Sentiment analysis in multiple languages: Feature selection for opinion classification in Web forums

ACM Transactions on Information Systems

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2008, Pages

  Abbasi, Ahmed ^a   Chen, Hsinchun ^a   Salem, Arab ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Feature selection; Opinion mining; Sentiment analysis; Text classification

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARK DATASET; DATA SETS; ENHANCED PERFORMANCE; EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION; EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS; FEATURE SELECTION (FS); FEATURE SELECTION METHODS; HIGH PERFORMANCE; HYBRIDIZED GENETIC ALGORITHM; MOVIE REVIEW; MULTIPLE LANGUAGES; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; SENTIMENT CLASSIFICATION; SYNTACTIC FEATURES; TEST-BEDS; WEB FORUMS;

ALGORITHMS; BOOLEAN FUNCTIONS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); EXTRACTION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; HEURISTIC ALGORITHMS; HEURISTIC PROGRAMMING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; LINGUISTICS;

FEATURE EXTRACTION;

EID: 46249095180     PISSN: 10468188     EISSN: 15582868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1361684.1361685     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. ABBASI, A. AND CHEN, H. 2005. Identification and comparison of extremist-group Web forum messages using authorship analysis. IEEE Intely. Syst. 20, 5, 67-75.
2. ABBASI, A. AND CHEN, H. 2006. Visualizing authorship for identification. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, San Diego, CA, 60-71.
3. ABBASI, A. AND CHEN, H. 2007a. Affect intensity analysis of Dark Web forums. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, New Brunswick, NJ, 282-288.
4. ABBASI, A. AND CHEN, H. 2007b. Analysis of affect intensities in extremist group forums. In Intelligence and Security Informatics. E. Reid and H. Chen, Eds. Springer (forthcoming).
5. ALEXOUDA, G. AND PAPPARRIZOS, K. 2001. A genetic algorithm approach to the product line design problem using the seller's return criterion: An extensive comparative computational study. Eur: J. Oper. Res. 134, 165-178.
6. AGGARWAL, C. C., ORLIN, J., AND TAI, R. P. 1997. Optimized crossover for the independent set problem. Oper. Res. 45, 2,226-234.
7. AGRAWAL, R., RAJAGOPALAN, S., SRIKANT, R., AND XU, Y. 2003. Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. In Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 529-535.
8. BALAI RISHNAN, P. V., GUPTA, R., AND JACOB, V. S. 2004. Development of hybrid genetic algorithms for product line designs. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 34, 1, 468-483.
9. BEINEKE, P., HASTIE, T., AND VAITHYANATHAN, S. 2004. The sentimental factor: Improving review classification via human-provided information. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 263.
10. BURRIS, V., SMITH, E., AND STRAHM, A. 2000. White supremacist networks on the Internet. Sociol. Focus 33, 2, 215-235.
11. CHEN, A. AND GEY, F. 2002. Building an Arabic stemmer for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 11th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC), Gaithersburg, MD, 631-639.
12. CHEN, H. 2006. Intelligence and Security Informatics for International Security: Information Sharing and Data Mining. Springer, London.
13. CRILLEY, K. 2001. Information warfare: New battle fields, terrorists, propaganda, and the Internet. Aslib Proc. 53, 7, 250-264.
14. DASH, M. AND LIU, H. 1997. Feature selection for classification. Intell. Data Anal. 1, 131-156.
15. DAVE, K., LAWRENCE, S., AND PENNOCK, D. M. 2003. Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW), 519-528.
16. DE VEL, O., ANDERSON, A., CORNEY, M., AND MOHAY, G. 2001. Mining e-mail content for author identification forensics. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 30, 4, 55-64.
17. DONATH, J. 1999. Identity and deception in the virtual community. In Communities in Cyberspace, Routledge Press, London.
18. EFRON, M. 2004. Cultural orientations: Classifying subjective documents by cocitation analysis. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium. Series on Style and Meaning in Language, Art, Music, and Design, 41-48.
19. EFRON, M., MARCHIONINI, G., AND ZHIANG, J. 2004. Implications of the recursive representation problem for automatic concept identification in on-line government information. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST) SIG-CR Workshop.
20. FEI, Z., LIU, J., AND WU, G. 2004. Sentiment classification using phrase patterns. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Computer Information Technology, 1147-1152.
21. FORMAN, G. 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1289-1305.
22. GAMON, M. 2004. Sentiment classification on customer feedback data: Noisy data, large feature vectors, and the role of linguistic analysis. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 841.
23. GLASER, J., DIXIT, J., AND GREEN, D. P. 2002. Studying hate crime with the Internet: What makes racists advocate racial violence? J. Social Issues 58, 1, 177-193.
24. GREFENSTETTE, G.., QU, Y., SHANAHAN, J. G., AND EVANS, D. A. 2004. Coupling niche browsers and affect analysis for an opinion mining application. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference Recherche d'Information Assistee par Ordinateur, 186-194.
25. GUYON, I., WESTON, J., BARNHILL, S., AND VAPNIK, V. 2002. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach. Learn. 46, 389-422.
26. GUYON, I. AND ELISSEEFF, A. 2003. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3,1157-1182.
27. HATZIVASSILOGLOU, V. AND MCKEOWN, K. R. 1997. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, 174-181.
28. HEARST, M. A. 1992. Direction-Based text interpretation as an information access refinement. In Text-Based Intelligent Systems: Current Research and Practice in Information Extraction and Retrieval, P. Jacobs, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
29. HENLEY, N. M., MILLER, M. D., BEAZLEY, J. A., NGUYEN, D. N., KAMINSKY, D., AND SANDERS, R. 2002. Frequency and specificity of referents to violence in news reports of anti-gay attacks. Discourse Soc. 13, 1, 75-104.
30. HERRING, S., JOB-SLUDER, K., SCRRCKLER, R., AND BARAB, S. 2002. Searching for safety online: Managing "trolling" in a feminist forum. The Inf. Soc. 18, 5, 371-384.
31. HERRING, S. AND PAOLILLO, J. C. 2006. Gender and genre variations in Weblogs. J. Sociolinguist. 10, 4, 439.
32. HOLLAND, J. 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
33. HU, M. AND LIU, B. 2004. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 168-177.
34. JAIN, A. AND ZONGKER, D. 1997. Feature selection: Evaluation, application, and small sample performance. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19, 2, 153-158.
35. JIANG, M., JENSEN, E., BEITZEL, S. AND ARGAMON, S. 2004. Choosing the right bigrams for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Meeting of the International Federation of Classification Societies.
36. JUOLA, P. AND BAAYEN, H. 2005. A controlled-corpus experiment in authorship identification by cross-entropy. Literat. Linguist. Comput. 20, 59-67.
37. KANAYAMA, H., NASUKAWA, T., AND WATANABE, H. 2004. Deeper sentiment analysis using machine translation technology. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 494-500.
38. KAPLAN, J. AND WEINBERG, L. 1998. The Emergence of a Euro-American Radical Right., Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
39. KIM, S. AND HOVY, E. 2004. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, 1367-1373.
40. KTELL, B. WOODS, W. A., AND FRIEDER, O. 1994. Discrimination of authorship using visualization. Inf. Process. Manage. 30, 1, 141-150.
41. KOPPEL, M., ARGAMON, S., AND SHIMONI, A. R. 2002. Automatically categorizing written texts by author gender. Literar. Linguis. Comput. 17, 4, 401-412.
42. KOPPEL, M. AND SCHLER, J. 2003. Exploiting stylistic idiosyncrasies for authorship attribution. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Computational Approaches to Style Analysis and Synthesis, Acapulco, Mexico.
43. LEVINE, D. 1996. Application of a hybrid genetic algorithm to airline crew scheduling. Comput. Oper. Res. 23, 6, 547-558.
44. LEETS, L. 2001. Responses to Internet hate sites: Is speech too free in cyberspace? Commun. Law Policy 6, 2, 287-317.
45. LI, J., ZHENG, R., AND CHEN, H. 2006. From fingerprint to writeprint. Commun. ACM 49, 4, 76-82.
46. LI, J., SU, H., CHEN, H., AND FUTSCHER, B. 2007. Optimal search-based gene subset selection for gene array cancer classification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed (to appear).
47. LIU, B., HU, M., AND CHENG, J. 2005. Opinion observer: Analyzing and comparing opinions on the Web. In Proceedings of the 14th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 342-351.
48. MARTIN, J. R. AND WHITE, P. R. R. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave, London.
49. MISHNE, G. 2005. Experiments with mood classification. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Stylistic Analysis of Text for Information Access, Salvador, Brazil.
50. MITRA, M., BUCKLEY, C., SINGHAL, A., AND CARDIE, C. 1997. An analysis of statistical and syntactic phrases. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference Recherche d'Information Assistee par Ordinateur, Montreal, Canada, 200-214.
51. MLADENIC, D., BRANK, J., GROBELNIK, M., AND MILIC-FRAYLING, N. 2004. Feature selection using linear classifier weights: Interaction with classification models. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Sheffield, UK, 234-241.
52. MORINAGA, S., YAMANISHI, K., TATEISHI, K., AND FUKUSHIMA, T. 2002. Mining product reputations on the Web. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Edmonton, Canada, 341-349.
53. MULLEN, T. AND COLLIER, N. 2004. Sentiment analysis using support vector machines with diverse information sources. In Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 412-418.
54. NASUKAWA, T. AND YI, J. 2003. Sentiment analysis: Capturing favorability using natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture, Sanibel Island, FL, 70-77.
55. NIGAM, K. AND HURST, M. 2004. Towards a robust metric of opinion. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text.
56. NG, V., DASGUPTA, S., AND ARIFIN, S. M. N. 2006. Examining the role of linguistic knowledge sources in the automatic identification and classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL Conference. Sydney, Australia, 611-618.
57. OLIVEIRA, L. S., SABOURIN, R., BORTOLOZZI, F., AND SUEN, C. Y. 2002. Feature selection using multi-objective genetic algorithms for handwritten digit recognition. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 568-571.
58. PANG, B., LEE, L., AND VAITHYANATHAIN, S. 2002. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 79-86.
59. PANG, B. AND LEE, L. 2004. A sentimental education: Sentimental analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 271-278.
60. PICARD, R. W. 1997. Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
61. PLATT, J. 1999. Fast training on SVMs using sequential minimal optimization. In Advances in Kernel Methods: Support Vector Learning. B. Scholkopf et al. Eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 185-208.
62. QUINLAN, J. R. 1986. Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1, 1, 81-106.
63. RILOFF, E., PATWARDHAN, S., AND WIEBE, J. 2006. Feature subsumption for opinion analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Sydney, Australia, 440-448.
64. RILOFF, E., WIEBE, J., AND WILSON, T. 2003. Learning subjective nouns using extraction pattern bootstrapping. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Natural Language Learning, Edmonton, Canada, 25-32.
65. ROBINSON, L. 2005. Debating the events of September 11th: Discursive and interactional dynamics in three online for a. J Comput. Mediat. Commun. 10, 4.
66. SCHAFER, J. 2002. Spinning the web of hate: Web-based hate propagation by extremist organizations. J. Criminal Just. Popular Culture 9, 2, 69-88.
67. SCHLER, J., KOPPEL, M., ARGAMON, S., AND PENNEBAKER, J. 2006. Effects of age and gender on blogging. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs, Menlo Park, CA, 191-197.
68. SEBASTIANI, F. 2002. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput. Surv. 34, 1, 1-47.
69. SHANNON, C. E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 4, 379-423.
70. SIEDLECKI, W. AND SKLANSKY, J. 1989. Anote on genetic algorithms for large-scale feature selection. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 10, 5, 335-347.
71. SUBASIC, P. AND HUETTNER, A. 2001. Affect analysis of text using fuzzy semantic typing. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 9, 4, 483-496.
72. TONG, R. 2001. An operational system for detecting and tracking opinions in on-line discussion. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Workshop on Operational Text Classification, 1-6.
73. TURNEY, P. D. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meetings of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Philadelphia, PA, 417-424.
74. TURNEY, P. D. AND LITTMAN, M. L. 2003. Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 21, 4, 315-346.
75. VAFAIE, H. AND IMAM, I. F. 1994. Feature selection methods: Genetic algorithms vs. greedy-like search. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Fuzzy and Intelligent Control Systems.
76. VIEGAS, F. B. AND SMITH, M. 2004. Newsgroup crowds and AuthorLines: Visualizing the activity of individuals in conversational cyberspaces. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.
77. WHITELAW, C., GARG, N., AND ARGAMON, S. 2005. Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 625-631.
78. WIEBE, J. 1994. Tracking point of view in narrative. Comput. Linguist. 20, 2, 233-287.
79. WIEBE, J., WILSON, T., AND BELL, M. 2001. Identifying collocations for recognizing opinions. In Proceedings of the ACL/EACL Workshop on Collocation, Toulouse, France.
80. WIEBE, J., WILSON, T., BRUCE, R., BELL, M., AND MARTIN, M. 2004. Learning subjective language. Comput. Linguist. 30, 3, 277-308.
81. WIEBE, J., WILSON, T., AND CARDIE, C. 2005. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Lang. Resources Eval. 1, 2, 165-210.
82. WITTEN, I. H. AND FRANK, E. 2005. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufinann, San Francisco, CA.
83. WILSON, T., WIEBE, J., AND HOFFMAN, P. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, British Columbia, Canada, 347-354.
84. YANG, Y. AND PEDERSON, J. O. 1997. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, 412-420.
85. YANG, J. AND HONAVAR, V. 1998. Feature subset selection using a genetic algorithm. IEEE Intell. Syst. 13, 2, 44-49.
86. YI, J., NASUKAWA, T., BUNESCU, R., AND NIBLACK, W. 2003. Sentiment analyzer: Extracting sentiments about a given topic using natural language processing techniques. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 427-434.
87. YI, J. AND NIBLACK, W. 2005. Sentiment mining in WebFountain. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering, 1073-1083.
88. YU, H. AND HATZIVASSILOGLOU, V. 2003. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 129-136.
89. ZHENG, R., LI, J., HUANG, Z., AND CHEN, H. 2006. A framework for authorship analysis of online messages: Writing-Style features and techniques. J Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 57, 3, 378-393.
90. ZHOU, Y., REID, E., QIN, J., CHEN, H., AND LAI, G. 2005. U.S. extremist groups on the Web: Link and content analysis. IEEE Intell. Syst. 20, 5, 44-51.