Control, communication, and power: A study of the use of alternative dispute resolution of enforcement actions at the U.S. environmental protection agency

Negotiation Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 175-191

  Bourdeaux, Carolyn ^a   O'Leary, Rosemary ^a   Thornburgh, Richard ^b,c  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b US Forest Service   (United States)

^c Winsor Associates

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035643448     PISSN: 07484526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1013232226309     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abbot, H.W. 1990. The role of alternative dispute resolution in Superfund enforcement. William and Mary Journal of Environmental Law 15(1): 47-64.
2. Amy, D. 1987. The politics of environmental mediation. New York: Columbia University Press.
3. Anderson, F. 1985. Negotiation and informal agency action: The case of Superfund. Duke Law Journal 2: 261-280.
4. Blackburn, J.W. 1988. Environmental mediation as an alternative to litigation. Policy Studies Journal 16: 562-574.
5. Bingham, G. 1986. Resolving environmental disputes: A decade of experience. Washington: The Conservation Foundation.
6. Buckle, L. and S. Thomas-Buckle. 1986. Placing environmental mediation in context: Lessons from "failed mediations." Environmental Impact Assessment Review 6: 55-70.
7. Carpenter, S. and W.J.D. Kennedy. 1985. Managing environmental conflict by applying common sense. Negotiation Journal 1(2): 149-162.
8. Charla, L. and G. Parry. 1991. Mediation services: Successes and failures of site specific alternative dispute resolution. Villanova Environmental Law Journal II: 89-97.
9. Cooke, G. 1999. The reinvention of the EPA. Texas Lawyer, American Lawyer Newspaper Group, Inc., pp. 40.
10. Dean, J. 1998. Alternative dispute resolution appears: EPA offers ADR in Superfund cases. New York Law Journal 220(81): 53.
11. DeHaven-Smith, L. and J.R. Wodraska. 1996. Consensus building for integrated resources planning. Public Administration Review 56(4): 367-371.
12. Diamond, B. and W.A. White. 1993. Communications strategy for settlements with small volume waste contributors. Washington: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
13. Environmental Protection Agency. 1995. Use of alternative dispute resolution in enforcement actions. Environmental Reporter 26: 301-304.
14. Fiorino, D.J. 1988. Regulatory negotiation as a policy process. Public Administration Review 48(4): 764-772.
15. Fisher, R., W. Ury, and B. Patton. 1991. Getting to YES: Negotiating agreement without giving in. 2nd ed. New York: Penguin Books.
16. Folberg, J. and A. Taylor. 1988. Mediation: A comprehensive guide to resolving conflicts without litigation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Gaffney, F. and R. Loeffler. 1991. State sponsored environmental mediation: The Alaska Forest Practices Act review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 11: 311-331.
18. Gilbert, G.C. 1989. Alternative dispute resolution and Superfund: A research guide. Ecology Law Quarterly 16(3): 803-856.
19. Gusman, S. 1983. Selecting participants for a regulatory negotiation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 4: 195-202.
20. Honeyman, C. 1990. On evaluating mediators. Negotiation Journal 6(1): 23-36.
21. Hyatt, W. 1995. Taming the environmental litigation tiger. Journal of Environmental Regulation 5(1): 91-98.
22. Jenks, S. 1994. County compliance with North Carolina's solid waste mandate: A conflict-based model. Publius 24(2): 17-36.
23. Kakalik, James et al. 1997. An evaluation of mediation and early neutral evaluation under the Civil Justice Reform Act: A summary. Dispute Resolution Magazine (Summer): 4-7.
24. Katz, N. and J. Lawyer. 1983. Conflict management skills. The Phi Kappa Phi Journal LXIII(4): 31-33.
25. Kerwin, C. and L. Langbein. 1995. An evaluation of negotiated rulemaking at the Environmental Protection Agency, Phase I. Washington: The Administrative Conference of the United States.
26. Kriesberg, L. 1999. Conflict transformation. In Encyclopedia of Violence, Peace, and Conflict, edited by L. Kurtz and J. Turpin. San Diego: Academic Press.
27. Lan, Z. 1997. A conflict resolution approach to public administration. Public Administration Review 57(1): 27-35.
28. Louis, D. 1999. Challenges of multiparty environmental mediation. Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judges 19(1): 77-108.
29. McGovern, F. 1997. Beyond efficiency: A bevy of ADR justifications (An unfootnoted summary). Dispute Resolution Magazine, 3(4): 12-13.
30. Moore, S.A. 1996. Defining "successful" environmental dispute resolution: Case studies from public land planning in the United States. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16: 151.
31. Nader, L. 1995. Civilization and its negotiations. In Understanding disputes: The politics of argument, edited by P. Caplan. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
32. Nash, J. and L.E. Susskind. 1987. Mediating conflict over dioxin risks of resource recycling: Lessons from a flawed process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 7(1): 79-82..
33. O'Connor, D. 1978. Environmental mediation: The state of the art? Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 2: 9-17.
34. O'Leary, R. and S. Raines. 2001. Lessons learned from two decades of alternative dispute resolution programs and processes at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Public Administration Review, forthcoming.
35. Perritt, H.H., Jr. 1986. Negotiated rulemaking in practice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5(3): 482-495.
36. Peterson, L. 1992. The promise of mediated settlements of environmental disputes: The experience of EPA Region V. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 17: 327-380.
37. Ryan, M. 1997. Alternative dispute resolution in environmental cases: Friend or foe? Tulane Environmental Law Journal 10: 397-414.
38. Schneider, P. and E. Tohn. 1985. Success in negotiating environmental regulations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 5: 67-77.
39. Shelley, S. and S. Koyasako. 1998. Resolving environmental disputes without litigation. Chemical Engineering 105(5): 159.
40. Steenland, P. and P. Appel. 1996. Alternative dispute resolution symposium: The ongoing role of alternative dispute resolution in federal government litigation. University of Toledo Law Review 27(1): 805-820.
41. Stoll, R.G. 1991. Comprehensive environmental response, compensation and liability act. In Environmental Law Handbook. Rockville, Md: Government Institutes, Inc.
42. Susskind, L. 1985. Mediating public disputes. Negotiation Journal 1: 19-22.
43. Susskind, L., G. McMahon, and S. Rolley. 1987. Mediating development disputes. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 7: 127-138.
44. Waller, T. 1995. Knowledge, power and environmental policy: Expertise, the lay public, and water management in the western United States. Environmental Professional 17(2): 153-166.
45. Whitman, B.F. 1993. Alternative dispute resolution needed for Superfund remedies. Environmental Reporter 17: 1533-1537.
46. Wondolleck, J., N. Manring, and J. Crowfoot. 1996. Teetering at the top of the ladder: The experience of citizen group participants in alternative dispute resolution processes. Sociological Perspectives 39(2): 249-399.