Intensive pediatric constraint-induced therapy for children with cerebral palsy: Randomized, controlled, crossover trial

Journal of Child Neurology

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 931-938

  Deluca, Stephanie C ^a,e   Echols, Karen ^b   Law, Charles R ^c   Ramey, Sharon L ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^c University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

^d GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARTICLE; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ARM; CASTS, SURGICAL; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; MOVEMENT; PARESIS; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33846282309     PISSN: 08830738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/08830738060210110401     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hagberg B, Hagberg G, Beckung E, Uverbrant P: Changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. VIII. Prevalence and origin in the birth year period 1994-1994. Acta Pediatr 2001;90: 271-277.
2. Pellegrino L: Cerebral palsy, in Natshaw ML (ed): When Your Child Has a Disability, 2nd ed. Baltimore, Paul H. Brookes, 2000.
3. Barry M: Evidence-based practice in pediatric physical therapy. Phys Ther Mag 2001;Nov:39-51.
4. Bower E, McCellan DL: Evaluating therapy in cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev 1994;20:409-419.
5. Campbell SK: Introduction to special issue. Phys Ther 1990;2: 123-125.
6. Campbell SK: Physical Therapy for Children, Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1994.
7. Hur JJ: Review of research on therapeutic interventions for children with cerebral palsy. Acta Neurol Scand 1995;91:423-432.
8. Kurtz LA: Understanding rehabilitation therapies, in Natshaw ML (ed): When Your Child Has a Disability, 2nd ed. Baltimore, Paul H. Brookes, 2000.
9. Bobath K, Bobath B: The neuro-developmental treatment, in Scrutton D (ed): Management of Motor Disorders in Children with Cerebral Palsy, Philadelphia, JB Lippincott, 1984.
10. Campbell SK: Physical Therapy for Children, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1997.
11. Case-Smith J, Allen AS, Pratt PN: Occupational Therapy for Children, 3rd edition. St Louis, Mosby, 1996.
12. Tecklin J: Pediatric Physical Therapy, Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1989.
13. Tecklin J: Pediatric Physical Therapy, 3rd edition. Philadelphia, Lippincott, 1999.
14. Taub E: Overcoming leaned nonuse: A new approach to treatment in physical medicine, in Carlson JG, Seifert JG, Birbaumer N (eds): Clinical Applied Psychophysiology, New York, Plenum, 1994, 185-220.
15. Taub E: Increasing behavioral plasticity following central nervous system damage in monkeys and man: A method with potential application in human developmental disability, in Julsz B, Kovacs I (eds): Maturational Windows and Adult Cortical Plasticity. SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, vol 23. Redwood City, CA, Addison Wesley, 1995, 201-205.
16. Taub E, Crago JE, Burgio LD, et al: An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: Overcoming learned nonuse by shaping. J Exp Analysis Behav 1994;61:281-293.
17. Taub E, Pidikiti RD, DeLuca SC, Crago JE: Effects of motor restriction of an unimpaired UE and training on improving functional tasks and altering brain/behaviors, in Toole J (ed): Imaging and Neurological Rehabilitation, New York, Sage, 1995, 133-153.
18. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al: Techniques to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:347-354.
19. Taub E, Wolf SL: Constraint induced movement techniques to facilitate UE use in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 1997;3:38-61.
20. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, et al: Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000;31: 1210-1216.
21. Taub E, Crago JE: Overcoming learned nonuse: A new behavioral approach to physical medicine, in Kikuchi T, Sakuma H, Saito I, Tsubio K (eds): Biobehavioral Self-Regulation: Eastern and Western Perspectives, Tokyo, Springer-Verlag, 1995, 2-9.
22. DeLuca SC, Echols K, Ramey SL, Taub E: Pediatric constraint-induced movement therapy for a young child: Two episodes of care. J Am Phys Ther Assoc 2003;83:1003-1013.
23. Charles J, Lavinder G, Gordon AM: Effects of constraint-induced therapy on hand function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther 2001;13:68-76.
24. Willis JK, Morello A, Davie A, et al: Forced use treatment of childhood hemiparesis. Pediatrics 2002;110:94-96.
25. Karman N, Maryles MA, Baker RW, et al: Constraint-induced movement therapy for hemiplegic children with acquired brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2003;18:259-267.
26. Crocker MD, MacKay-Lyons M, McDonnell E: Forced use of the upper extremity in cerebral palsy: A single case design. Am J Occup Ther 1997;51:824-833.
27. Taub E, Ramey SL, DeLuca S, Echols S: Efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy for children with cerebral palsy with asymmetric motor impairment. Pediatrics 2004;113: 305-312.
28. Law M, Cadman D, Rosenbaum P, et al: Neurodevelopmental therapy and UE inhibitive casting for children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1991;33:379-387.
29. Folio R, Fewell R: Peabody Developmental Motor Scales and Activity Cards, Hingham, MA, DLM Teaching Resources, 1983.
30. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R: Constraint-induced movement therapy: A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - A clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999;36:237-251.
31. Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, et al: Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on chronic stroke patients: A replication. Stroke 1999;30(3):586-592.