Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in proximal coronary arteries with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)

European Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1452-1463

  Chabbert, V ^a   Carrie, D ^a   Bennaceur, M ^a   Maupas, E ^a   Lauwers, V ^a   Mhem, M ^a   Lhermusier, T ^a   Elbaz, M ^a   Joffre, F ^a   Rousseau, H ^a   Puel, J ^a  

^a CHU RANGUEIL   (France)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Coronary stents; Multidetector computed tomography

Indexed keywords

AMIODARONE; ATENOLOL; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKING AGENT; IODINE; IOMEPROL; IOMERON 400; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34248680489     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0510-0     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Takagi T, Stankovic G, Finci L et al (2002) Results and long-term predictors of adverse clinical events after elective percutaneous interventions on unprotected left main coronary artery. Circulation 106:698-702
2. Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM, Yucel EK (2004) CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 232:18-37
3. Hong C, Chrysant GS, Woodard PK, Bae KT (2004) Coronary artery stent patency assessed with in-stent contrast enhancement measured at multi-detector row CT angiography: Initial experience. Radiology 233:286-291
4. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, Lamb HJ, Warda HMA, Vliegen HW, de Roos A, Van der Wall EE (2004) Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 94:427-430
5. Ligabue G, Rossi R, Ratti C, Favali M, Modena MG, Romagnoli R (2004) Noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery stents patency after PTCA: role of multislice computed tomography. Radiol Med (Torino) 108(1-2):128-137
6. Maintz D, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, Heindel W, Fischbach R (2003) Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography. Acta Radiol 44:597-603
7. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Rioufol G, Finet G, Pennec PY, Mansourati J, Blanc JJ, Boschat J (2005) Noninvasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 95:110-112
8. Cademartiri F, Marano R, Runza G, Mollet N, Nieman K, Luccichenti G, Gualerzi M, Brambilla L, Coruzzi P, Galia M, Midiri M (2005) Non-invasive assessment of coronary stent patency with multislice CT: preliminary experience. Radiol Med (Torino) 109(5-6):500-507
9. Mahnken AH, Buecker A, Wildberger JE, Ruebben A, Stanzel S, Vogt F, Günther RW, Blindt R (2003) Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: In vitro artefact evaluation. Invest Radiol 39(1):27-33
10. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama P, De Feyter P (2003) Noninvasive angiographic evaluation of coronary stents with multi-slice spiral computed tomography. Herz 28:136-142
11. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R, Flohr T, Rink M, Sommer T, Ozgün M, Heindel W, Fischbach R (2006) 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: In vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 16:818-826
12. Mahnken AH, Muhlenbruck G, Seyfarth H, Flohr T, Stanzel S, Wildberger JE, Gunther KW, Kuettner A (2006) 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents: A phantom study. Acta Radiol 47(1):36-42 36-42
13. Maintz D, Juergens KU, Wichter T, Grude M, Heindel W, Fischbach R (2003) Imaging artery stents using multislice computed tomography: In vitro evaluation. Eur Radiol 13:830-835
14. Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T, Herzog C, Stahl J, Stanzel S, Kuettner A, Wildberger JE, Gunther RW (2005) Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: Phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 40(1):8-13
15. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Flohr T, Krämer S, Wichter T, Heindel W, Fischbach R (2003) Improved coronary artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis detection using 16-slice computed-tomography and dedicated image reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 38:790-795
16. Seifarth H, Raupach R, Schaller S et al (2005) Assessment of coronary artery stents using 16-slice MDCT angiography: Evaluation of a dedicated reconstruction kernel and a noise reduction filter. Eur Radiol 15(4):721-726
17. Gaspart T, Halon DA, Lewis BS, Adawi S, Schliamser JE, Rubinshtein R, Flugelman MY, Peled N (2005) Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(8):1573-1579
18. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, Razzini C, Tomassini M, Massimiliano S, Simonetti G, Romeo F (2004) Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 25:1043-1048
19. Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D, Ulzheimer S, Wenkel E, Mennicke M, Bautz W, Kalender WA, Daniel WG, Achenbach S (2002) Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: Influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:911-916