Trust in surveys and games - A methodological contribution on the influence of money and location

Journal of Economic Psychology

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 522-542

  Holm, Håkan ^a   Nystedt, Paul ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Financial incentives; Social behavior; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 47749146936     PISSN: 01674870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2007.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderhub V., Müller R., and Schmidt C. Design and evaluation of an economic experiment via the internet. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46 (2001) 227-247
2. Arrow K. Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1972) 343-362
3. Bellemare C., and Kröger S. On representative social capital. European Economic Review 51 3 (2007) 183-202
4. Buchan N., and Croson R. The boundaries of trust: Own and others' actions in the US and China. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 55 (2004) 485-504
5. Camerer C., and Hogarth R.M. The effects of financial incentives in economic experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18 (1999) 7-42
6. Camerer C. Behavioral game theory, experiments in strategic interaction (2003), Princeton University Press, Princeton
7. Camerer C., Ho T.-K., and Chong J.-.K. A cognitive hierarchy model of games. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 3 (2004) 861-898
8. Camerer C., Loewenstein G., and Prelec D. Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature. 43 (2005) 9-64
9. Charness G., Haruvy E., and Sonsino D. Social distance and reciprocity: An Internet experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 63 1 (2007) 88-103
10. Charness G., and Levin D. When optimal choices feel wrong: A laboratory study of bayesian updating, complexity, and affect. American Economic Review 95 4 (2005) 1300-1309
11. Cox J., and Deck C. On the nature of reciprocal motives. Economic Inquiry 43 3 (2005) 623-635
12. Cubitt R.P., Starmer C., and Sugden R. On the validity of the random lottery incentive system. Experimental Economics 1 (1998) 115-131
13. Dufwenberg M., and Gneezy U. Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game. Games & Economic Behavior 30 (2000) 163-182
14. Fehr E., Fischbacher, U., Rosenbladt, B. V., Schupp, J., Wagner, G. (2003). A nation-wide laboratory - Examining trust and trustworthiness by integrating experiments in representative surveys. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zürich, Working Paper No. 141.
15. Fukuyama F. Trust (1995), Free Press, New York
16. Glaeser E., Laibson D., Scheinkman C., and Soutter L. Measuring trust. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 115 (2000) 811-846
17. Gunnthorsdottir A., McCabe K., and Smith V. Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology 23 (2002) 49-66
18. Güth W., Schmidt C., and Sutter M. Fairness in the mail and opportunism in the Internet: A newspaper experiment on ultimatum bargaining. German Economic Review 4 (2003) 243-265
19. Güth W., Schmidt C., and Sutter M. Bargaining outside the lab - A newspaper experiment of a three-person ultimatum game. Economic Journal 117 (2007) 449-469
20. Gächter S., Herrmann B., and Thöni C. Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: Survey and experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 55 (2004) 505-531
21. Hoffman E., McCabe K., Shachat K., and Smith V. Preferences, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior 7 (1994) 346-380
22. Holm H., and Danielson A. Tropic trust versus Nordic trust. Experimental evidence from Tanzania and Sweden. Economic Journal 115 (2005) 505-532
23. Holm H., and Nystedt P. Intra-generational trust - A semi-experimental study of trust among different generations. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 58 (2005) 403-419
24. Inglehart R. Modernization and postmodernization, cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies (1997), Princeton University Press, Princeton
25. Jianakoplos N., and Bernasek A. Are women more risk-averse?. Economic Inquiry 46 4 (1998) 320-330
26. Johansson-Stenman O., Mahmud M., and Martinsson P. Does stake size matter in trust games?. Economics Letters 88 3 (2005) 365-369
27. Kirchsteiger G., Rigotti L., and Rustichini A. Your morals might be your moods. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 59 2 (2006) 155-172
28. Knack S., and Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 112 (1997) 1251-1288
29. McCabe K., Houser D., Ryan L., Smith V., and Trouard T. A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 98 (2001) 11832-11835
30. Putnam R.D. Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of the American community (2001), Simon & Schuster, New York
31. Rubinstein A. Instinctive and cognitive reasoning: A study of response times. Economic Journal 117 (2007) 1243-1259
32. Shavit T., Sonsino D., and Benzion U. A comparative study of lotteries-evaluation in class and on the web. Journal of Economic Psychology. 22 (2001) 483-491
33. Smith V. Behavioral economics research and the foundations of economics. Journal of Socio-Economics 34 (2005) 135-150
34. Starmer C., and Sugden R. Does the random lottery incentive system elicit true preferences? An experimental investigation. American Economic Review 81 (1991) 971-978
35. Sutter M., and Kocher M. Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups. Games and Economic Behavior 59 2 (2007) 364-382
36. Zak P., and Knack S. Trust and growth. Economic Journal 111 (2001) 295-321