Systematics of Fraxinus (Oleaceae) and evolution of dioecy

Plant Systematics and Evolution

Volumn 273, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 25-49

  Wallander, Eva ^a  

^a THE NATURE CONSERVANCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Fraxinus; ITS; Key; Oleaceae; Phylogeny; Section Pauciflorae; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

FRAXINUS; FRAXINUS ANOMALA; FRAXINUS CUSPIDATA; FRAXINUS DIPETALA; FRAXINUS PLATYPODA; FRAXINUS QUADRANGULATA; FRAXINUS SPAETHIANA; HEXAPODA; OLEACEAE;

EID: 45849138951     PISSN: 03782697     EISSN: 16156110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-008-0005-3     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Álvarez I, Wendel JF (2003) Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Molec Phylogenet Evol 29:417-434
2. Anderson E, Turrill WB (1938) Statistical studies on two populations of Fraxinus. New Phytol 37:160-172
3. Archibald JK, Mort ME, Crawford DJ (2003) Bayesian inference of phylogeny: a non-technical primer. Taxon 52:187-191
4. Bailey CD, Carr TG, Harris SA, Hughes CE (2003) Characterization of angiosperm nrDNA polymorphism, paralogy, and pseudogenes. Molec Phylogenet Evol 29:435-455
5. Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter MJ, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell CS, Donoghue MJ (1995) The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on Angiosperm phylogeny. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 82:247-277
6. Barker NP, Vanderpoorten A, Morton CM, Rourke JP (2004) Phylogeny, biography, and the evolution of life-history traits in Leucadendron (Proteaceae). Molec Phylogenet Evol 33:845-860
7. Black CL, Beckmann RL (1983) The variability of nuclear DNA and its implications for polyploidy in white ash (Fraxinus americana L.: Oleaceae). Amer J Bot 70:1420-1423
8. Black-Schaefer CL, Beckmann RL (1989) Foliar flavonoids and the determination of ploidy and gender in Fraxinus americana and Fraxinus pennsylvanica (Oleaceae). Castanea 54:115-118
9. Call VB, Dilcher DL (1992) Investigations of angiosperms from the Eocene of southeastern North America: samaras of Fraxinus wilcoxiana Berry. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 74:249-266
10. Chang CS, Min WK, Jeon JI (2002) Species relationships of Fraxinus chiisanensis Nakai and subsect. Melioides of sect. Fraxinus-as revealed by morphometrics and flavonoids. Korean J Pl Tax 32:55-76
11. Charlesworth D (1984) Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biol J Linn Soc 22:333-348
12. Cummings MP, Handley SA, Myers DS, Reed DL, Rokas A, Winka K (2003) Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case. Syst Biol 52:477-487
13. Dayton WA (1954) Some more notes on United States ashes (Fraxinus). J Wash Acad Sci 44:885-390
14. de Jong PC (1990) The genus Fraxinus. Dendroflora 26:30-39
15. Denk T, Grimm GW, Hemleben V (2005) Patterns of molecular and morphological differentiation in Fagus (Fagaceae): phylogenetic implications. Amer J Bot 92:1006-1016
16. Erixon P, Svennblad B, Britton T, Oxelman B (2003) Reliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics. Syst Biol 52:665-673
17. Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) Abiotic pollination. In: The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 34-40
18. Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C (1994) Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319
19. Felsenstein J (1978) Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst Zool 27:401-410
20. Fernandez-Manjarres JF, Gerard PR, Dufour J, Raquin C, Frascaria-Lacoste N (2006) Differential patterns of morphological and molecular hybridization between Fraxinus excelsior L. and Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl (Oleaceae) in eastern and western France. Molec Ecol 15:3245-3257
21. Franco J, Rocha Afonso ML (1972) In: Tutin TG et al (eds) Flora Europaea, vol 3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 53-54
22. FRAXIGEN (2005) Ash species in Europe: biological characteristics and practical guidelines for sustainable use. Oxford Forestry Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, 128 pp
23. Fukarek P (1960) Différences morphologiques et anatomiques entre le Frêne commun (Fraxinus excelsior L.) et le Frêne oxyphylle (F. angustifolia Vahl). Bull Soc Bot Fr 107:192-199
24. Galicia-Herbada D (2006) Origin and diversification of Thymelaea (Thymelaeaceae): inferences from a phylogenetic study based on ITS (rDNA) sequences. Pl Syst Evol 257:159-187
25. Gielly L, Taberlet P (1994) Chloroplast DNA polymorphism at the intrageneric level and plant phylogenies. C R Acad Sci III 317:685-692
26. Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Källersjö M., Oxelman B, Ramírez MJ, Szumik CA (2003) Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics 19:324-332
27. Green PS (1991) Notes on Oleaceae from "Flora Mesoamericana". Kew Bull 46:273-276
28. Grohmann F (1974) Oleaceae. Flora West Pak 59:1-27
29. Grunwald C, Karschon R (1984) Sexual breeding system and morphological variation in some stands of Fraxinus syriaca Boiss. Silvae Genet 33(6):182-186
30. Guindon S, Lethiec F, Duroux P, Gascuel O (2005) PHYML Online: web server for fast maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic inference. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W557-W559
31. Gyenova F (1993) Phenological and morphological studies of the inflorescences and flowers of Caucasian ash (Fraxinus oxycarpa Willd.). Nauka za Gorata 30:16-22
32. Hara H (1956) Critical notes on some type specimens of East-Asiatic plants in foreign herbaria (7). J Jap Bot 31:57-60
33. Hara H (1982) Oleaceae. In: Hara H, Chater AO, Williams LHJ (eds) An enumeration of the flowering plants of Nepal, vol 3. Trustees of British Museum, London, pp 79-82
34. Harborne JB, Green PS (1980) A chemotaxonomic survey of flavonoids in leaves of the Oleaceae. Bot J Linn Soc 81:155-167
35. Hardin JW (1974) Studies of the southeastern United States flora. IV. Oleaceae. SIDA 5:274-285
36. Hardin JW, Beckmann RL (1982) Atlas of foliar surface features in woody plants, V. Fraxinus (Oleaceae) of eastern North America. Brittonia 34:129-140
37. Heuertz M, Carnevale S, Fineschi S, Sebastini F, Hausman JF, Paule L, Vendramin GG (2006) Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of European ashes, Fraxinus sp. (Oleaceae): roles of hybridization and life history traits. Molec Ecol 15:2131-2140
38. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755
39. Jeandroz S, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Bousquet J (1996) Molecular recognition of the closely related Fraxinus excelsior and F. oxyphylla (Oleaceae) by RAPD markers. For Genet 3:237-242
40. Jeandroz S, Roy A, Bousquet J (1997) Phylogeny and phylogeography of the circumpolar genus Fraxinus (Oleaceae) based on internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Molec Phylogenet Evol 7:241-251
41. Kang U, Chang CS, Min WK (2002) Species delimitation and morphometric analysis of Fraxinus sieboldiana complex and F. rhynchophylla complex. J Korean For Soc 91:381-395
42. Kartesz JT (1994) A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada and Greenland (checklist), vol 1, 2nd edn. Timber Press, Portland, pp 393-394
43. Kitagawa M (1979) Neo-Lineamenta Florae Manshuricae. A. R. Ganther K.-G., Vaduz, pp 510-511
44. Lingelsheim A (1907) Vorarbeiten zu einer Monographie der Gattung Fraxinus. Engler's Bot Jahrb 40:185-223
45. Lingelsheim A (1920) Oleaceae-Oleoideae-Fraxineae. In: Engler A. Das Pflanzenreich IV, vol 243, pp 1-61
46. Little EL (1952) Notes on Fraxinus (ash) in the United States. J Wash Acad Sci 42:369-380
47. Martins L (2006) Systematics and biogeography of Klasea (Asteraceae-Cardueae) and a synopsis of the genus. Bot J Linn Soc 152:435-464
48. Metcalfe CR (1938) Anatomy of Fraxinus oxycarpa and F. pallisae. Kew Bull 0:258-262
49. Miller GN (1955) The genus Fraxinus, the ashes, in North America, North of Mexico. Cornell Univ Agric Exp Station Memoir 335:1-64
50. Min WK, Jeon JI, Chang CS (2001) A taxonomic reconsideration of Fraxinus chiisanensis (Oleaceae) in Korea. J Korean For Soc 90:266-267
51. Ming J, Liao HR (1998) On the present situation of Fraxinus hupehensis and its sustainable utilization. J Pl Res Environ 7:19-22
52. Morand ME, Vedel F, Raquin C, Frascaria-Lacoste N (2001) A rapid and efficient method for the isolation of mitochondrial DNA from angiosperm tree species. Application to the restriction fragment length polymorphism distinction between European and American ashes. Molec Ecol 1:67-70
53. Murray E (1968) Oleaceae. Flora Iran 52:1-11
54. Murray E (1982) Notae Spermatophytae. Kalmia 12:20
55. Nakai T (1929) Plantae Japanice et Koreanae. Bot Mag (Tokyo) 43:446
56. Nakaike T (1972) A synoptical study on the genus Fraxinus from Japan, Korea and Formosa. Bull Nat Sci Mus Tokyo 15:475-512
57. Nickrent DL, Schuette KP, Starr EM (1994) A molecular phylogeny of Arceuthobium (Viscaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Amer J Bot 81:1149-1160
58. Nikolaev EV (1981) The genus Fraxinus (Oleaceae) in the flora of the USSR. Bot Zhurn 66:1419-1432
59. Noh EW, Choi YI, Lee EJ, Song WS (1999) RFLP analysis of nuclear ribosomal DNA repeats in several selected species of Fraxinus in Korea. FRI J For Sci 61:1-8
60. Nylander JAA 2004. MrModeltest 2.2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden
61. Pannell J (2002) The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 33:397-425
62. Plunkett GM, Wen J, Lowry PP II (2004) Intrafamilial classifications and characters in Araliaceae: insights from the phylogenetic analysis of nuclear (ITS) and plastid (trnL-trnF) sequence data. Pl Syst Evol 245:1-39
63. Pol D (2004) Empirical problems of the hierarchical likelihood ratio test for model selection. Syst Biol 53:949-962
64. Posada D, Buckley T (2004) Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike Information Criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol 53:793-808
65. Raquin C, Brachet S, Jeandroz S, Vedel F, Frascaria-Lacoste N (2002) Combined analyses of microsatellite and RAPD markers demonstrate possible hybridisation between Fraxinus excelsior L. and Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. For Genet 9:111-114
66. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574
67. Rzedowski J, Calderón de Rzedowski G (2004) Oleaceae. Flora Bajío Regiones Adyacentes 124:1-37
68. Santamour FS (1962) The relation between polyploidy and morphology in white and biltmore ashes. Bull Torrey Bot Club 89:228-232
69. Sargent CS (1949) Oleaceae. In: Manual of the trees of North America (exclusive of Mexico), vol. 2, pp 832-858
70. Scheller H (1977) Kritische Studien über die kultivierten Fraxinus-Arten. Mitt Deutsch Dendrol Ges 69:49-162
71. Standley PC (1924) Oleaceae. In: Trees and shrubs of Mexico. Contr US Nat Herb 23:1132-1141
72. Sun SS (1985) Studies on the genus Fraxinus L. (Oleaceae) in China (I). Bull Bot Res 5:37-67
73. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
74. Tate JA, Fuertes Aguilar J, Wagstaff SJ, la Duke JC, Bodo Slotta TA, Simpson BB (2005) Phylogenetic relationships within the tribe Malveae (Malvaceae, subfamily Malvoideae) as inferred from ITS sequence data. Amer J Bot 92:584-602
75. Taylor H (1945) Cyto-taxonomy and phylogeny of the Oleaceae. Brittonia 5:337-367
76. USDA, NRCS. (2007) The PLANTS Database ( http://plants.usda.gov ). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, 70874-4490 USA
77. Ueda K (1996) Androdioecism in Chionanthus retusus (Oleaceae). J Phytogeogr Taxon 44:93-94
78. Vassiliadis C, Saumitou-Laprade P, Lepart J, Viard F (2002) High male reproductive success of hermaphrodites in the androdioecious Phillyrea angustifolia. Evolution 56:1362-1373
79. Vassiljev VN (1952) Fraxinus. In: Komarov VL (ed) Flora URSS 18:485-502.
80. English translation by Landau N (1967). In: Flora of the USSR 18:357-370)
81. Vines RA (1984) Fraxinus. In: Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of the Southwest, 5th edn. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 859-869
82. Wallander E (2001) Evolution of wind-pollination in Fraxinus (Oleaceae): an ecophylogenetic approach. PhD thesis, Göteborg University, Sweden
83. Wallander E, Albert VA (2000) Phylogeny and classification of Oleaceae based on rps16 and trnL-F sequence data. Amer J Bot 87:1827-1841
84. Wei Z (1992) Fraxinus. In: Chang M, Qui L (eds) Flora Reipublicae popularis Sinicae 61:5-39
85. Wei Z, Green PS (1996) Fraxinus. In: Wu Z, Raven PH (eds). Flora of China, vol 15. Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden, Missouri, pp 273-279
86. Whelden CM (1934) Studies in the genus Fraxinus: 1. A preliminary key to winter twigs for the sections Melioides and Bumelioides. J Arnold Arbor 15:118-126
87. Wilson KA, Wood CE (1959) The genera of Oleaceae in the southeastern United States. J Arnold Arbor 40:369-384
88. Wojciechowski MF, Sanderson MJ, Baldwin BG, Donoghue MJ (1993) Monophyly of aneuploid Astragalus (Fabaceae): evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Amer J Bot 80:711-722
89. Wright JW (1944a) Genotypic variation in white ash. J For 42:489-495
90. Wright JW (1944b) Ecotypic differentiation in Red Ash. J For 42:591-597
91. Wright JW (1944c) Epidermal characters in Fraxinus. Proc Ind Acad Sci 54:84-90
92. Wright JW (1962) Polyploidy and its importance in tree breeding. In: Genetics of forest tree improvement. FAO Forestry and Forest Products Studies, no. 16. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, pp 276-297
93. Wright JW (1965) Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.). In: Silvics of forest trees of the United States. H. A. Fowells, comp. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture handbook, vol 271. Washington, pp 185-190
94. Yaltirik F (1978) Oleaceae. In: Davis PH (ed) Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol 6. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 145-158
95. Yamazaki T (1993) Oleaceae. In: Iwatsuki K et al (eds) Flora of Japan IIIa, 122-135. Kodansha Ltd., Japan
96. Zander RH (2004) Minimal values for reliability of bootstrap and jackknife proportions, decay index, and Bayesian posterior probability. Phyloinformatics 2:1-13
97. Zhang L-B, Simmons MP, Kocyan A, Renner SS (2006) Phylogeny of the Cucurbitales based on DNA sequences of nine loci from three genomes: implications for morphological and sexual system evolution. Molec Phylogenet Evol 39:305-322