Collaboration derailed: The politics of “community-based” resource management in nevada county

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 735-751

  Walker, Peter A ^a   Hurley, Patrick T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Community; Natural resource management; Political ecology; United states

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK;

CALIFORNIA; NEVADA COUNTY [CALIFORNIA]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4444231663     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920490480723     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Agrawal, A., and C. Gibson. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Dev. 27(4):629-649
2. Amy, D. 1987. The politics of environmental mediation. New York: Columbia University Press
3. Baland, J., and J. Platteau. 2000. Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities? New York: Oxford University Press
4. Berliner, H. 1970. A plague on the land. San Francisco, CA: California Tomorrow
5. Blaikie, P., and H. Brookfield, eds. 1987. Land degradation & society. London: Methuen
6. Brick, P., D. Snow, and S. Van de Wetering. 2001. Across the Great Divide. Washington, DC: Island Press
7. Coglianese, C. 1999. The limits of consensus. Environment 41(3):28(6)
8. Cohen, A. 1985. The symbolic construction of community. Chichester, UK: Tavistock
9. Conley, A., and M. Moote. 2003. Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society Nat. Resources 16(5):371-386
10. Creswell, J. 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
11. Dagget, D., J. Dusard, and Grand Canyon Trust. 1998. Beyond the rangeland conflict. Flagstaff, AZ: Good Stewards Project
12. Duane, T. 1997. Community participation in ecosystem management. Ecol. Law Q. 24(4): 771-797
13. Duane, T. 1996. Human settlement, 1850-2040. In Status of the Sierra Nevada, vol. 2, ed. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project. pp. 235-360. Davis: University of California
14. Duane, T. 1999. Shaping the Sierra. Berkeley: University of California
15. Few, R. 2001. Containment and counter-containment: Planner/community relations in conservation planning. Geograph J. 167(Part 2):111-124
16. Fontana, A., and J. Frey. 2000. The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed., ed. N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln. pp. 645-672. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
17. Gillingham, S. 2001. Social organization and participatory resource management in Brazilian ribeirinho communities: A case study of the Mamiraua Sustainable Development Reserve, Amazonas. Society Nat. Resources 14(9):803-814
18. Gupte, M. 2003. Reexamining participatory environmental policy: Social stratification and the gender dimension. Society Nat. Resources 16(4):327-334
19. Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, nature, and the geography of difference. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell
20. Hildyard, N., P. Hegde, P. Wolvekamp, and S. Reddy. 1998. Pluralism, participation and power. Forest Trees People 35:31-35
21. Hurley, P., and P. Walker. In press. Whose vision? The political ecology of land use planning in Nevada County, California. Environ. Plann. A
22. Janofsky, M. 2003. In towns that slowed growth, backlash stirs. New York Times. February 9, p. A14
23. Kellert, S., J. Mehta, S. Ebbin, and L. Lichtenfeld. 2000. Community natural resource management: Promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society Nat. Resources 13(8):705-715
24. Leach, M., R. Mearns, and I. Scoones. 1997. Community-based sustainable development-consensus or conflict. IDS Bull. Inst. Dev. Stud. 28(4):1-3
25. Margerum, R. 1999. Getting past yes-From capital creation to action. J. Am. Plan. Asso. 65(2):181-192
26. Mascarenhas, M., and R. Scarce. 2004. “The intention was good”: Legitimacy, consensus-based decision making, and the case of forest planning in British Columbia, Canada. Society Nat. Resources 17(1):17-38
27. McCarthy, J. 2003. Community-based forestry in the United States: Antecedents and new directions. Report to the Ford Foundation. State College: Pennsylvania State University
28. Nevada County. 2000. Natural Heritage 2020: Program Proposal. 9 May 2000.http://new. mynevadacounty.com/planning/
29. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
30. Paulson, D. 1998. Collaborative management of public rangeland in Wyoming: Lessons in co-management. Prof. Geogr. 50(3):301-315
31. Paulson, S., L. Gezon, and M. Watts. 2003. Locating the political in political ecology: An introduction. Hum. Org. 62(3):205-217
32. Peet, R., and M. Watts. 1996. Liberation ecologies. London: Routledge
33. Power, T., and R. Barrett. 2001. Post-cowboy economics. Washington, DC: Island Press
34. Ribot, J. 1996. Participation without representation: chiefs, councils, and forestry law in the West African Sahel. Cultural Survival Q. 30(3):40-44
35. Ribot, J. 2002. Democratic decentralization of natural resources. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute
36. Riebsame, W., and J. Robb. 1997. Atlas of the New West. New York: W.W. Norton
37. SBC (Sierra Business Council). 2001. SBC Outlines 2001-2002 Priorities. SBC News Spring: 1-4
38. SEDD (Sierra Economic Development District). 2001. Nevada County economic & fiscal indicator review. http://www.ncerc.org/demographics/2003%20EIR.pdf
39. Singleton, S. 2000. Cooperation or capture? The paradox of comanagement and community participation in natural resource management and environmental policymaking. Environ. Polit. 9(2):1-21
40. Singleton, S. 2002. Collaborative environmental planning in the American West: The good, the bad and the ugly. Environ. Polit. 11(3):54-75
41. SNEP. 1996. People and resources. In Status of the Sierra Nevada: Final report to Congress, ed. Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project. pp. 17-45. Davis: University of California
42. U.S. Census Bureau. 2003. Quick facts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/ 06057.html (last accessed 5 May 2003)
43. Walker, P., and L. Fortmann. 2003. Whose landscape? A political ecology of the “exurban” Sierra. Cultural Geographies 10(4):469-491
44. Walker, P., S. Marvin, and L. Fortmann. 2003. Landscape changes in Nevada County reflect social and ecological transitions. Calif Agric. 57(4):115-121
45. Western, D., R. Wright, and S. Strum. 1994. Natural connections. Washington, DC: Island Press
46. Wondolleck, J., and S. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work. Washington, DC: Island Press
47. Yaffee, S. 1996. Ecosystem management in the United States. Washington, DC: Island Press