The use of online digital resources and educational digital libraries in higher education

International Journal on Digital Libraries

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 65-79

  McMartin, Flora ^a   Iverson, Ellen ^b   Wolf, Alan ^c   Morrill, Joshua ^d   Morgan, Glenda ^e   Manduca, Cathryn ^b  

^a Broad based Knowledge   (United States)

^b CARLETON COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^d Morrill Solutions   (United States)

^e GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital library; Education; User study

Indexed keywords

EID: 48449094638     PISSN: 14325012     EISSN: 14321300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00799-008-0036-y     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. American Association of University Professors: Background facts on contingent faculty. http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/issues/contingent/contingentfacts. htm (2007 )
2. Bargozzi R., Davis R. and Warsha P. (1992). Development and test of a theory of technological learning and usage. Hum. Relations 45(7): 660-686
3. Bates, M.S., Loddington, S.P., et al.: Rights and rewards project academic survey, final report. http://rightsandrewards.lboro.ac.uk/files/ resourcesmodule/@random43cbae8b0d0ad/1150709518_Final_Report_of_Survey.pdf (2006 )
4. Bates M.S. and Loddington S.P. (2006). Rights and rewards in blended institutional repositories project. ALISS Q. 1(2): 47-51
5. Bartolo, L., Diekema, A., Khoo, M., McMartin, F.: Survey of Evaluation Projects in the National Science Digital Library, final report. NSDL PI Meeting, Washington D.C., October (2006)
6. 2. http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/archive/cl1/ilt/default.asp (2000 )
7. Bell, V., Rothery, A.: E-Sharing: Developing Use of E-repositories and E-libraries for Learning and Teaching. West Midlands Share Project: University of Worcester (2006)
8. Bishop A., Van House N. and Buttenfield B. (2003). Digital Library Use: Social Practices in Design and Evaluation. MIT Press, Cambridge
9. Borgman, C.L., Leazer, G.H. et al.: How geography professors select materials for classroom lectures: implications for the design of digital libraries. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital libraries, ACM Press, Tuscon, Arizona (2004)
10. Perez-Quinones M.A. and Capra R.G. (2005). Using web search engines to find and refind information. Computer 38(10): 36-42
11. Carson S.: 2005 program evaluation findings report. MITOpenCourseWare. http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/about/stats/index.htm (2007)
12. Chang, A., Matyas, M. et al.: I came, I found it, I used it, and it made a difference. Washington, D.C., American Society for Microbiology: 8 (2004)
13. Chism N. (2004). Using a framework to engage faculty in instructional technologies. Educause Q. 27(2): 39-45
14. Cohen J. (1992). A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112(1): 155-159
15. Davis F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3): 319-340
16. Duval, E.: The technology of open education. Presentation at Open Education 2006: Community, Culture, and Content, Logan Utah (2006)
17. Gibbs E.J. and Major C.H. (2004). Faculty perception of the costs and benefits of instructional technology: implications for faculty work. J. Faculty Dev. 19(2): 77-88
18. Giersch, S., Klotz, E.A., et al.: If you build it, will they come? Participant involvement in digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine 10(7/8) (2004)
19. Gilbert, S.: The Beauty of Low Threshold Applications. Syllabus Magazine. http://campustechnology.com/articles/38981/ (2002)
20. Glaser B. and Strauss A. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago, IL
21. Green, D.: Using digital images in teaching and learning: perspectives from liberal arts institutions. http://www.academiccommons.org/imagereport (2006)
22. Hagner P. (2000). Faculty engagement and support in the new learning environment. Educause Rev. 35(5): 27-37
23. Harley D. (2004). The Use of Digital Resources in Humanities and Social Science Undergraduate Education. Center for Studies in Higher Education, Berkeley, CA
24. Harley, D.: Why understanding the use and users of OERs matters. In: Iiuoshi, T., Kumar, V. (eds.) Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education Through Open Technology, Open Content and Open Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008, Forthcoming)
25. IES National Center for Education Statistics: Digest of Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d06/tables/dt06_237.asp (2003)
26. Khoo, M., Donahue, R.: Evaluating digital libraries with Webmetrics. In: Proceedings from the ACM IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, BC (2007)
27. Koppi T. and Bogle L. (2004). Institutional use of learning objects: lessons learned and future directions. J Educ Multimed Hypermedia 13(4): 449-463
28. Lean J. and Moizer J. (2006). Simulations and games: use and barriers in higher education. Active Learn Higher Educ. 7(3): 227-242
29. Lerman, S., Miyagawa, S., et al.: OpenCourseWare: Building a culture of sharing. In: Iiuoshi, T., Kumar, V. (eds.) Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education Through Open Technology, Open Content and Open Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008, forthcoming)
30. Lossau, N.: Search engine technology and digital libraries: libraries need to discover the academic internet. D-Lib Magazine 10(6) (2004)
31. Lynch, C., Garcia-Molina, H.: Interoperability, scaling, and the digital libraries research agenda. http://www.hpcc.gov/reports/reports-nco-iita-dlw/ main.html (1995 )
32. Macdonald R.H. and Manduca C.A. (2005). Teaching methods in undergraduate geoscience courses: results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge survey of US faculty. J. Geosci. Educ. 53(3): 237
33. Manduca, C.A., Iverson, E.R., et al.: Influencing user behavior through digital library design: an example from the geosciences. D-Lib 11(5) (2005)
34. Manduca, C.A., Fox, S., et al.: Digital library as network and community center. D-Lib 12(12) (2006)
35. Marchioni G. (2006). Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Communications 49(4): 41-46
36. Mason B. (2006). Omniture and other evaluation tools for ComPADRE. NSDL 2006 Annual PI Meeting, Washington DC
37. Matkin G. (2002). Learning Object Repositories: Problems and Promise. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation Menlo Park, CA
38. McMartin, F., Iverson, E., et al.: Factors motivating use of digital libraries. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, ACM Press, Tuscon (2006) NSDL: About NSDL. http://nsdl.org/about/ (2007)
39. Russell, D.M.: What are they thinking? Searching for the mind of the searcher. Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, BC (2007)
40. Smith, M., Barton, M., Bass, M., Branschofsky, M., McClellan, G., Stuve, D., Tansley, R., Walker, J.H.: DSPACE: an open source dynamic digital repository. D-Lib Magazine 9(1) (2003)
41. Spotts T. and Bowman M. (1995). Faculty use of instructional technologies in higher education. Educ. Technol. 35(2): 56-64
42. Teevan, J., Alvarado, C., et al.: The Perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search. In: Proceedings, SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, ACM Press, Tuscon (2004)
43. Thomas, A., Rothery, A.: Online repositories for learning materials. Ariadne 45 (2005)
44. Thong J.Y.L. and Hong W.Y. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context and individual differences?. International J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 57(3): 215-242
45. Uijtdehaage S.H.J. and Contini J. (2003). Sharing digital teaching resources: breaking down barriers by addressing the concerns of the faculty members. Acad. Med. 78(3): 286-294
46. Van House, N.A., Butler, M.H., et al.: User-centered iterative design for digital libraries: the cypress experience. D-Lib Magazine 2(2) (1996)
47. Wolcott L. and Betts K. (1999). What's in it for me? incentives for faculty participation in distance education. J. Dist. Educ. 14(2): 34-49