Homology modelling of the Apis mellifera nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) and docking of imidacloprid and fipronil insecticides and their metabolites

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research

Volumn 19, Issue 3-4, 2008, Pages 245-261

  Rocher, A ^a   Marchand Geneste, N ^a  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES MOLÉCULAIRES   (France)

Author keywords

Apis mellifera; Docking; Fipronil; Homology modelling; Imidacloprid; Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor; QSAR

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; HYDROGEN BONDS; METABOLITES; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTOR; APIS MELLIFERA; DOCKING; FIPRONIL; HOMOLOGY MODELING; IMIDACLOPRIDS; NICOTINIC ACETYLCHOLINE; NICOTINIC ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTOR; QSAR; SCORING FUNCTIONS;

INSECTICIDES;

APIS MELLIFERA; TORPEDO MARMORATA;

EID: 47349132071     PISSN: 1062936X     EISSN: 1029046X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10629360802083731     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. L.A. Brown, M. Ihara, S.D. Buckingham, K. Matsuda, and D.B. Sattelle, Neonicotinoid insecticides display partial and super agonist actions on native insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, J. Neurochem. 99 (2006), pp. 608-615.
2. M. Tomizawa and J.E. Casida, Minor structural changes in nicotinoid insecticides confer differential subtype selectivity for mammalian nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, Br. J. Pharmacol. 127 (1999), pp. 115-122.
3. S. Suchail, G. De Sousa, R. Rahmani, and L.P. Belzunces, In vivo distribution and metabolisation of 14C-imidacloprid in different compartments of Apis mellifera L., Pest Manag. Sci. 60 (2004), pp. 1056-1062.
4. D. Guez, Effets sublétaux de l'imidaclopride sur le comportement de l'abeille domestique (Apis mellifera), Ph.D. diss., Pierre and Marie Curie University, 2001.
5. N. Unwin, Refined structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at 4 Å resolution, J. Mol. Biol. 346 (2005), pp. 967-989.
6. T. Schwede, J. Kopp, N. Guex, and M.C. Peitsch, SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server, Nucleic Acids Res. 31 (2003), pp. 3381-3385. Available at http://swissmodel.expasy.org/SWISS-MODEL.html (Accessed 4 July 2007).
7. 2 4.7, Accelrys Inc., USA.
8. K. Jozwiak, S. Ravichandran, J.R. Collins, and I.W. Wainer, Interaction of noncompetitive inhibitors with an immobilized α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor investigated by affinity chromatography, quantitative-structure activity relationship analysis, and molecular docking, J. Med. Chem. 47 (2004), pp. 4008-4021.
9. A. Mourot, Structure et Dynamique du Récepteur Nicotinique, PhD diss., Louis Pasteur University, 2004.
10. S.H. Thany, M. Crozatier, V. Raymond-Delpech, M. Gauthier, and G. Lenaers, Apisalpha2, apisalpha7-1 and apisalpha7-2: three new neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor alpha-subunits in the honeybee brain, Gene 344 (2005), pp. 125-132.
11. A.K. Jones, V. Raymond-Delpech, S.H. Thany, M. Gauthier, and D.B. Sattelle, The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene family of the honey bee, Apis mellifera, Genome Res. 16 (2006), pp. 1422-1430.
12. A.K. Jones and D.B. Sattelle, The cys-loop ligand-gated ion channel superfamily of the honeybee, Apis mellifera, Invertebr. Neurosci. 6 (2006), pp. 123-132.
13. P.H. Celie, S.E. van Rossum-Fikkert, W.J. van Dijk, K. Brejc, A.B. Smit, and T.K. Sixma, Nicotine and carbamylcholine binding to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as studied in AChBP crystal structures, Neuron. 41 (2004), pp. 907-914.
14. K. Brejc, W.J. van Dijk, R.V. Klaasen, M. Schuurmans, J. van der Oost, A.B. Smit, and T.K. Sixma, Crystal structure of an ACh-binding protein reveals the ligand-binding domain of nicotinic receptors, Nature 441 (2001), pp. 269-276.
15. S. Dutertre, A. Nicke, J.D.A. Tyndall, and R.J. Lewis, Determination of α-conotoxin binding modes on neuronal nocotinic acetylcholine receptors, J. Mol. Recognit. 17 (2004), pp. 339-347. Available at: www.imb.uq.edu.au/index.html?page=15581&pid=12142 (Accessed 11 February 2007).
16. Z. Pei, L. Yitong, L. Baofeng, and J.J. Gan, Dynamics of fipronil residue in vegetable-field ecosystem, Chemosphere 57 (2004), pp. 1691-1696.
17. R. Nauen, U. Ebbinghaus-Kintscher, and R. Schmuck, Toxicity and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor interaction of imidacloprid and its metabolites in Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Pest. Manag. Sci. 57 (2001), pp. 577-586.
18. A. Decourtye, Etude de l'impact de produits phytopharmaceutiques sur la survie et l'apprentissage associatif chez l'abeille domestique (Apis mellifera L.), PhD diss., Paris XI University, 2002.
19. AMPAC 8.16, Semichem Inc., USA.
20. Gaussian 98, Gaussian Inc., USA.
21. F.H. Allen, The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising, Acta Cryst. B 58 (2002), pp. 380-388.
22. N. Guex and M.C. Peitsch, SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modelling, Electrophoresis 18 (1997), pp. 2714-2723. Available at http://www.expasy.org/spdbv/ (Accessed 4 July 2007).
23. E. Gasteiger, A. Gattiker, C. Hoogland, I. Ivanyi, R.D. Appel, and A. Bairoch, ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis, Nucleic Acids Res. 31 (2003), pp. 3784-3788. Available at http://www.expasy.org/spdbv/ (Accessed 4 July 2007).
24. B. Boeckmann, M.C. Blatter, L. Famiglietti, U. Hinz, L. Lane, B. Roechertand, and A. Bairoch, Protein variety and functional diversity: Swiss-Prot annotation in its biological context, C. R. Biol. 328 (2005), pp. 882-899. Available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/swissprot/ (Accessed 4 July 2007).
25. R. Chenna, H. Sugawara, T. Koike, R. Lopez, T. Gibson, D. Higgins, and J. Thompson, Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs, Nucleic Acids Res. 31 (2003), pp. 3497-3500. Available at http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/ (Accessed 4 July 2007).
26. W.R.P. Scott, P.H. Hünenberger, I.G. Tironi, A.E. Mark, S.R. Billeter, J. Fennen, A.E. Torda, T. Huber, P. Krüger, and W.F. van Gunsteren, The GROMOS Biomolecular Simulation Program Package, J. Phys. Chem. A 102 (1999), pp. 3596-3607.
27. P. Dauber-Osguthorpe, V.A. Roberts, D.J. Osguthorpe, J. Wolff, M. Genest, and A.T. Hagler, Structure and energetics of ligand binding to proteins: Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase-trimethoprim, a drug-receptor system, Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 4 (1988), pp. 31-47.
28. C.M. Venkatachalam, X. Jiang, T. Oldfield, and M. Waldman, LigandFit: a novel method for the shape-directed rapid docking of ligands to protein active sites, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 21 (2003), pp. 289-307.
29. A. Krammer, P.D. Kirchhoff, X. Jiang, C.M. Venkatachalam, and M. Waldman, Ligscore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities, J. Mol. Graph. Model. 23 (2005), pp. 395-407.
30. D.K. Gehlhaar, D. Bouzida, and P.A. Rejto, Rational Drug Design: Novel Methodology and Practical Applications, American Chemical Society, Washington, 1999.
31. A.N. Jain, Scoring noncovalent protein-ligand interactions: a continuous differentiable function tuned to compute binding affinities, J. Comput. -Aided Mol. Des. 10 (1996), pp. 427-440.
32. I. Muegge and Y.C. Martin, A General and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach, J. Med. Chem. 42 (1999), pp. 791-804.
33. InsightII 2000, Accelrys Inc., USA.
34. N. Marchand-Geneste and A. Rocher, Potential toxic risk of neurotoxic insecticide metabolites on honeybee and human nervous system. A SAR investigation, SETAC Europe 17th Annual Meeting, Porto, 2007.
35. N. Marchand-Geneste and A.J.M. Carpy, Interactions between two neurotoxic insecticides, imidacloprid and fipronil, and human nACh and GABAA Receptors: potential risk on human health, 12th International Workshop on Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships in Environmental Toxicology, Lyon, 2006.
36. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten, VMD: visual molecular dynamics, J. Mol. Graph. 14 (1996), pp. 33-38.
37. E. Audry, J.P. Dubost, J.C. Colleter, and P. Dallet, A new approach to structure-activity relations: the molecular lipophilicity potential, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 21 (1986), pp. 71-72.
38. I. Muegge, Effect of ligand volume correction on PMF scoring, J. Comput. Chem. 22 (2001), pp. 418-425.