Perceiving virtual geographical slant: Action influences perception

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 811-821

  Creem Regehr, Sarah H ^a   Gooch, Amy A ^a,b   Sahm, Cynthia S ^a   Thompson, William B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION; WALKING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EXERTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); SIZE PERCEPTION; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WALKING;

EID: 4744345384     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.811     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F. X., & Goodale, M. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Current Biology, 5, 679-685.
2. Bhalla, M., & Proffitt, D. R. (1999). Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1076-1096.
3. Bridgeman, B., & Huemer, V. (1998). A spatially oriented decision does not induce consciousness in a motor task. Consciousness & Cognition: An International Journal, 7, 454-464.
4. Bridgeman, B., Kirch, M., & Sperling, A. (1981). Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 336-342.
5. Bridgeman, B., Peery, S., & Anand, S. (1997). Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 456-469.
6. Burr, D. C., Morrone, M. C., & Ross, J. (2001). Separate visual representation for perception and action revealed by saccadic eye movements. Current Biology, 11, 798-802.
7. Carey, D. P. (2001). Do action systems resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 109-113.
8. Chao, L. L. Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 913-919.
9. Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12, 478-484.
10. Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (1998). Two memories for geographical slant: Separation and interdependence of action and awareness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 22-36.
11. Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2001a). Defining the cortical visual systems: "What", "where", and "how". Acta Psychologica, 107, 43-68.
12. Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2001b). Grasping objects by their handles: A necessary interaction between cognition and action. Journal of Ex perimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 218-228.
13. Epstein, W. (1981). The relationship between texture gradient and perceived slant in-depth: Direct or mediated? Perception, 10, 695-702.
14. Franz, V. H. (2001). Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 457-459.
15. Franz, V. H., Fahle, M., Bulthoff, H. H., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2001). Effects of visual illusion on grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1124-1144.
16. Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K. R., Bulthoff, H. H., & Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychological Science, 11, 20-25.
17. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Gibson, J. J., & Cornsweet, J. (1952). The perceived slant of visual surf aces-optical and geographical. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 11-15.
19. Glover, S. (2002). Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 288-292.
20. Glover, S. (in press). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
21. Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2002). Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning-control model of action. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 266-278.
22. Grafton, S. T., Fadiga, L., Arbib, M. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1997). Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage, 6, 231-236.
23. Grezes, J., & Decety, J. (2002). Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 212-222.
24. Haffenden, A. M., & Goodale, M. A. (1998). The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 122-136.
25. Haffenden, A. M., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). The effect of learned perceptual associations on visuomotor programming varies with kinematic demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 950-964.
26. Haffenden, A. M., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). Learned perceptual associations influence visuomotor programming under limited conditions: Kinematic consistency. Experimental Brain Research, 147, 485-493.
27. Hollerbach, J. M., Mills, R., Tristano, D., Christensen, R. R., Thompson, W. B., & Xu, Y. (2001). Torso force feedback realistically simulates slope on treadmill-style locomotion interfaces. International Journal of Robotics Research, 20, 939-952.
28. Hollerbach, J. M., Xu, Y., Christensen, R. R., & Jacobsen, S. C. (2000). Design specifications for the second generation Sarcos Treadport locomotion interface. In S. S. Nair (Ed.), Haptics Symposium, Proc. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, DSC-Vol. 69-2, Orlando (pp. 1293-1298). New York: ASME Press.
29. Hu, Y., Eagleson, R., & Goodale, M. A. (1999). The effects of delay on the kinematics of grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 109-116.
30. Hu, Y., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 856-868.
31. Jackson, S. R., & Shaw, A. (2000). The ponzo illusion affects grip force but not grip aperture scaling during prehension movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1-6.
32. Marotta, J. J., DeSouza, J. F. X., Haffenden, A. M., & Goodale, M. A. (1998). Does a monocularly presented size-contrast illusion influence grip aperture? Neuropsychologia, 36, 491-497.
33. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
34. Perrone, J. A. (1982). Visual slant underestimation: A general model. Perception, 11, 641-654.
35. Perrone, J. A., & Wenderoth, P. M. (1991). Visual slant underestimation. In S. R. Ellis (Ed.), Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 496-503). London: Taylor & Francis.
36. Philbeck, J. W., & Loomis, J. M. (1997). Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 72-85.
37. Premoze, S., Thompson, W. B., & Shirley, P. (1999). Geospecific rendering of alpine terrain. In D. Lischinski & G. W. Larson (Eds,), Rendering techniques 1999 (pp. 107-118). New York: Springer-Verlag.
38. Previc, F. H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 123-164.
39. Proffitt, D. R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, R., & Midgett, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 409-428.
40. Proffitt, D. R., Creem, S. H., & Zosh, W. (2001). Seeing mountains in molehills: Geographical slant perception. Psychological Science, 12, 418-423.
41. Proffitt, D. R., Stefanucci, J., Banton, T., & Epstein, W. (2003). The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science, 2, 106-112.
42. Rieser, J. J., Pick, H. L., Ashmead, D. H., & Garing, A. E. (1995). Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 480-497.
43. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umilta, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31-40.
44. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
45. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830-846.
46. Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8, 769-800.