Student perceptions of web-assisted teaching strategies

Journal of Social Work Education

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 443-457

  Frey, Andy ^a   Faul, Annajtie ^a   Yankelov, Pamela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344197670     PISSN: 10437797     EISSN: 21635811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2003.10779148     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bonwell, C., & Hurd, P. (1998, March). VARK and active learning: A learning styles starter kit. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Higher Education, Atlanta, GA.
2. Cauble, E. A., & Thurston, L. P. (2000). Effects of interactive multimedia training on knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy of social work students. Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 428-437.
3. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
4. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
5. Faul, A., & Frey, A. J. (in press). The effects of web-assisted instruction in a social work research methods course. Social Work Education.
6. Finn, J. (1995). Use of electronic mail to promote computer literacy in social work undergraduates. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 12(1/2), 73-83.
7. Fleming, N. D., & Bonwell, C. C. (2002). VARK (Version .1) [Questionnaire]. Available from www.vark-learn.com
8. Flynn, J. P. (1990). Using the computer to teach and learn social policy: A report from the classroom and the field. Computers in Human Services, 7(3-4), 199-209.
9. Lloyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. P. (1984). Reliability and factorial validity of computer attitude scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 44, 501-505.
10. Maki, R. H., Maki, W. S., Patterson, M., & Whittaker, P. D. (2000). Evaluation of a web-based introductory psychology course: I. Learning and satisfaction in online versus lecture courses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 230-239.
11. Petracchi, H. E. (2000). Distance education: What do our students tell us? Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 362-376.
12. Polloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom. The realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13. Siegel, E., Jennings, J. G., Conklin, J., & Flynn, S. A. N. (1998). Distance learning in social work education: Results and implications of a national survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 71-80.
14. SPSS, Inc. (2001). SPSS Base 11.0: Users guide [Computer software and manual]. Chicago: Author.
15. Stocks, J. T., & Freddolino, P. P. (1998). Evaluation of a world wide web-based graduate social work research methods course. Computers in Human Services, 15(2/3), 51-69.
16. Stocks, J. T., & Freddolino, P. P. (2000). Enhancing computer-mediated teaching through interactivity: The second iteration of a worldwide web-based graduate social work course. Research on Social Work Practice, 10, 505-518.
17. Svanum, S., Chen, S. H. A., & Bublitz, S. (1997). Internet-based instruction of the principles of base rate and prediction: A demonstration project. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29(2), 228-231.
18. Thurston, L. P., Denning, J., & Verschelden, C. (1996). Using interactive multimedia to address rural social work education needs. In E. T. Reck (Ed.), Tulane studies in social welfare (pp. 28-39). New Orleans, LA: Tulane School of Social Work.
19. Van Dusen, G. C. (1998). Technology: Higher education's magic bullet. Retrieved June 12, 2002, from http://www.nea.org/he/heta98/s98pg59.pd