Discrimination between glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes using quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 47, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 3374-3380

  DeLeón Ortega, Julio E ^a   Arthur, Stella N ^a   McGwin Jr , Gerald ^a,b   Xie, Aiyuan ^a   Monheit, Blythe E ^a   Girkin, Christopher A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC DISK CUP; OPTIC NERVE; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PHOTOGRAPHY; POLARIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; RETINA NERVE CELL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASER; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBER; OPHTHALMOSCOPE; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PATHOLOGY; RETINA GANGLION CELL; ROC CURVE;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LASERS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE FIBERS; OPHTHALMOSCOPES; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC DISK; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; ROC CURVE; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE;

EID: 33748103920     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1239     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Berry CC, et al. Discriminating between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:985-993.
2. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Fontana L, Hitchings RA. Identifying early glaucomatous changes: comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2272-2277.
3. Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:140-145.
4. Miglior S, Guareschi M, Albe E, et al. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:26-33.
5. Kanamori A, Nagai-Kusuhara A, Escano MF, et al. Comparison of confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, scanning laser polarimetry and optical coherence tomography to discriminate ocular hypertension and glaucoma at an early stage. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:58-68.
6. Weinreb RN, Bowd C, Greenfield DS, Zangwill LM. Measurement of the magnitude and axis of corneal polarization with scanning laser polarimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:901-906.
7. Zhou Q, Weinreb RN. Individualized compensation of anterior segment birefringence during scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2221-2228.
8. Jaffe GJ, Caprioli J. Optical coherence tomography to detect and manage retinal disease and glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:156-169.
9. Miglior S, Casula M, Guareschi M, et al. Clinical ability of Heidelberg retinal tomograph examination to detect glaucomatous visual field changes. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1621-1627.
10. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
11. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Weinreb RN. Comparison of the GDx VCC scanning laser polarimeter, HRT II confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope, and stratus OCT optical coherence tomograph for the detection of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:827-837.
12. Girkin CA, McGwin G Jr, Long C, et al. Subjective and objective optic nerve assessment in African Americans and whites. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2272-2278.
13. Stein DM, Wollstein G, Schuman JS. Imaging in glaucoma. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2004;17:33-52.
14. Chauhan DS, Marshall J. The interpretation of optical coherence tomography images of the retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2332-2342.
15. Girkin CA, McGwin G Jr, McNeal SF, DeLeon-Ortega J. Racial differences in the association between optic disc topography and early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3382-3387.
16. Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry CC, et al. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:121-127.
17. Mardin CY, Horn FK, Jonas JB, Budde WM. Preperimetric glaucoma diagnosis by confocal scanning laser tomography of the optic disc. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:299-304.
18. Mikelberg FS, Parfitt CM, Swindale NV, et al. Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma. 1995;4:242-247.
19. Blumenthal EZ, Williams JM, Weinreb RN, et al. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by use of optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2278-2282.
20. Zangwill LM, Chang CF, Williams JM, Weinreb RN. New technologies for diagnosing and monitoring glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:526-536.
21. Weinreb RN, Bowd C, Zangwill LM. Scanning laser polarimetry in monkey eyes using variable corneal polarization compensation. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:378-384.
22. Reus NJ, Lemij HG. Diagnostic accuracy of the GDx VCC for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1860-1865.
23. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-845.
24. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operator characteristic curve derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;:839-843.
25. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
26. Hodapp E, Parrish II RK, Anderson DR. Clinical Decision in Glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1993.
27. Abrams L, Scott IU, Spaeth GL, et al. Agreement among optometrists, ophthalmologist, and residents in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1662-1667.
28. Quigley HA. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:389-393.
29. Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:44-55.