Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy with modified opposition restriction orthosis in chronic hemiparetic patients with stroke

NeuroRehabilitation

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 239-244

  Kim, Dong Gyu ^a   Cho, Yun Woo ^a   Hong, Ji Heon ^b   Song, Jun Chan ^c   Chung, Hyun Ae ^d   Bai, Dai Seg ^a   Lee, Chu Hee ^a   Jang, Sung Ho ^a  

^a Yeungnam University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Daegu University   (South Korea)

^c Kyungbuk College   (South Korea)

^d Youngnam Foreign Language College   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Constraint induced movement therapy; Hemiparesis; Orthosis; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; INDEX FINGER; MALE; MANUAL FUNCTION TEST; MODIFIED OPPOSITION RESTRICTION ORTHOSIS; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY LOG; MOVEMENT THERAPY; ORTHOSIS; PURDUE PEGBOARD SCORE; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; THUMB; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 47849110354     PISSN: 10538135     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/nre-2008-23305     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. C. Bütefisch, H. Hummelsheim, P. Denzler and K.H. Mauritz, Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of centrally paretic hand, J. Neurol Sci 130 (1995), 59-68.
2. Y.W. Cho, S.H. Jang, Z.I. Lee, J.C. Song, H.K. Lee and H.Y. Lee, Effect and appropriate restriction period of constraint-induced movement therapy in hemiparetic patients with brain injury: a brief report, NeuroRehabilitation 20 (2005), 71-74.
3. S.C. Deluca, K. Echols, C.R. Law and S.L. Ramey, Intensive pediatric constraint-induced therapy for children with cerebral palsy: randomized, controlled, crossover trial, J Child Neuro 21 (2006), 931-938.
4. E.A. Fleishman and G.D. Elison, A factor analysis of fine manipulative tests, Journal of Applied Psychology 46 (1962), 96-105.
5. E.A. Fleishman and W.E. Hempel, A factor analysis of dexterity tests, Personnel Psychology 7 (1954), 15-32.
6. J. Gallus and V. Mathiowetz, Test-retest reliability of the Purdue Pegboard for persons with multiple sclerosis, Am J Occup Ther 57 (2003), 108-111.
7. C. Giacomozzi, D. Giansanti, S. Morelli, G. Maccioni and V. Macellari, Objective analysis of finger function, Hand Clin 19 (2003), 421-430.
8. M.Y. Kim, A Study of Manual Function Test for Stroke, Korean J Occup Ther 3 (1994), 20-26.
9. Y.H. Kim, J.W. Park, M.H. Ko, S.H. Jang and P.K. Lee, Plastic changes of motor network after constraint-induced movement therapy, Yonsei Med J 45 (2004), 241-246.
10. R. Magill, Motor Learning, (5th ed.), Boston: WCB/McGraw-Hill, 1998, 240-246.
11. W.H.R. Miltner, H. Bauder, M. Sommer, D. Psych, C. Dettmers and E.Taub, Effects of constraint-inducedmovement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication, Stroke 30 (1999), 586-592.
12. D.M. Morris, E. Taub and V.W. Mark, Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol, Eura Medicophys 42 (2006), 257-268.
13. R. Nakamura, S. Moriyama, Y. Yamada and K. Seki, Recovery of impaired motor function of the upper extremity after stroke, Tohoku J Exp Med 168 (1992), 11-20.
14. H. Nakayama, H.S. Jorgenson and H.O. Raaschou, Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patient, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75 (1994), 394-398.
15. S.J. Page, S.A. Sisto, P. Levine, M.V. Johnston and M. Hughes, Modified constraint induced therapy: a randomized feasibility and efficacy study, J Rehabil Res Dev 38 (2001), 583-590.
16. S.J. Page, S.A. Sisto, P. Levine and R.E. McGrath, Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85 (2004), 14-18.
17. N. Smania, Constraint-induced movement therapy: an original concept in rehabilitation, Eura Medicophys 42 (2006), 239-240.
18. A. Sterr and A. Saunders, CI therapy distribution: Theory, evidence and practice, Neurorehabilitation 21 (2006), 93-95.
19. E. Taub, Movement in nonhuman primate derived of somatosensory feedback, Exerc Sports Sci Rev 4 (1976), 335-374.
20. E.Taub, J.E. Crago and G. Uswatte, Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation, Rehabil Psychol 43 (1998), 152-170.
21. E. Taub, N.E. Miller, T.A. Novack, E.W. Cook, III., W.D. Flemming, C.S. Nepomuceno, J.S. Connell and J.E. Crago, Technic to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 (1993), 347-354.
22. E. Taub, R.D. Pidikiti, S.C. DeLuca and J.E. Crago, Effects of motor restriction of an unimpaired upper extremity and training on improving functional tasks and altering brain behaviors, in: Imaging in Neurologic Rehabilitation, J.F. Toole and D.C. Good, eds, Demos Vermande, New York, 1996, pp. 133-154.
23. E. Taub and G. Uswatte, Constraint-Induced Movement therapy: Answers and questions after two decades of research, Neurorehabilitation 21 (2006), 93-95.
24. E. Taub, G. Uswatte and T. Elbert, New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research, Nat Rev Neurosci 3 (2002), 228-236.
25. J. Tiffin, Purdue Pegboard Examiner Manual, Chicago, Science Research Associates, 1968.
26. G. Uswatte and E. Taub, Implications of the learned nonuse formulation for measuring rehabilitation outcomes: lessons from Constraint-Induced Movement therapy, Rehabil Psycho 50 (2005), 34-42.
27. G. Uswatte, E. Taub, D. Morris, K. Light and P.A. Thompson, The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke, Neurology 67 (2006), 1189-1194.
28. G. Uswatte, E. Taub, D. Morris, M. Vignolo and K. McCulloch, Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use, Stroke 36 (2005), 2493-2496.
29. J.G. Yen, R.Y. Wang, H.H. Chen and C.T. Hong, Effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on upper limb function in stroke subjects, Acta Neurol Taiwan 14 (2005), 16-20.