Links between floral morphology and floral visitors along an elevational gradient in a Penstemon hybrid zone

Oikos

Volumn 117, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1064-1074

  Kimball, Sarah ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b The University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEE; BIRD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELEVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; FLOWER VISITING; HERB; HYBRID ZONE; MORPHOLOGY; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SIERRA NEVADA [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; APOIDEA; HALICTIDAE; PENSTEMON; PENSTEMON DAVIDSONII; PENSTEMON NEWBERRYI; TROCHILIDAE;

EID: 47749105343     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16573.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aigner, P. A. 2001. Optimality modeling and fitness tradeoffs: when should plants become pollinator specialists? Oikos 95 : 177 184.
2. Aldridge, G. Campbell, D. R. 2007. Variation in pollinator preference between two Ipomopsis contact sites that differ in hybridization rate Evolution 61 : 99 110.
3. Altshuler, D. L. et al. 2004. Resolution of a paradox: hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 51 : 17731 17736.
4. Arnold, M. L. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press.
5. Barton, N. H. Gale, K. S. 1993. Genetic analysis of hybrid zones Harrison, R. G. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press 13 45.
6. Broyles, S. B. 2002. Hybrid bridges to gene flow: a case study in milkweeds (Asclepias) Evolution 56 : 1943 1953.
7. Buggs, R. J. A. Pannell, J. R. 2006. Rapid displacement of a monoecious plant lineage is due to pollen swamping by a dioecious relative Curr. Biol. 16 : 996 1000.
8. Campbell, D. R. Waser, N. M. 1996. Mechanisms of hummingbird-mediated selection for flower width in Ipomopsis aggregata Ecology 77 : 1463 1472.
9. Campbell, D. R. et al. 1997. Analyzing pollinator-mediated selection in a plant hybrid zone: hummingbird visitation patterns on three spatial scales Am. Nat. 149 : 295 315.
10. Campbell, D. R. et al. 2002. Predicting patterns of mating and potential hybridization from pollinator behavior Am. Nat. 159 : 438 450.
11. Campbell, D. R. et al. 2005. Ecophysiology of first and second generation hybrids in a natural plant hybrid zone Oecologia 144 : 214 225.
12. Chabot, B. F. Billings, W. D. 1972. Origins and ecology of the Sierran alpine flora and vegetation Ecol. Monogr. 42 : 163 199.
13. Castellanos, M. C. et al. 2003. Pollen transfer by hummingbirds and bumblebees, and the divergence of pollination modes in Penstemon Evolution 57 : 2742 2752.
14. Chari, J. Wilson, P. 2001. Factors limiting hybridization between Penstemon spectabilis and Penstemon centranthifolius Can. J. Bot. 79 : 1439 1448.
15. Chase, V. C. Raven, P. H. 1975. Evolutionary and ecological relationships between Aquilegia formosa and A. pubescens (Ranunculaceae), two perennial plants Evolution 29 : 474 486.
16. Clausen, J. et al. 1940. Experimental studies on the nature of species. III. Environmental responses of climatic races of Achillea Carnegie Inst. WA pub. No. 520.
17. Crosswhite, F. S. Crosswhite, C. D. 1966. Insect pollinators of Penstemon series Graciles (Scrophulariaceae) with notes on Osmia and other Megachilidae Am. Midl. Nat. 76 : 450 467.
18. Datwyler, S. L. Wolfe, A. D. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships and morphological evolution in Penstemon subgenus Dasanthera (Veronicaceae) Syst. Bot. 29 : 165 175.
19. Dilley, J. D. et al. 2000. The radiation of Calochortus: generalist flowers moving through a mosaic of potential pollinators Oikos 89 : 209 222.
20. Eckert, C. G. 2002. Effect of geographical variation in pollinator fauna on the mating system of Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae) Int. J. Plant Sci. 163 : 123 132.
21. Endler, J. A. 1973. Gene flow and population differentiation Science 179 : 243 250.
22. Fabbro, T. Korner, C. 2004. Altitudinal differences in flower traits and reproductive allocation Flora 199 : 70 81.
23. Fenster, C. B. et al. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35 : 375 403.
24. Fulton, M. Hodges, S. A. 1999. Floral isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266 : 2247 2252.
25. Galen, C. Cuba, J. 2001. Down the tube: pollinators, predators, and the evolution of flower shape in the alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum Evolution 55 : 1963 1971.
26. Grant, V. 1949. Pollination systems as isolating mechanisms in Angiosperms Evolution 3 : 82 97.
27. Grant, K. A. Grant, V. 1968. Hummingbirds and their flowers. Columbia Univ. Press.
28. Herrera, C. M. 2005. Plant generalization on pollinators: species property or local phenomenon? Am. J. Bot. 92 : 13 20.
29. Johansen-Morris, A. D. Latta, R. G. 2006. Fitness consequences of hybridization between ecotypes of Avena barbata: hybrid breakdown, hybrid vigor, and transgressive segregation Evolution 60 : 1585 1595.
30. Johnston, M. O. 1991. Natural selection on floral traits in two species of Labelia with different pollinators Evolution 45 : 1468 1479.
31. Kalin Arroyo, M. et al. 1982. Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile. I. Pollination mechanisms and altitudinal variation Am. J. Bot. 69 : 82 97.
32. Kay, K. M. Schemske, D. W. 2003. Pollinator assemblages and visitation rates for 11 species of neotropical Costus (Costaceae) Biotropica 35 : 198 207.
33. Kephart, S. Theiss, K. 2003. Pollinator-mediated isolation in sympatric milkweeds (Asclepias): do floral morphology and insect behavior influence species boundaries? New Phytol. 161 : 265 277.
34. Kimball, S. 2007. Mechanisms defining ecological range limits in a Penstemon hybrid zone PhD thesis. Univ. of California, Irvine.
35. Lange, R. S. Scott, P. E. 1999. Hummingbird and bee pollination of Penstemon pseudospectabilis J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 126 : 99 106.
36. Lange, R. S. et al. 2000. Hummingbird-syndrome traits, breeding system, and pollinator effectiveness in two syntopic Penstemon species Int. J. Plant Sci. 161 : 253 263.
37. Leiss, K. A. et al. 2004. Heritability of nectar production in Echium vulgare Heredity 92 : 446 451.
38. McArthur, E. D. et al. 1998. Narrow hybrid zone between two subspecies of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata: Asteraceae). VI. Respiration and water potential Can. J. Bot. 76 : 567 574.
39. Memmott, J. 1999. The structure of a plant-pollinator food web Ecol. Lett. 2 : 276 280.
40. Moeller, D. A. 2005. Pollinator community structure and sources of spatial variation in plant-pollinator interactions in Clarkia xantiana ssp. xantiana Oecologia 142 : 28 37.
41. Olesen, J. M. Jordano, P. 2002. Geographic patterns in plant-pollinator mutualistic networks Ecology 83 : 2416 2424.
42. Price, M. V. et al. 2005. Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study Ecology 86 : 2106 2116.
43. Ramsey, J. et al. 2003. Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phyrmaceae) Evolution 57 : 1520 1534.
44. Roberts, W. M. 1995. Hummingbird licking behavior and the energetics of nectar feeding Auk 112 : 456 463.
45. Sahli, H. F. Conner, J. K. 2006. Characterizing ecological generalization in plant-pollination systems Oecologia 148 : 365 372.
46. Schemske, D. W. Bradshaw, H. D. 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 96 : 11910 11915.
47. Schwarzbach, A. E. et al. 2001. Transgressive character expression in a hybrid sunflower species Am. J. Bot. 88 : 270 277.
48. Scobell, S. A. Scott, P. E. 2002. Visitors and floral traits of a hummingbird-adapted cactus (Echinocereus coccineus) show only minor variation along an elevational gradient Am. Midl. Nat. 147 : 1 15.
49. Slatkin, M. 1973. Gene flow and selection in a cline Genetics 75 : 733 756.
50. Stebbins, G. L. 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I. Pollination mechanisms Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1 : 307 326.
51. Tepedino, V. J. et al. 1999. The reproductive biology and effective pollinators of the endangered beardtongue Penstemon penlandii (Scrophulariaceae) Plant Syst. Evol. 1999 : 39 54.
52. Torchio, P. F. 1974. Mechanisms involved in the pollination of Penstemon visited by the Masarid wasp, Pseudomasaris vespoides (Cresson) Pan-Pac. Entomol. 50 : 226 234.
53. Totland, Ø. 2001. Environment-dependent pollen limitation and selection on floral traits in an alpine species Ecology 82 : 2233 2244.
54. Vasquez, D. P. et al. 2005. Interaction frequency as a surrogate for total effect of animal mutualists on plants Ecol. Lett. 8 : 1088 1094.
55. Waser, N. M. et al. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters Ecology 77 : 1043 1060.
56. Wilson, P. et al. 2004. A multivariate search for pollination syndromes among penstemons Oikos 104 : 345 361.