Adrenaline recognition in water

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 17, 2004, Pages 4225-4232

  Molt, Oliver ^a   Rübeling, Daniel ^a   Schäfer, Gerhard ^a   Schrader, Thomas ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adrenergic receptor; Beta blockers; Hydrophobic effect; Molecular recognition; Monolayers

Indexed keywords

AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; HYDROGEN BONDS; HYDROPHOBICITY; MICELLES;

AROMATIC FLANKS; CATECHOLAMINES; CRITICAL MICELL CONCENTRATION (CMC);

WATER;

ADRENALIN; ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR; ALPRENOLOL; AMMONIUM DERIVATIVE; AROMATIC COMPOUND; ATENOLOL; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CATECHOLAMINE; DOPAMINE; HYDROXYL GROUP; NORADRENALIN; PHOSPHONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PROPRANOLOL; WATER;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING KINETICS; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; DRUG STRUCTURE; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHILICITY; LIPID MONOLAYER; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MICELLE; MICROENVIRONMENT; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ADRENERGIC BETA-ANTAGONISTS; CATECHOLAMINES; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; EPINEPHRINE; HYDROGEN BONDING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MICELLES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; RECEPTORS, ADRENERGIC; WATER;

EID: 4644268734     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200400100     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. T. P. Iismaa, T. J. Biden, J. Shine, G Protein-Coupled Receptors, Springer, Heidelberg, 1995.
2. Recent GPCR crystal structures: D. Doyle, J. M. Cabral, R. A. Pfuetzner, A. Kuo, J. M. Gulbis, S. L. Cohen, B. T. Chait, R. Mackinnon, Science 1998, 280, 69; K. Palczewski, T. Kumasaka, T. Hori, C. A. Behnke, H. Moloshima, B. A. Fox, I. Le Trong, D. C. Teller, T. Okada, R. O. Stenkamp, M. Yamamota, M Miyano, Science 2000, 289, 739-745; R. E. Stenkamp, S. Filipek, C. A. G. G. Driessen, D. C. Teller, K. Palczewski. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1565, 168.
3. Recent GPCR crystal structures: D. Doyle, J. M. Cabral, R. A. Pfuetzner, A. Kuo, J. M. Gulbis, S. L. Cohen, B. T. Chait, R. Mackinnon, Science 1998, 280, 69; K. Palczewski, T. Kumasaka, T. Hori, C. A. Behnke, H. Moloshima, B. A. Fox, I. Le Trong, D. C. Teller, T. Okada, R. O. Stenkamp, M. Yamamota, M Miyano, Science 2000, 289, 739-745; R. E. Stenkamp, S. Filipek, C. A. G. G. Driessen, D. C. Teller, K. Palczewski. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1565, 168.
4. Recent GPCR crystal structures: D. Doyle, J. M. Cabral, R. A. Pfuetzner, A. Kuo, J. M. Gulbis, S. L. Cohen, B. T. Chait, R. Mackinnon, Science 1998, 280, 69; K. Palczewski, T. Kumasaka, T. Hori, C. A. Behnke, H. Moloshima, B. A. Fox, I. Le Trong, D. C. Teller, T. Okada, R. O. Stenkamp, M. Yamamota, M Miyano, Science 2000, 289, 739-745; R. E. Stenkamp, S. Filipek, C. A. G. G. Driessen, D. C. Teller, K. Palczewski. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1565, 168.
5. S. Trumpp-Kallmeyer, J. Hotlack, A. Bruinfels, M. Hibert, J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 3448; K. Wieland, H. M. Zuurmond, C. Krasel, A. P. Ijzerman, M. J. Lohse, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 9276.
6. S. Trumpp-Kallmeyer, J. Hotlack, A. Bruinfels, M. Hibert, J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 3448; K. Wieland, H. M. Zuurmond, C. Krasel, A. P. Ijzerman, M. J. Lohse, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 9276.
7. M. Lahav, A. N. Shipway, I. Willner, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 1925.
8. S. M. Strawbridge, S. J. Green, J. H. R. Tucker, Chem. Commun. 2000, 2393-2394;
9. b) S. M. Straw-bridge, S. J. Green, J. H. R. Tucker, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2, 2393-2394.
10. L. Lamarque, P. Navarro, C. Miranda, V. J. Arán, C. Ochoa, F. Escarti, E. García-España, J. Latorre, S. V. Luis, J. F. Miravet, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10560-10570.
11. C. Mannironi, A. Di Nardo, P. Fruscoloni, G. P. Tocchini-Valentini, Biochemistry 1997, 36, 9726.
12. D. R. Shankaran, M.-S. Won, Y.-B. Shim. Anal. Sci. 2001, 17, 9; M. Del Pilar Taboada Sotomayor, A. A. Tanaka, L. T. Kubota, Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 455, 215.
13. D. R. Shankaran, M.-S. Won, Y.-B. Shim. Anal. Sci. 2001, 17, 9; M. Del Pilar Taboada Sotomayor, A. A. Tanaka, L. T. Kubota, Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 455, 215.
14. T. Schrader, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 2816-2818; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 2649-2651; T. Schrader, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 264-272.
15. T. Schrader, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 2816-2818; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 2649-2651; T. Schrader, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 264-272.
16. T. Schrader, Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 2816-2818; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 2649-2651; T. Schrader, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 264-272.
17. T. Schrader, M. Herm, Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 47-53.
18. T. Schrader, M. Herm, O. Molt, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 3244-3248; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3148-3151; T. Schrader, M. Herm, O. Molt, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1485-1499.
19. T. Schrader, M. Herm, O. Molt, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 3244-3248; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3148-3151; T. Schrader, M. Herm, O. Molt, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1485-1499.
20. T. Schrader, M. Herm, O. Molt, Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 3244-3248; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3148-3151; T. Schrader, M. Herm, O. Molt, Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1485-1499.
21. T. Schrader, T. Grawe, G. Schäfer, Org. Lett 2003, 5, 1641-1644.
22. Sugar binding proteins: F. A. Quiocho, Pure Appl. Chem. 1989, 61, 1293; N. Sharon. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1993, 18, 221;
23. Sugar binding proteins: F. A. Quiocho, Pure Appl. Chem. 1989, 61, 1293; N. Sharon. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1993, 18, 221;
24. + recognition in the Rossman fold: M. Otagiri, G. Kurisu, S. Ui, Y. Takusagawa, M. Ohkuma, T. Kudo, M. Kusunoki, J. Biochem. 2001, 129, 205-208.
25. + recognition in the Rossman fold: M. Otagiri, G. Kurisu, S. Ui, Y. Takusagawa, M. Ohkuma, T. Kudo, M. Kusunoki, J. Biochem. 2001, 129, 205-208.
26. a) T. Kawase, Y. Seirai, H. R. Darabi, M. Oda, Y. Sarakai, K. Tashiro, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 1659-1662; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1621-1624;
27. a) T. Kawase, Y. Seirai, H. R. Darabi, M. Oda, Y. Sarakai, K. Tashiro, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 1659-1662; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1621-1624;
28. b) M. M. Haley, J. J. Pak, S. C. Brand, Top. Curr. Chem. 1999, 201, 82-130.
29. Catechole recognition by phosphonates: G. Das, A. D. Hamilton, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 11139; C. E. Park, Y-G. Jung, J.-I. Hong. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2353.
30. Catechole recognition by phosphonates: G. Das, A. D. Hamilton, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 11139; C. E. Park, Y-G. Jung, J.-I. Hong. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2353.
31. x, water. Solvents are treated as an analytical continuum starting near the van der Waals surface of the solute (GB SA model: W. C. Still, A. Tempczyk, R. C. Hawley, T. Hendrickson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 6127-6129).
32. Restricted mobility of a guest inside a very tight host macrocycle severely lowers its entropy content, thus good artificial hosts offer enough space for some rotatory freedom of the bound guest.
33. S. Takahashi, Y. Kuroyama, K. Sonogashira, N. Hagihara. Synthesis 1980, 627-630.
34. A. Ostrowicki, E. Koepp, F. Vögtle, Top. Curr. Chem. 1992, 161, 37-67.
35. a) R. Karaman. A. Goldhlum, E. Breuer, H. Leader, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1989, 765;
36. b) E. Breuer, M. Satadi, M. Chorev, D. Gibson, J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 6147.
37. a) P. Job. Compt. Rend. 1925, 180, 928;
38. b) M. T. Blanda, J. H. Horner, M. Newcomb, J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 4626.
39. 1H NMR signal. This dilution-induced uncertainty represents a fraction of the observed CIS of less than 1% in the worst case. Thus, it is safe to say, that dilution effects are negligible for the NMR titrations within this study.
40. Many earlier studies, for example, by Schneider or Diederich et al., show the expected smooth in- and decrease with the solvent composition: H.-J. Schneider. Angew. Chem. 1991, 103, 1419-1439; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1417-1436; U. Meyer, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1976, 21, 159.
41. Many earlier studies, for example, by Schneider or Diederich et al., show the expected smooth in- and decrease with the solvent composition: H.-J. Schneider. Angew. Chem. 1991, 103, 1419-1439; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1417-1436; U. Meyer, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1976, 21, 159.
42. Many earlier studies, for example, by Schneider or Diederich et al., show the expected smooth in- and decrease with the solvent composition: H.-J. Schneider. Angew. Chem. 1991, 103, 1419-1439; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1417-1436; U. Meyer, Coord. Chem. Rev. 1976, 21, 159.
43. a) S. Shinkai, S. Mori, H. Koreishi, T. Tsubaki, O. Manabe, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2409;
44. b) Y. Murakami, J. Kikuchi, T. Ohno, O. Hayashida, M. Kojima, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7672.
45. H. Mo, T. C. Pochapsky, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1997, 33, 1. In most artificial complexes the NOEs are either weak or negative.
46. We thank Dr. Stefan Kubik, Düsseldorf, for providing us the evaluation software to calculate the degree of complexation in 1:1 versus 2:1 complexes.
47. see ref. [4-8]. Other efficient catecholamine binders: J.-P. Behr. J.-M. Lehn, P. Vierling. Helv. Chim. Acta 1982, 65, 1853-1867; B. Escuder, A. E. Rowan, M. C. Feiters, R. J. M. Nolte, Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 291-300.
48. see ref. [4-8]. Other efficient catecholamine binders: J.-P. Behr. J.-M. Lehn, P. Vierling. Helv. Chim. Acta 1982, 65, 1853-1867; B. Escuder, A. E. Rowan, M. C. Feiters, R. J. M. Nolte, Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 291-300.
49. These groups are present in the catechole and amino alcohol hydroxyls, as well as in tryptophane's pyrrol. They are all fully protonated at neutral pH.
50. For experimental details, see Supporting Information.
51. a) M. Higuchi, T. Koga, K. Taguchi, T. Kinoshita, Langmuir 2002. 18, 813;
52. b) D. Y. Sasaki, T. A. Waggoner, J. A. Last, T. M. Alam, Langmuir 2002, 18, 3714;
53. c) J. Lahiri, G. D. Fate, S. B. Ungashe, J. T. Groves, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2347.
54. J. Meunier, Colloids Surf. A 2000, 171, 33.
55. C. Lavoie, J.-F. Mercier, A. Salahpour, D. Umapathy, A. Breit, L.-R. Villeneuve, W.-Z. Zhu, R.-P. Xiao, E. G. Lakatta, M. Bouvier, T. E. Hebert, J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 35402; J. Xu, M. Paquet, A. C. Lau, J. D. Wood, C. A. Ross, R. A. Hall, J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 41310.
56. C. Lavoie, J.-F. Mercier, A. Salahpour, D. Umapathy, A. Breit, L.-R. Villeneuve, W.-Z. Zhu, R.-P. Xiao, E. G. Lakatta, M. Bouvier, T. E. Hebert, J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 35402; J. Xu, M. Paquet, A. C. Lau, J. D. Wood, C. A. Ross, R. A. Hall, J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 41310.
57. Synthetic receptors have also been incorporated into self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiols on gold (SAM's) and displayed high selectivities in molecular recognition of various guests dissolved in organic solvents: K. Motesharei, D. C. Myles, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7328-7336.
58. -6 M see ref. [4-8].
59. A simple lipid-modified bisphosphonate embedded in the stearic acid monolayer did not produce any changes in the p/A diagram even at high guest concentrations in the aqueous subphase.
60. A. N. Shipway, E. Katz, I. Willner, ChemPhysChem 2000, 1, 18.