Levels of interaction and proximity: Content analysis of video-based classroom cases

Internet and Higher Education

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 119-128

  Kale, Ugur ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom interaction; Content analysis; Digital videos; Field experience; Physical proximity; Teacher education

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

CLASSROOM INTERACTION; CONTENT ANALYSIS; DIGITAL VIDEOS; FIELD EXPERIENCE; FUTURE RESEARCH; LEARNER-CENTERED; ONLINE VIDEO; PHYSICAL PROXIMITY; TEACHER EDUCATION;

FLOW INTERACTIONS;

EID: 48849088133     PISSN: 10967516     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Allsopp D.H., Demarie D., Alvarez-Mchatton P., and Doone E. Bridging the gap between theory and practice: Connecting courses with field experiences. Teacher Education Quarterly Teacher Education Quarterly 33 1 (2006) 19-35
2. Anguiano P. A First-year teacher's plan to reduce misbehavior in the classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children 33 3 (2001) 52
3. Bauer M. Classical content analysis: A review. In: Bauer M., and Gaskell G. (Eds). Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound (2000), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 131-151
4. Bonk C.J., and Cunningham D.J. Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In: Bonk C.J., and King K.S. (Eds). Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, US 25-50
5. Brush T., and Saye J. Evaluation of the persistent issues in history laboratory for virtual field experience (PIH-LVFE). Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Instructional Technology Special Interest Group, Chicago, IL (2007, April)
6. Chaney-Cullen T., and Duffy T. Strategic teaching frameworks: Multimedia to support teacher change. Journal of the Learning Sciences 8 (1998) 1-40
7. Chin C. Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students' responses. International Journal of Science Education 28 11 (2006) 1315-1346
8. Driscoll M.P. Psychology of learning for instruction (2000), Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, Massachusetts A Pearson Education Company
9. Duffy T.M., Dueber B., and Hawley C.L. Critical thinking in a distributed environment: A pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems. In: Bonk C.J., and King K.S. (Eds). Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, US 51-78
10. Egbert J., and Thomas M. The new frontier: A case study in applying instructional design for distance teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 9 3 (2001) 391
11. Herring S.C. Content analysis for new media: Rethinking the paradigm. New Research for New Media: Innovative Research Methodologies Symposium Working Papers and Readings (2004), University of Minnesota School of Journalism and Mass Communication, Minneapolis, MN 47-66
12. Hewitt J., Pedretti E., Bencze L., Vaillancourt B.D., and Yoon S. New applications for multimedia cases: Promoting reflective practice in preservice teacher education. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education Journal of Technology & Teacher Education 11 4 (2003) 483-500
13. Inquiry Learning Forum. (2006). Retrieved October, 7, 2006, from http://ilf.crlt.indiana.edu/
14. King K.P. Identifying success in online teacher education and professional development. The Internet & Higher Education 5 3 (2002) 231
15. Kroll L., et al. The effect of a school-university partnership on the student teaching experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA (1990, April)
16. Lampert M., and Ball D. Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics (1998), Teachers College, Columbia University, New York
17. Ledoux M., and McHenry N. A constructivist approach in the interdisciplinary instruction of science and language arts methods. Teaching Education 15 4 (2004) 385-399
18. McCurry D.S. Multimedia case-based support of experiential teacher education: Critical self reflection and dialogue in multi-cultural contexts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA (2002, April)
19. McDevitt M.A. A virtual view: Classroom observations at a distance. Journal of Teacher Education 47 3 (1996) 191-195
20. Mehrabain A. Some referants and measures of non-verbal behaviour. Behavioural Research Methods and Instrumentation 1 (1969) 213-217
21. Miller P.W. Nonverbal Communication. What Research Says to the Teacher (1981), National Education Association, Washington, DC
22. Miller P. Nonverbal communication. 3rd ed (1988), National Education Association, Washington, D.C.
23. Miller P.W. Body language in the classroom. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers 80 8 (2005) 28-30
24. Mottet T.P., Richmond V.P., and McCroskey J.C. The Handbook of Instructional Communication: Rhetorical and Relational Perspectives (2006), Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA
25. Oberman P.S. Academic help seeking and peer Interactions of high school girls in computer science classes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 44 3405) Retrieved November 5, 2006 (2000). http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED443405 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED443405
26. Pape S.L., and McIntyre D.J. Student reactions to using video cases for evaluation of early field experiences. Paper presented at the Summer Workshop of the Association of Teacher Educators, Pittsburg, PA (1993)
27. Persistent Issues in History Network. (2006). Retrieved October 7, 2006, from www.pihnet.org
28. Phillion J., Chamness Miller P., and Lehman J.D. Providing field experiences with diverse populations for preservice teachers: Using technology to bridge distances and cultures. Multicultural Perspectives 7 3 (2005) 3-9
29. Philpott, J. (1983). The relative contribution of meaning of verbal and non-verbal channels of communication: A meta-analysis. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
30. Reigeluth C.M., and Moore J. Cognitive education and cognitive domain. In: Reigeluth C.M. (Ed). Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 51-68
31. Santagata R., Zannoni C., and Stigler J.W. The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 10 2 (2007) 123-140
32. Schrader P., Leu Jr. D., Kinzer C., Ataya R., Teale W., Labbo L., et al. Using Internet delivered video cases to support pre-service teachers' understanding of effective early literacy instruction: An exploratory study. Instructional Science 31 (2003) 317-340
33. Sills-Briegel T.M. Teacher-student proximity and interactions in a computer laboratory and classroom. Clearing House 70 1 (1996) 21-23
34. Simpson M. Field experience in distance delivered initial teacher education programs. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education 14 2 (2006) 241-254
35. Stirling D., Williams M., and Padgett H. Investigating the effectiveness of video case use in teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Atlanta, GA (2004, March)
36. Teale W., Leu Jr. D., Labbo L., and Kinzer C. Exploring literacy on the internet. The Reading Teacher 55 7 (2002) 654-659
37. Watzke J.L. Longitudinal study of stages of beginning teacher development in a field-based teacher education program. The Teacher Educator 38 3 (2003) 209-229
38. Willard-Holt C. The impact of a short-term international experience for preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education 17 4 (2001) 505-517