Insights and applications: Evaluating community-based collaboration on federal lands and resources

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 419-429

  McKinney, Matthew ^a   Field, Patrick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Evaluation; Federal lands and resources; Rocky Mountain West

Indexed keywords

CIVIL SOCIETY; COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; LAND USE PLANNING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER;

NORTH AMERICA; ROCKY MOUNTAINS;

EID: 46749099839     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920701744215     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andrew, J. S. (2001) Examining the claims of environmental ADR: Evidence from waste management conflicts in Ontario and Massachusetts. J. Plan. Educ. Res., 21, pp. 166-183.
2. Beierle, T. C. and Cayford., J. (2002) Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions, Resources for the Future., Washington, DC
3. Bingham, G. (1986) Resolving environmental disputes, The Conservation Foundation., Washington, DC
4. Bourdeaux, C., O'Leary, R. and Thornburgh, R. (2001) Control, communication, and power: A study of the use of alternative dispute resolution for enforcement actions at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Negotiation J., 17, pp. 175-191.
5. Brick, P., Snow, D. and de Wetering, S. V. (2001) Across the great divide: Explorations in collaborative conservation and the American West, Island Press., Washington, DC
6. Bryan, T. A. (2004) Tragedy averted: The promise of collaboration. Society Nat. Resources, 17, pp. 881-896.
7. Coglianese, C. (2003) The promise and performance of environmental conflict resolution, pp. 69-86. Resources for the Future., Washington, DC
8. Conley, A. and Moote, M. A. (2003) Evaluating collaborative natural resources management. Society Nat. Resources, 16, pp. 371-386.
9. d'Estree, T. P. and Colby., B. G. (2004) Braving the currents: Evaluating environmental conflict resolution in the river basins of the American West, Kluewer Academic., Norwell, MA
10. Dukes, E. F. (2004) What we know about environmental conflict resolution: An analysis based on research. Conflict Resolut. Q, 22, pp. 191-220.
11. Forester, J. (1999) The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning Processes, MIT Press., Cambridge, MA
12. Hibbard, M. and Madsen, J. (2003) Environmental resistance to place-based collaboration in the U.S. West. Society Nat. Resources, 16, pp. 703-718.
13. Innes, J. (1999) The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement, pp. 631-671. Sage., Thousand Oaks, CA
14. Keiter, R. B. (2003) Keeping faith with nature: Ecosystems, democracy, and America's public lands, Yale University Press., New Haven, CT
15. Kemmis, D. (2001) This sovereign land: A new vision for governing the West, Island Press., Washington, DC
16. Kenney, D. S. (2000) Arguing about consensus: Examining the case against Western watershed initiatives and other collaborative groups active in natural resources management, Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law., Boulder, CO
17. Kenney, D. S., McAllister, S. T., Caile, W. H. and Peckman., J. S. (2000) The new watershed sourcebook: A directory and review of watershed initiatives in the Western United States, Natural Resources Law Center, University of Colorado School of Law., Boulder, CO
18. Kloppenberg, L. A. (2002) Implementation of court-annexed environmental mediation: The District of Oregon pilot project. Ohio State J. Dispute Resolut., 17, pp. 559-596.
19. Leach, W. D. (2004) Is devolution democratic? Assessing collaborative environmental management, Center for Collaborative Policy, California State University, Sacramento., Sacramento
20. Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W. and Sabatier, P. (2003) Stakeholder partnerships as an emergent form of collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. J. Policy Anal. Manage., 21, pp. 645-670.
21. Macfarlane, J. and Mayer., B. Evaluating environmental conflict resolution: Criteria identified in the literature, U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution., Tucson, AZ
22. McKinney, M. and Harmon., W. (2004) The Western confluence: A guide to governing natural resources, Island Press., Washington, DC
23. O'Leary, R. and Bingham, L. B. (2003) The promise and performance of environmental conflict resolution, Resources for the Future., Washington, DC
24. O'Leary, R. and Husar, M. (2002) What environmental and natural resource attorneys really think about alternative dispute resolution: A national survey. Nat. Resources Environ., 16, pp. 262-264.
25. O'Leary, R. and Raines, S. S. (2001) Lessons learned from two decades of alternative dispute resolution programs and processes at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Public Admin. Rev., 61, pp. 682-692.
26. (2001) Collaborative dispute resolution pilot project. Report to The Honorable Gene Derfler, Senate President, The Honorable Mark Simmons, House Speaker, and The Honorable Members of the Legislature, Salem, OR
27. (1999) The national marine fisheries service take reduction team negotiation process evaluation, National Marine Fisheries Service, Washington, DC
28. Sirianni, C. and Friedland, L. (2001) Civic innovation in America: Community empowerment, public policy, and the movement for civic renewal, University of California Press, Berkeley
29. Snow, D. (1997) The next West: Public lands, community, and the economy, pp. 181-203. Island Press, Washington, DC
30. Sturtevant, V. and Bryan, T. (2004) Commentary on environmental resistance to place-based collaboration. Society Nat. Resources, 17, pp. 455-460.
31. Susskind, L. and Cruikshank, J. (1987) Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to public disputes, Basic Books, New York
32. Susskind, L., McKearnan, S. and Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999) The consensus building handbook: A comprehensive guide to reaching agreement, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
33. Susskind, L., van der Wansem, M. and Ciccareli, A. (2003) Mediating land use disputes in the United States: Pros and cons. Environments, 31, pp. 65-83.
34. Taylor, M., Field, P. and Tilleman, W. (1999) Using mediation in Canadian environmental tribunals: Opportunities and best practices. Dalhousie Law Rev., 22, pp. 51-124.
35. Evaluating mediations and facilitations: A design document, Tucson, AZ
36. Walker, P. A. and Hurley, P. T. (2004) Collaboration derailed: The politics of community-based resource management in Nevada County. Society Nat. Resources, 17, pp. 735-751.
37. Weber, E. P. (2003) Bringing society back in grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
38. Welsh, M. M. (2004) Reaction of the national environmental groups to devolution. Society Nat. Resources, 17, pp. 293-304.
39. Wondolleck, J. M. and Ryan, C. M. (1999) What hat do I wear now? An examination of agency roles in collaborative processes. Negotiation J., 15, pp. 117-133.