Genre, medium, and learning to write: Negotiating identities, enacting school-based literacies in adulthood

Journal of College Reading and Learning

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 75-96

  Smith, Beatrice Quarshie ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46649095779     PISSN: 10790195     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10790195.2004.10850163     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bartholomae, D., (2001). Inventing the university. In E., Cushman, E., Kintgen, B. M., Kroll, & M., Rose (Eds.), Literacy:A critical sourcebook (pp. 511–524). Boston:Bedford/St Martins.
2. Bartholomae, D., & Petrosky, A., (1986). Facts, artifacts, and counterfacts:Theory and method for a reading and writing course. Upper Montclair, NJ:Boynton Cook.
3. Baumann, J. F., & Duffy-Hester, A. M., (2000). Making sense of classroom worlds:Methodology in teacher research. In M. L., Kamil, P. B., Mosenthal, P. D., Pearson, & R., Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research:Volume III (pp. 77–98). Mahwah, N.J.:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Bawarshi, A., (2000). The genre function. College English, 62, 335–359.
5. Bazerman, C., (1997). The life of genre, the life in the classroom. In W., Bishop & H., Ostrom (Eds.) Genre and writing:Issues, arguments, alternatives. (pp. 19–26). Portsmouth, NH:Boynton/Cook.
6. Brandt, D., (1995) Accumulating literacy:Writing and learning to write in the twentieth century. College English, 57, 649–668.
7. Bruce, B. C., (1997). Literacy and technologies:What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 20, 289–309.
8. Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H., (1978). Form and genre:Shaping rhetorical action. Falls Church, VA:Falls Church Speech Communication Association.
9. Carney-Crompton, S., & Tan, J., (2002). Support systems, psychological functioning, academic performance of nontraditional female students. Adult Education Quarterly, 52, 140–154.
10. Castells, M., (1998). End of millennium. Malden, MA:Blackwell.
11. Christie, F., (1988). Genre as choice. In I., Reid (Ed.), The place of genre in learning:Current debates (pp.22–34). Geelong Victoria:Deakin University.
12. Clark, R., & Ivanic, R., (1997). The politics of writing. New York:Routledge.
13. Coe, R., (1994). Teaching genre as process. In A., Freedman & P., Medway (Eds.), Learning and teaching genre (pp. 157–69). Portsmouth, NH:Boynton/Cook.
14. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M., (1993). The powers of literacy:A genre approach to teaching writing. Pittsburgh, PA:University of Pittsburgh Press.
15. Devitt, A. J., (1993). Generalizing about genre:New conceptions of an old concept. College Composition and Communication, 44, 573–586.
16. Dias, P., (1994). Initiating students into the genres of discipline-based reading and writing. In A., Freedman & P., Medway (Eds.), Learning and teaching genre (pp.193–206). Portsmouth, NH:Boynton/Cook.
17. Duffelmeyer, B. D., (2002). Critical computer literacy:Computers in first-year composition as topic and environment. Computers and Composition:An International Journal for Teachers of Writing Online. 1–18. Retrieved May 20, 2002, from http://corax.cwrl.utexas.edu/cac/Current_Issue/dufflemeyer.html.
18. Ford, M.A., & Arney, S., (2001). Bloomington-Normal population tops 110,000. The Pantograph. (p.A2).
19. Freedman, A., & Medway, P., (Eds.). (1994). Learning and teaching genre. Portsmouth, NH:Boynton/Cook.
20. Halliday, M. A. K., (1978). Language as social semiotic:The social interpretation of language and meaning. London:Arnold.
21. Harris, J., (1989). The idea of community in the study of writing. College Composition and Communication, 40, 11–22.
22. Herideen, P. E., (1998). Policy, pedagogy, and social inequality:Community college students in post-industrial America. Westport, CT:Bergin and Garvey.
23. Hesford, W. S., (1999). Framing identities:Autobiography and the politics of pedagogy. Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
24. Kellner, D., (2000). New technologies/new literacies:Reconstructing education for the new millennium. Teacher Education, 11, 245–265.
25. Kress, G., (1988). Genre in a social theory of language:A reply to John Dixon. In I., Reid (Ed.), The place of genre in learning:Current debates (pp. 35–45). Geelong Victoria:Deakin University.
26. Larson, D., & Brady, M. E., (1999). Learning stories of our own. Adult Learning, 11, 13–15.
27. Latour, B., (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J., Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters:Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 103–131). New York:Routledge.
28. Luke, C., (2000). Cyber-schooling and technological change:Multiliteracies for new times. In B., Cope & M., Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies:Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp.69–91). London:Routledge.
29. Lytle, S. L., (2001). Living literacy:Rethinking development in adulthood. In E., Cushman, E., Kintgen, B. M., Kroll, & M., Rose (Eds.), Literacy:A critical sourcebook (pp.376–401). Boston:Bedford/St Martins.
30. Miller, C. R., (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167.
31. Miller, R. E., (1998). Arts of complicity. College English, 61, 10–28.
32. Padron, E. J., (1994). Hispanics and community colleges. In G., Baker III. (Ed.), A handbook on the community college in America (pp. 82–93). Westport, CT:Greenwood Press.
33. Phillippe, K. A., (1995). National profile of community colleges:Trends and statistics. Washington, DC:American Association of Community Colleges.
34. Quarshie Smith, B., & Watson, L., (2000). The changing nature of work in community colleges:Rethinking faculty workload and student learning. Planning and Changing, 31, 95–106.
35. Russell, D. R., (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society:An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504–554.
36. Scott, J. W., (1998). Experience. In S., Smith & J., Waston (Eds.), Women, autobiography, theory:A reader (pp.57–71). Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin Press.
37. Selfe, C. L., (1999). Technology and literacy in the twenty-first century. Carbondale, IL:Southern Illinois University Press.
38. Selfe, C. L., & Hilligoss, S., (Eds.). (1994). Literacy and computers. New York:Modern Language Association of America.
39. Smith, R., (1995). Tomorrow's community college. Princeton, NJ:Life Press.
40. Stygall, G., (1994). Resisting privilege:Basic writing and Foucault's author function. College Composition and Communication, 45, 320–341.
41. Swales, J., (1990). Genre analysis:English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
42. Tuman, M. C., (Ed). (1992). Literacy online:The promise (and peril) of reading and writing with computers. Pittsburgh, PA:University of Pittsburgh Press.
43. Yorks, L., & Kasl, E., (2002). Toward a theory and practice for whole-person learning:Reconceptualizing experience and the role of affect. Adult Education Quarterly, 52, 176–192.