Patterns of molecular and morphological differentiation in Fagus (Fagaceae): Phylogenetic implications

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 92, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1006-1016

  Denk, Thomas ^a   Grimm, Guido W ^b   Hemleben, Vera ^b  

^a SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biogeography; Character evolution; Engleriana; Fagus; Intrageneric differentiation; Intraspecific variability; ITS; Molecular evolution

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION;

FAGACEAE; FAGUS; FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA; FAGUS HAYATAE;

EID: 19544383365     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.6.1006     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ÁLVAREZ, I., AND J. F. WENDEL. 2003. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 417-434.
2. BAILEY, C. D., T. G. CARR, S. A. HARRIS, AND C. E. HUGHES. 2003. Characterization of angiosperm nrDNA polymorphism, paralogy, and pseudogenes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 435-455.
3. BUDANTSEV, L. Y. 1997. Late Eocene flora of western Kamchatka. Proceedings of Komarov Botanical Institute 19: 3-115.
4. CAO, K.-F. 1995. Fagus dominance in Chinese montane forests: natural regeneration of Fagus lucida and Fagus hayatae var. pashanica. Ph. D. dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
5. CHELEBAEVA, A. I. 1980. New Cenozoic species of Fagus (Fagaceae) from Kamchatka and the significance of tertiary venation for the diagnostics of Fagus species. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 65: 3-12 [in Russian].
6. DENK, T. 2004. Revision of Fagus from the Cenozoic of Europe and southwestern Asia and its phylogenetic implications. Documenta naturae 150: 1-72.
7. DENK, T. 2003. Phylogeny of Fagus L. (Fagaceae) based on morphological data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 240: 55-81.
8. DENK, T., AND B. MELLER. 2001. The systematic significance of the cupule/ nut complex in living and fossil Fagus. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 869-897.
9. DENK T., G. GRIMM, K. STÖGERER, M. LANGER, AND V. HEMLEBEN. 2002. The evolutionary history of Fagus in western Eurasia: evidence from genes, morphology and the fossil record. Plant Systematics and Evolution 232: 213-236.
10. FOTJANOVA, L. I. 1982. Fagus napanensis. In A. Takhtajan [ed.], Magnoliophyta Fossilia URSS, vol. 2, Ulmaceae to Betulaceae, 64. Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
11. GRIMM, G. W. 2003. Tracing the mode and speed of intrageneric evolution: a phylogenetic case study on genus Acer L. (Aceraceae) and genus Fagus L. (Fagaceae) using fossil, morphological, and molecular data. Ph. D. dissertation, IfG, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tübingen, Germany.
12. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. RONQUIST. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
13. ILJINSKAJA, I. A. 1982. Fagus. In A. Takhtajan [ed.]. Magnoliophyta Fossilia URSS, vol. 2, Ulmaceae to Betulaceae, 60-73. Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.
14. KNOBLOCH, E. 1998, Der pliozäne Laubwald von Willershausen am Harz (Mitteleuropa). Documenta naturae 120: 1-302.
15. KUMAR, S., K. TAMURA, I. B. JAKOBSEN, AND M. NEI. 2001. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA. URL: http://www.megasoftware.net/
16. KVAČEK, Z., AND H. WALTHER. 1991. Revision der mitteleuropäischen Fagaceen nach blattepidermalen Charakteristiken. IV. Teil Fagus L. Feddes Repertorium 102: 471-534.
17. LENG, Q. 2000. Fagaceae from the Miocene Daotaiqiao Formation of Huanan, Heilongjiang, China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 39(Supplement): S251-S287.
18. LIU, Y. S., S. GUO, AND D. K. FERGUSON. 1996. Catalogue of Cenozoic megafossil plants in China. Palaeontographica B 238: 141-179.
19. MABBERLEY, D. J. 1997. The plant-book, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
20. MADDISON, P. W., AND D. R. MADDISON, 1992. MacClade, version 3. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
21. MANCHESTER, S. R., AND R. A. DILLHOFF. 2004. Fagus (Fagaceae) fruits, foliage and pollen from the Middle Eocene of Pacific Northwestern North America. Canadian Journal of Botany 82: 1509-1517.
22. MANOS, P. S., AND A. M. STANFORD. 2001. The historical biogeography of Fagaceae: tracking the Tertiary history of temperate and subtropical forests of the Northern Hemisphere. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162(6, Supplement): S77-S93.
23. MANOS, P. S., AND K. P. STEELE. 1997. Phylogenetic analyses of "higher" Hamamelididae based on plastid sequence data. American Journal of Botany 84: 1407-1419.
24. MANOS, P. S., Z.-K. ZHOU, AND C. H. CANNON. 2001. Systematics of Fagaceae: phylogenetic tests of reproductive trait evolution. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 1361-1379.
25. MEYER, H. W., AND S. R. MANCHESTER. 1997. The Oligocene Bridge Creek flora of the John Day Formation, Oregon. University of California Publications 141: 1-195.
26. PETERS, R. 1997. Beech forests. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
27. PIGG, K. B., AND W. C. WEHR. 2002. Tertiary flowers, fruits, and seeds of Washington state and adjacent areas, part III. Washington Geology 30: 3-16.
28. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
29. ROSENBERG, M. S., AND S. KUMER. 2001. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98: 10751-10756.
30. RYDIN, C., AND M. KÄLLERSJÖ. 2002. Taxon sampling and seed plant phylogeny. Cladistics 18: 485-513.
31. SCHMID, E. 2000. Palynologische Untersuchungen an Phosphoritknollen (Mitteloligozän) aus dem Tagebau Cospuden (Leipziger Bucht). Master's thesis, University of Vienna, Austria.
32. SHEN, C. F. 1992. A monograph of the genus Fagus Tourn. ex L. (Fagaceae). Ph. D. dissertation, The City University of New York, New York, USA.
33. STANFORD, A. M. 1998. The biogeography and phylogeny of Castanea, Fagus, and Juglans based on matK and ITS sequence data. Ph. D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
34. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1993. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 3.1.1. Computer program distributed through the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
35. TANAI, T. 1974. Evolutionary trend of the genus Fagus in the northern Pacific basin. Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany, Special Publication 1: 62-83.
36. TANAI, T. 1995. Fagaceous leaves from the Paleogene of Hokkaido. Japanese Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Tokyo, Series C 21: 71-101.
37. TIFFNEY, B. H., AND S. R. MANCHESTER. 2001. The use of geological and paleontological evidence in evaluating plant phylogeographic hypotheses in the Northern Hemisphere Tertiary. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162(6, Supplement): S3-S17.
38. VOLKOV, R. A., F. J. MEDINA, U. ZENTGRAF, AND V. HEMLEBEN. 2004. Molecular cell biology: organization and molecular evolution of rDNA, nucleolar dominance and nucleolus structure. In K. Esser, U. Lüttge, W. Beyschlag, and J. Murata [eds.], Progress in botany, vol. 65, 106-146. Springer, New York, USA.
39. WALTHER, H., AND R. ZETTER. 1993. Zur Entwicklung der paläogenen Fagaceen Mitteleuropas. Palaeontographica B 230: 183-194.
40. ZETTER, R. 1984. Morphologische Untersuchungen an Fagus-Blättern aus dem Neogen von Österreich. Beiträge zur Paläontologie Österreichs 11: 207-288.
41. ZHOU, G., AND X. LI. 1994. Species composition and structure of Chinese beech forests. Natural History Research 3: 21-26.