Predicting and forecasting flow discharge at sites receiving significant lateral inflow

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 21, Issue 14, 2007, Pages 1848-1859

  Tayfur, Gokmen ^a   Moramarco, Tommaso ^b   Singh, Vijay P ^c  

^a IZMIR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Turkey)

^b CNR   (Italy)

^c Louisiana State University   (United States)

Author keywords

ANN; Feed forward back propagation; Flood hydrograph; Flow stage; Forecasting; Lead time; Modified Muskingum method; Prediction; Rating curve

Indexed keywords

FLOOD FORECASTING; FLOOD HYDROGRAPH; MODIFIED MUSKINGUM METHOD;

DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); ESTIMATION; FEEDFORWARD NEURAL NETWORKS; FLOW OF WATER; FORECASTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MULTILAYER NEURAL NETWORKS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

FLOODS;

DISCHARGE (FLUID MECHANICS); ESTIMATION; FEEDFORWARD NEURAL NETWORKS; FLOODS; FLOW OF WATER; FORECASTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MULTILAYER NEURAL NETWORKS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; DISCHARGE; ESTIMATION METHOD; FLOOD FORECASTING; FLOW MODELING; HYDROGRAPH; INFLOW; NONLINEARITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 34447334519     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.6320     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ASCE Task Committee. 2000a. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE 5(2): 115-123.
2. ASCE Task Committee. 2000b. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: hydrologic applications. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE 5(2): 124-137.
3. Barbetta S, Melone F, Moramarco T. 2004. A simple river stage forecasting model for sites without rating curve. In Applied Simulation and Modelling, Hamza MH (ed). IASTED Acta Press: Anaheim, CA; 207-212.
4. Barbetta S, Melone F, Moramarco T, Singh VP. 2003. Hydraulic-hydrologic components of an operational system for a dam management. In Watershed Hydrology, Singh VP, Yadava RN (eds). Allied Publishers: New Delhi; 252-262.
5. Boyle DP, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Koren V, Zhang Z, Smith M. 2001. Towards improved streamflow forecasts: the value of semi-distributed modeling. Water Resources Research 37(11): 2749-2759.
6. Cigizoglu HK. 2003. Estimation, forecasting and extrapolation of flow data by artificial neural networks. Hydrological Sciences Journal 48(3): 349-362.
7. Dawson WC, Wilby R. 1998. An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modeling. Hydrological Sciences Journal 43(1): 47-66.
8. Fenton JD. 1999. Calculating Hydrographs from Stage Records, XXVIII IAHR Congress, Graz, Austria, 22-27 August 1999.
9. Franchini M, Lamberti P. 1994. A flood routing Muskingum type simulation and forecasting model based on level data alone. Water Resources Research 30(7): 2183-2196.
10. French MN, Krajewski WF, Cuykendall RR. 1992. Rainfall forecasting in space and time using a neural network. Journal of Hydrology 137: 1-31.
11. Henderson FM. 1966. Open Channel Flow. MacMillan: New York.
12. Imrie CE, Durucan S, Korre A. 2000. River flow prediction using artificial neural networks: generalization beyond the calibration range. Journal of Hydrology 233: 138-153.
13. Kitanidis PK, Bras R. 1980. Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model. 2. Applications and results. Water Resources Research 16(6): 1034-1044.
14. Laio F, Porporato A, Reveth R, Ridolfi L. 2003. A comparison of nonlinear flood forecasting methods. Water Resources Research 39(5): 1129.
15. Michaud JD, Sorooshian S. 1994. Comparison of simple versus complex distributed runoff models on a midsize semiarid watershed. Water Resources Research 30(3): 593-605.
16. Moramarco T, Singh VP. 2000. A practical method for analysis of river waves and for kinematic wave routing in natural channel networks. Hydrological Processes 14: 51-62.
17. Moramarco T, Singh VP. 2001. Simple method for relating local stage and remote discharge. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE 6(1): 78-81.
18. Moramarco T, Saltalippi C, Singh VP. 2004. Estimating the cross-sectional mean velocity in natural channels using Chiu's velocity distribution. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 9(1): 42-50.
19. Moramarco M, Barbetta S, Melone F, Singh VP. 2005. Relating local stage and remote discharge with significant lateral inflow. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE 10(1):58-69.
20. Rajurkar MP, Kothyari UC, Chaube UC. 2002. Artificial neural networks for daily rainfall-runoff modeling. Hydrological Sciences Journal 47(6): 865-877.
21. Raudkivi AJ. 1979. Hydrology: An Advanced Introduction to Hydrological Processes and Modeling. Pergamon: New York.
22. Tayfur G. 2002. Artificial neural networks for sheet sediment transport. Hydrological Sciences Journal 47(6): 879-892.
23. Tokar AS, Johnson PA. 1999. Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE 4(3): 232-239.
24. Tokar SA, Markus M. 2000. Precipitation-runoff modelling using artificial neural networks and conceptual models. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE 5(2): 156-161.
25. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 1998. HEC-RAS: River Analysis System: Application Guide. Hydrologic Engineering Center: Davis, CA.