene perturbations in C. elegans using an integrated network model

BioEssays

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 707-710

  Borgwardt, Karsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED RNA;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MODEL; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; MACHINE LEARNING; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; RNA INTERFERENCE; SCORING SYSTEM; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHENOTYPE; RNA INTERFERENCE; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS;

EID: 48949097123     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.20783     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Lee I, Lehner B, Crombie C, Wong W, Fraser AG, Marcotte EM. 2008. A single gene network accurately predicts phenotypic effects of gene perturbation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature Genetics 40:181-188.
2. Levy S, Sutton G, Ng PC, Feuk L, Halpern AL, et al. 2007. The Diploid Genome Sequence of an Individual Human. PLoS Biology 5:e254 EP.
3. Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A, Lomaz J, Ashburner M, et al. 2004. The gene ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D258-D261.
4. Gunsalus KC, Ge H, Schetter AJ, Goldberg DS, Han JD, et al. 2005. Predictive models of molecular machines involved in Caenorhabditis elegans early embryogenesis. Nature 436:861-865.
5. Li S, Armstrong CM, Bertin N, Ge H, Milstein S, Boxem M, et al. 2004. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 303:540-543.
6. Stuart JM, Segal E, Koller D, Kim SK. 2003. A Gene-Coexpression Network for Global Discovery of Conserved Genetic Modules. Science 302:249-255.
7. Zhong W, Sternberg PW. 2006. Genome-Wide Prediction of C. elegans Genetic Interactions. Science 311:1481-1484.
8. Lee I, Date SV, Adai AT, Marcotte EM. 2004. A probabilistic functional network of yeast genes. Science (New York, N.Y.) 306:1555-1558.
9. McGary KL, Lee I, Marcotte EM. 2007. Broad network-based predictability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene loss-of-function phenotypes. Genome Biology 8:R258.
10. Lee I, Li Z, Marcotte EM. 2007. An improved, bias-reduced probabilistic functional gene network of Baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 2:e988.
11. Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabsi AL, Oltvai ZN. 2001. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411:41-42.
12. Gandhi TKB, Zhong J, Mathivanan S, Karthick L, Chandrika KN, et al. 2006. Analysis of the human protein interactome and comparison with yeast, worm and fly interaction datasets. Nat Genet 38: 285-293.
13. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC. 1998. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391:806-811.