Erratum: Numerical methods for reachable space generation of humanoid robots (International Journal of Robotics Research 27:8 (935-950) DOI 10.1177/0278364908095142);Numerical methods for reachable space generation of humanoid robots

International Journal of Robotics Research

Volumn 27, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 935-950

  Guan, Yisheng ^a   Yokoi, Kazuhito ^a   Xianmin Zhang, ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^b SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Humanoid manipulation; Humanoid robot; Monte Carlo method; Reachable boundary; Workspace

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); MONTE CARLO METHODS; MOTION PLANNING; NUMERICAL METHODS; ROBOTICS;

HUMANOID MANIPULATION; HUMANOID ROBOT; KINEMATIC CONSTRAINTS; NUMBER OF DEGREES OF FREEDOM; OPTIMIZATION BASED METHODS; OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES; REACHABLE BOUNDARY; WORKSPACE;

ROBOT PROGRAMMING;

EID: 48249111391     PISSN: 02783649     EISSN: 17413176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/02783649090280070602     Document Type: Erratum

References (23)

1. Alciatore, D. and Ng, C. (1994). Determining manipulator workspace boundaries using the Monte Carlo method and least squares segmentation. In Robotics: Kinematics, Dynamics and Control, presented at the 1994 ASME Design Technical Conferences, 23rd Biennial Mechanisms Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota, September 11-14, 1994.
2. Chirikjian, G. and Ebert-Uphoff, I. (1998). Numerical convolution on the euclidean group with applications to workspace generation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14 (1). 123-136.
3. Gosselin, C. and Angeles, J. (1991). A global performance index for the kinematic optimization of robotic manipulators. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 113, No. 9, September 1991, pp. 220-226.
4. Guan, Y. and Zhang, H. (2003). Workspace of 2D multifingered manipulation. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, Oct. 27-31, 2003, pp. 3705-3710.
5. Gupta, K. (1986). On the nature of robot workspace. International Journal of Robotics Research, 5 (2). 112-121.
6. Kanehiro, F. et al. (2002). Open architecture huamoid robot platform. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, D.C., USA, May 11-15, 2003, pp. 24-30.
7. Kaneko, K. et al. (2004). Humanoid robot hrp-2. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, New Orleans, LA, USA, April 20-May 1, 2004, pp. 1083-1090.
8. Kerr, J. and Roth, B. (1986). Analysis of multifingered hands. International Journal of Robotics Research, 4 (4). 3-17.
9. Kim, D., Chung, W. and Youm, Y. (1997). Geometrical approach for the workspace of 6-dof parallel manipulators. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, USA, May 11-25, 1997, pp. 2986-2991.
10. Kohli, D. and Spanos, J. (1985). Workspace analysis of mechanical manipulators using polynomial discriminants. ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, 107: 209-215.
11. Kuffner, J. et al. (2002). Self-collision detection and prevention for humanoid robots. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, D.C., USA, May 11-15, 2002, pp. 2265-2270.
12. Kumar, V. (1992). Characterization of workspaces of parallel manipulators. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 114 (3). 368-375.
13. Lai, Z. and Meng, C. (1988). The dexterous workspace of simple manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 4 (1). 99-103.
14. Merlet, J., Gosselin, C. and Nouly, N. (1998). Workspaces of planar parallel manipulators. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 33 (1). 7-20.
15. Monsarrat, B. and Gosselin, C. (2003). Workspace analysis and optimal design of a 3-leg 6-dof parallel platform mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 19 (6). 954-966.
16. Neo, E.S. et al. (2002). Whole body teleoperation of a humanoid robot - searching for stable and reachable space for hand. In Proceedings of 20th National Conference of Robot Society of Japan (in Japanese). Osaka, Japan, Oct. 12-14, 2002.
17. Pinter, J. (1996). Global Optimization in Action. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. Rastegar, J. and Perel, D. (1988). Generation of manipulator workspace boundary geometry using the monte carlo method and interactive computer graphics. In ASME Trends and Developments in Mechanisms, Machines, and Robotics, presented at the 1988 ASME Design Technology Conference, 20th Biennial Mechanisms Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, September 25-28, 1988, Vol. 3, pp. 299-305.
19. Vafa, Z. and Dubowsky, S. (1990). The kinematics and dynamics of space manipulators: The virtual manipulator approach. International Journal of Robotics Research, 9 (4). 3-21.
20. Wang, Y. and Chirikjian, G. (2004). Workspace generation of hyper-redundant manipulators as a diffusion process on se(n). IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 20 (3). 399-408.
21. Yang, J., Abdel-Malek, K. and Nebel, K. (2005). Reach envelope of a 9-degree-of-freedom model of the upper extremity. International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 20 (4). 240-259.
22. Yang, G. et al. (2006). Workspace performance optimization of fully restrained cable-driven parallel manipulators. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, Oct. 9-13, 2006, pp. 85-90.
23. Zhang, H. (1993). Efficient evaluation of the feasibility of robot displacement trajectories. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23 (1). 324-330.