Comparing three modes of instruction in a graduate social work program

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 157-172

  York, Reginald O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 46449086753     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5175/JSWE.2008.200700031     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Coe, J., & Elliott, D. (1999). An evaluation of teaching direct practice courses in a distance education program for rural settings. Journal of Social Work Education, 35,353-365.
2. Dutton, J., Dutton, M., & Perry, J. (2001). Do online students perform as well as lecture students?Journal of Engineering Education, 90,131-136.
3. Faux, T. L., & Black-Hughes, C. (2000). A comparison of using the internet versus lectures to teach social work history. Research on Social Work Practice, 10,454-466.
4. Frey, A., Faul, A., & Yankelov, P. (2003). Student perceptions of Web-assisted teaching strategies. Journal of Social Work Education, 39, 443-458.
5. Gold, L., & Maitland, C. (1999). What's the difference? Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved March 5, 2007, from www.ihep.org
6. Harrington, D. (1999). Teaching statistics: A comparison of traditional classroom and programmed instruction/distance learning approaches. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 343-352.
7. Kreuger, L. W., & Stretch, J. J. (2000). How hypermodern technology in social work education bites back. Journal of Social Work Education, 36,103-114.
8. LaRose, R., Gregg, J. & Easton, M. (1998). Audiographic telecourses for the Web: An experiment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication,4(2).
9. Nesler, M. S., Hanner, M. B., & Melburg, V., & McGowan, S. (2001). Professional socialization of baccalaureate nursing students: Can students in distance nursing programs become socialized?Journal of Nursing Education, 40,293-302.
10. Ocker, R. J., & Yaverbaum, G. J. (2001). Collaborative learning in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12,427-446.
11. Petracchi, H. E., & Patchner, M. A. (2000). Social work students and their learning environment: A comparison of interactive television, face-to-face instruction, and the traditional classroom. Journal of Social Work Education, 36,335-346.
12. Poe, M., & Stassen, M. L. A. (nd). Teaching and learning online: Communication, community, and assessment. A handbook for UMass faculty. Amherst: Center or Teaching, Office of Academic Planning, University of Massachusetts.
13. Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon as reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers.Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
14. Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2003). Differences between traditional and distance education academic performance: A meta-analytic approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 42. Retrieved March 5, 2007, from www.irrodl.org
15. Schoech, D., & Helton, D. (2002). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of a course taught via classroom and internet chatroom. Qualitative Social Work, 1,111-124.
16. Sullivan, P. (2001). Gender differences and the online classroom: Male and female college students evaluate their experiences. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25,805-818.
17. Thyer, B. A., Polk, G., & Gaudin, J. G. (1997). Distance learning in social work education: A preliminary evaluation. Journal of Social Work Education, 33,363-367.
18. Wilke, D., & Vinton, L. (2006). Evaluation of the first Web-based advanced standing MSW program. Journal of Social Work Education, 42,607-620.
19. Wilson, S. (1999). Invited commentary: Distance education and accreditation. Journal of Social Work Education, 35,326-330.
20. Wolfson, G. K., Marson, G. & Magnuson, C. W. (2005). Changing the nature of the discourse: Teaching field seminars online. Journal of Social Work Education, 41, 355-361.