메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 39-58

Mediating land use disputes in the United States: Pros and cons

Author keywords

Consensus building; Dispute resolution; Land use disputes; Land use planning; Mediation

Indexed keywords

DISPUTE RESOLUTION; LAND USE CONFLICT; LAND USE PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 0346934830     PISSN: 07116780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (17)

References (20)
  • 9
    • 0023523252 scopus 로고
    • Planning in the face of conflict: Negotiation and mediation strategies in local land use regulation
    • Forester, J. 1987. "Planning in the Face of Conflict: Negotiation and Mediation Strategies in Local Land Use Regulation." APA Journal 53(3): 303-313.
    • (1987) APA Journal , vol.53 , Issue.3 , pp. 303-313
    • Forester, J.1
  • 15
    • 0031786090 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An empirical analysis of environmental mediation
    • Sipe, N. 1998. "An Empirical Analysis of Environmental Mediation." APA Journal 64(3): 275-285.
    • (1998) APA Journal , vol.64 , Issue.3 , pp. 275-285
    • Sipe, N.1
  • 18
    • 0021576023 scopus 로고
    • Mediated negotiation in the public sector: The planner as mediator
    • Susskind, L., and C. Ozawa. 1984. "Mediated Negotiation in the Public Sector: The Planner as Mediator." Journal of Planning Education and Research 4(1): 5-14.
    • (1984) Journal of Planning Education and Research , vol.4 , Issue.1 , pp. 5-14
    • Susskind, L.1    Ozawa, C.2
  • 20
    • 0346427114 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Should agencies mediate their own disputes?
    • Tonkin, E., and P. Swanson. 1998. "Should Agencies Mediate Their Own Disputes?" Consensus 37: 2.
    • (1998) Consensus , vol.37 , pp. 2
    • Tonkin, E.1    Swanson, P.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.