The likelihood of use of social power strategies by school psychologists when consulting with teachers

Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 101-123

  Wilson, Kristen E ^a   Erchul, William P ^a   Raven, Bertram H ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45949085912     PISSN: 10474412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10474410701864321     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barry, B., & Watson, M. R. (1996). Communication aspects of dyadic social influence in organizations: A review and integration of conceptual and empirical developments. In B.R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 19 (pp. 269-317). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Bass, B. M. (1981). Stodgill's handbook of leadership (Rev. ed.). New York: Free Press.
3. Carli, L. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81-99.
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Conoley, J. C., & Gutkin, T. B. (1986). School psychology: A reconceptualization of service delivery realities. In S. N. Elliott & J. C. Witt (Eds.), The delivery of psychological services in schools: Concepts, processes, and issues (pp. 393-424). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Curtis, M. J., Grier, E. C., & Hunley, S. A. (2004). The changing face of school psychology: Trends in data and projections for the future. School Psychology Review, 33, 49-66.
7. Erchul, W. P. (1992). On dominance, cooperation, teamwork, and collaboration in school-based consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 3, 363-366.
8. Erchul, W. P. (1999). Two steps forward, one step back: Collaboration in school-based consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 191-203.
9. Erchul, W. P., Grissom, P. F., & Getty, K. C. (2008). Studying interpersonal influence within school consultation: Social power base and relational communication perspectives. In W. P. Erchul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of research in school consultation: Empirical foundations for the field (pp. 293-322). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/Taylor & Francis Group.
10. Erchul, W. P., & Raven, B. H. (1997). Social power in school consultation: A contemporary view of French and Raven's bases of power model. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 137-171.
11. Erchul, W. P., Raven, B. H., & Ray, A. G. (2001). School psychologists' perceptions of social power bases in teacher consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12, 1-23.
12. Erchul, W. P., Raven, B. H., & Whichard, S. M. (2001). School psychologist and teacher perceptions of social power in consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 483-497.
13. Erchul, W. P., Raven, B. H., & Wilson, K. E. (2004). The relationship between gender of consultant and social power perceptions within school consultation. School Psychology Review, 33, 582-590.
14. Fagan, T. K., & Wise, P. S. (2007). School psychology: Past, present, and future (3rd ed.). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
15. French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
16. Gruber, K. J., & White, J. W. (1986). Gender differences in the perceptions of self's and others' use of power strategies. Sex Roles, 15, 109-118.
17. Gutkin, T. B. (1999). Collaborative versus directive/prescriptive/expert school-based consultation: Reviewing and resolving a false dichotomy. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 161-190.
18. Harper, N. L., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). A comparison of persuasive strategies used by female and male managers: An examination of downward influence. Communication Quarterly, 36, 157-168.
19. Hughes, J. N. (1992). Social psychological foundations of consultation. In F. J. Medway & T. P. Cafferty (Eds.), School psychology: A social psychological perspective (pp. 269-303). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 259-273.
21. Koslowsky, M., Schwarzwald, J., & Ashuri, S. (2001). On the relationship between subordinates' compliance to power sources and organizational attitudes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 455-476.
22. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Roland.
23. Martin, R. (1978). Expert and referent power: A framework for understanding and maximizing consultation effectiveness. Journal of School Psychology, 16, 49-55.
24. Martin, R., & Curtis, M. (1980). Effects of age and experience of consultant and consultee on consultation outcome. American Journal of Community Psychology, 8, 733-736.
25. Noell, G. H. (2008). Research examining the relationships among consultation process, treatment integrity, and outcomes. In W. P. Erchul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of research in school consultation: Empirical foundations for the field (pp. 323-341). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/Taylor & Francis Group.
26. Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., LaFleur, L. H., Mortenson, B. P., Ranier, D. D., & LeVelle, J. (2000). Increasing intervention implementation in general education following consultation: A comparison of two follow-up strategies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 271-284.
27. Offermann, L. R., & Schrier, P. E. (1985). Social influence strategies: The impact of sex, role, and attitudes toward power. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 286-300.
28. O'Keefe, D. J., & Medway, F. J. (1997). The application of persuasion research to consultation in school psychology. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 173-193.
29. Pierro, A., De Grada, E., Raven, B. H., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2004). Fonti, antecedentie conguenti del potere organizzativi: l'Interpersonal Power/ Interaction Model [Prior and subsequent power in organizational contexts: The power/interaction model of interpersonal influence.] In A. Pierro (Ed.), Potere e leadership [Power and leadership] (pp. 33-58). Rome: Carocci.
30. Raven, B. H. (1965). Social influence and power. In I. D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 371-382). New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.
31. Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217-244.
32. Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 227-251.
33. Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307-332.
34. Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., & Agassi, V. (2001). Captains' leadership type and police officers' compliance to power bases. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 273-290.
35. Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., & Allouf, M. (2005). Group membership, status, and social power preference. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 644-665.
36. Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., & Ochana-Levin, T. (2004). Usage of and compliance with power tactics in routine versus nonroutine work settings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(3), 385-402.
37. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.
38. Tannen, D. (1994). Talking 9 to 5: How women's and men's conversational styles affect who gets heard, who gets credit, and what gets done at work. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc.
39. Timmerman, L. M. (2002). Comparing the production of power in language on the basis of sex. In M. Allen, R. W. Priess, B. M. Gayle, & Burrell, N. (Eds.), Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 73-88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1991). Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525-535.