Usage of and compliance with power tactics in routine versus nonroutine work settings

Journal of Business and Psychology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 385-402

  Schwarzwald, Joseph ^a   Koslowsky, Meni ^a   Ochana Levin, Tali ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Compliance; Interpersonal influence; Organizational structure; Social power

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043158366     PISSN: 08893268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:JOBU.0000016713.86935.1b     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aguinis, H. & Adams, S. K. R. (1998). Social-role versus structural models of gender and influence used in organizations: A strong inference approach. Group and Organization Management, 23, 414-446.
2. Baron, R. A. (1989). Personality and organizational conflict: Effects of type A behavior pattern and self-monitoring. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 281-297.
3. Bui, K. V., Raven, B. H., & Schwarzwald, J. (1994). Interpersonal satisfaction and influence tactics in close heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 429-442.
4. Dansereau, F., Jr., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
5. Eagly, A. H. (1983). Gender and social influence: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 38, 971-981.
6. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A sex-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145-158.
8. Eagly, A. H. & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
9. Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Falbe, C. M., & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 638-652.
11. Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 618-629.
12. French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Institute for Social Research.
13. Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role making model of leadership in formal organizations: A developmental approach. Organization and Administrative Science, 61, 143-165.
14. Harrison, E. F. (1975). The managerial decision making process. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
15. Johnson, P. (1976). Women and power: Toward a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 99-110.
16. Kipnis, D. (1976). The powerholders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. (1983). An influence perspective on bargaining within organizations. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.) Negotiating in organizations (pp. 303-319). Beverly Hills: Sage.
18. Koslowsky, M. & Schwarzwald, J. (1993). The use of power tactics to gain compliance: Testing aspects of Raven's (1988) theory in conflictual situations. Social Behavior and Personality, 21, 135-144.
19. Koslowsky, M., & Schwarzwald, J. (2001). The power interaction model: Theory, methodology, and empirical applications. In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. A. Bargh (Eds.) The Use and Abuse of Power (pp. 195-214). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
20. Koslowsky, M., Schwarzwald, J. & Ashuri, S. (2001). On the Relationship between Subordinates' compliance to Power Sources and Organizational Attitudes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 555-476.
21. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22. Mintzberg, H. (1983a). Power in and around organizations: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23. Mintzberg, H. (1983b). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24. Podsakoff, P. M. & Schriesheim, C. A. (1985). Field studies of French and Raven's bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 387-411.
25. Raven, B. H. (1965). Social influence and power. In D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.). Current studies in social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
26. Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217-244.
27. Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49 (Whole no. 4): 227-251.
28. Raven, B. H. (1999). Influence, power, religion, and the mechanisms of social control. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 161-186.
29. Raven, B. F., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1970). Conflict and power. In P. G. Swingle (Ed.), The structure of conflict (pp. 69-109). New York: Academic Press.
30. Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307-322.
31. Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1999). Gender, self-esteem, and focus of interest in the use of power strategies by adolescents in conflict situations. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 15-32.
32. Tedeschi, J. T. (1990). Self-presentation and social influence: An interactionist prospective. In M. J. Cody and M. L. McLaughlin (Eds.), The psychology of tactical communication (pp. 301-323). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
33. Tedeschi, J. T., Schlenker, B. R, & Bonoma, T. V. (1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle? American Psychologist. 26, 685-695.
34. Vecchio, R. P., & Sussmann, M. (1989). Preferences for forms of supervisory social influence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 135-143.
35. Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36. Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1991). Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 416-423.