Know when to rock the boat: How faculty rationalize students' behaviors

Journal of General Internal Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 942-947

  Ginsburg, Shiphra ^a,b,d   Lingard, Lorelei ^a,b   Regehr, Glenn ^a,b   Underwood, Kathryn ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Medical education; Professionalism; Undergraduate education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PROFESSIONALISM; STUDENT ATTITUDE; SURGEON; TEACHER; VIDEORECORDING;

BEHAVIOR; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HUMANS; PATIENT CARE; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 46949106792     PISSN: 08848734     EISSN: 15251497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0401-3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arnold L. Assessing professional behaviour: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Acad Med. 2002;77(6):502-15.
2. Stern DT, ed. Measuring Medical Professionalism, 1st Edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press: 2006.
3. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Hatala R, et al. Context, conflict, and resolution: a new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Acad Med. 2000;10;75(10 Suppl):S6-11.
4. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L. Basing the evaluation of professionalism on observable behaviours: a cautionary tale. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S1-4.
5. Rees CE, Knight LV. Viewpoint: the trouble with assessing students' professionalism: theoretical insights from sociocognitive psychology. Acad Med. 2007;82(1):46-50.
6. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Lingard L. The disavowed curriculum: understanding students' reasoning in professionally challenging situations. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(12):1015-22.
7. Creswell JW. Data collection. In: Creswell JW, ed. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:109-35.
8. Glaser BG. Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press: 1992.
9. Kennedy TJ, Lingard L. Making sense of grounded theory in medical education. Med Educ. 2006;40(2):101-8.
10. NVivo qualitative data analysis program. Version 2.0. QSR International Pty Ltd.; 2002.
11. Burack JH, Irby DM, Carline JD, Root RK, Larson EB. Teaching compassion and respect: attending physicians' responses to problematic behaviours. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(1):49-55.
12. Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Stern DT, Lingard L. The anatomy of the professional lapse: bridging the gap between traditional frameworks and students' perceptions. Acad Med. 2002;77(6):516-22.
13. Wallace DS, Paulson RM, Lord CG, Bond CF. Which behaviours do attitudes predict? Meta-analyzing the effects of social pressure and perceived difficulty. Rev Gen Psychol. 2005;9(3):214-27.
14. Lavine E, Regehr G, Garwood K, Ginsburg S. The role of attribution to clerk factors and contextual factors in supervisors' perceptions of clerks' behaviours. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(4):403-8.
15. Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med. 1994;69(11):861-71.
16. Stern DT. Practicing what we preach? an analysis of the curriculum of values in medical education. Am J Med. 1998;104(6):569-75.
17. Fryer-Edwards K, Wilkins MD, Baernstein A, Braddock CH. Bringing ethics education to the clinical years: ward ethics sessions at the University of Washington. Acad Med. 2006;81(7):626-31.
18. Baernstein A, Fryer-Edwards K. Promoting reflection on professionalism: a comparison trial of educational interventions for medical students. Acad Med. 2003;78(7):742-7.