QSAR study on estrogenic activity of structurally diverse compounds using generalized regression neural network

Science in China, Series B: Chemistry

Volumn 51, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 677-683

  Ji, Li ^a   Wang, Xiaodong ^a   Luo, Si ^a   Qin, Liang ^a   Yang, Xvshu ^a   Liu, Shushen ^b   Wang, Liansheng ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Ministry of Education ^*  (China)

Author keywords

Endocrine disruptors; Estrogen receptor; Generalized regression neural network; Quantitative structure activity relationship

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; CHEMOTHERAPY; COMPUTER NETWORKS; DRUG DELIVERY; DRUG DOSAGE; DRUG THERAPY; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; ERBIUM; FOOD PROCESSING; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS; MIXTURES; MODEL STRUCTURES; MOLECULAR GRAPHICS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PHOTORESISTS; SULFUR COMPOUNDS; TELLURIUM COMPOUNDS;

DESCRIPTORS; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR (ER); ESTROGENIC ACTIVITIES; FEATURE SELECTION (FS); GENERALIZED REGRESSION NEURAL NETWORK (GRMM); NETWORK TECHNIQUES; POW ERFUL TOOL; PREDICTIVE POWER; QSAR MODELING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP (QSAS); RAPID SCREENING; SPRINGER (CO); STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS; TRADITIONAL TECHNIQUES; TRAINING SETS;

NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 45749155619     PISSN: 10069291     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11426-008-0070-z     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Cooper R L, Kavlock R J. Endocrine disruptors and reproductive development: A weight-of-evidence overview. J Endocrinol, 1997, 152(2): 159-166
2. Kavlock R J, Daston G P, DeRosa C, Fenner-Crisp P, Gray L E, Kaattari S, Lucier G, Luster M, Mac M J, Maczka C, Miller R, Moore J, Rolland R, Scott G, Sheehan D M, Sinks T, Tilson H A. Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: A report of the U.S. EPA sponsored workshop. Environ Health Persp, 1996, 104(Suppl 4): 715-740
3. Asikainen A, Kolehmainen M, Ruuskanen J, Tuppurainen K. Structure-based classification of active and inactive estrogenic compounds by decision tree, LVQ and kNN methods. Chemosphere, 2006, 62(4): 658-673
4. Waller C L, Oprea T I, Chae K, Park H K, Korach K S, Laws S C, Wiese T E, Kelce W R, Gray L E Jr. Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens. Chem Res Toxicol, 1996, 9(8): 1240-1248
5. Tong W, Perkins R, Xing L, Welsh W J, Sheehan D M. QSAR models for binding of estrogenic compounds to estrogen receptor alpha and beta subtypes. Endocrinology, 1997, 138(9): 4022-4025
6. Shi L M, Fang H, Tong W, Wu J, Perkins R, Blair R M, Branham W S, Dial S L, Moland C L, Sheehan D M. QSAR models using a large diverse set of estrogens. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 2001, 41(1): 186-195
7. Yu S J, Keenan S M, Tong W, Welsh W J. Influence of the structural diversity of data sets on the statistical quality of 3D-QSAR models: Predicting the estrogenic activity of xenoestrogens. Chem Res Toxicol, 2002, 15(10): 1229-1234
8. Colemana K P, Toscano W A, Wiese T E. QSAR Models of the in vitro estrogen activity of bisphenol A analogs. QSAR Comb Sci, 2003, 22: 78-88
9. Asikainen A, Ruuskanen J, Tuppurainen K. Spectroscopic QSAR methods and self-organizing molecular field analysis for relating molecular structure and estrogenic activity. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 2003, 43(6): 1974-1981
10. Waller C L. A comparative QSAR study using CoMFA, HQSAR and FRED/SKEYS paradigms for estrogen receptor binding affinities of structurally diverse compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 2004, 44: 758-765
11. Lill M A, Vedani A, Dobler M. Raptor: Combining dual-shell representation, Induced-fit simulation, and hydrophobicity scoring in receptor modeling: Application toward the simulation of structurally diverse ligand sets. J Med Chem, 2004, 47(25): 6174-6186
12. Marini F, Roncaglioni A, Novic M. Variable selection and interpretation in structure-affinity correlation modeling of estrogen receptor binders. J Chem Inf Model, 2005, 45: 1507-1519
13. Salomon R, Hemmen J. Accelerating back propagation through dynamic self-adaptation. Neual Networks, 1996, 9(4): 589-601
14. Bolanca T, Cerjan-Stefanovic S, Regelja M, Regelja H, Loncaric S. Development of an inorganic cations retention model in ion chromatography by means of artificial neural networks with different two-phase training algorithms. J Chromatogr A, 2005, 1085: 74-85
15. Engin M, Demirag S, Engin E, Celbi G, Ersan F, Asena E, Colakoglu Z. The classification of human tremor signals using artificial neural network. Expert Syst Appl, 2007, 33: 754-761
16. Yao X J, Panaye A, Doucet J P. Comparative study of qsar/qspr correlations using support vector machines, radial basis function neural networks, and multiple linear regression. J Chem Inf Model, 2004, 44: 1257-1266
17. Liu H, Papa E, Gramatica P. QSAR prediction of estrogen activity for a large set of diverse chemicals under the guidance of OECD principles. Chem Res Toxicol, 2006, 19: 1540-1548
18. Specht D F A. General Regression Neural Network. IEEE T Neural Network, 1991, 2(6): 568-576
19. Chtioui Y, Panigrahi S, Francl L. A generealized regression neural network and its application for leaf wetness prediction to forecast plant disease. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst, 1999, 48: 47-58
20. Tomoko N. Using general regression and probabilistic neural networks to predict human intestinal absorption with topological descriptors derived from two-dimensional chemical structures. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 2003, 43: 113-119
21. Philip D M, Peter C J. QSAR/QSPR studies using probabilistic neural networks and generalized regression neural networks. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 2002, 42: 1460-1470
22. Johanna K, Bettina W, Gerhard B, Klocker J, Wailzer B, Buchbauer G, Wolschann P. Bayesian neural networks for aroma classification. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 2002, 42: 1443-1449
23. Hilmi B C. Application of radial basis function and generalized regression neural networks in non-linear utility function specification for travel mode choice modeling. Math Comput Model, 2006, 44: 640-658
24. Kohonen T. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol Cybern, 1982, 43: 59-69
25. T. Kohonen J. Hynninen J. Kangas J. Laaksonen 1996 The Self-Oraganizing Map Program Package Technical Report A31 Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Computer and Information Science FIN-02150 Espoo, Finland
26. Kohonen T, Hynninen J, Kangas J, Laaksonen J. The Self-Oraganizing Map Program Package. Technical Report A31, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Computer and Information Science, FIN-02150 Espoo, Finland, 1996. Software available at http://www.cis.hut.fi/research/som_pak
27. Kuiper G G, Lemmen J G, Carlsson B, Corton J C, Safe S H, Saag P T, Burg B, Gustafsson J A. Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology, 1998, 139: 4252-4263
28. Todeschini R, Consonni V, Mauri A, Pavan M M. Dragon 2.1. Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy, 2002
29. Todeschini R, Consonni V. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors. Germany: Wiley-VCH, 2000
30. Johhnson S R. Prediction of physicochemical properties and biological activities from molecular structure and the use of computational neural networks for the analysis of sensor apply data. Doctor Dissertation. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University, 1999
31. Mcelroy N R. The prediction of physical properties and biological activities of orgnanic compounds from their molecular structures. Doctor Dissertation. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University, 2003
32. So S, Karplus M. Evolutionary optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationship: An application of genetic neural networks. J Med Chem, 1996, 39: 1521-1530
33. Rogers D, Hopfinger A J. Application of genetic function approximation to quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 1994, 34: 854-866
34. Boilot P, Hines E L, Gongora M A, Folland R S. Electronic noses inter-comparison, data fusion and sensor selection in discrimination of standard fruit solutions. Sens Actuat B-Chem, 2003, 88: 80-88
35. Massart D L, Vandeginste B G M, Buydens L M C. Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics, part A. Netherlands: Elsevier, 1997
36. Luke B T. Evolutionary programming applied to the development of quantitative structure activity relationships and quantitative structure property relationships. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 1994, 34: 1279-1287
37. Fang H, Tong W, Shi L, Blair R, Perkins R, Branham W S, Dial S L, Moland C L, Sheehan D M. Structure activity relationship for a large diverse set of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals. Chem Res Toxicol, 2001, 14: 280-294
38. Tong W, Fang H, Hong H, Xie Q, Perkins R, Anson1 J, Sheehan D M. Regulatory application of SAR/QSAR for priority setting of endocrine disruptors: A perspective. Pure Appl Chem, 2003, 75: 2375-2388
39. Asikainen A, Ruuskanen J, Tuppurainen K. Consensus kNN QSAR: A versatile method for predicting the estrogenic activity of organic compounds in silico. A comparative study with five estrogen receptors and a large, diverse set of ligands. Environ Sci Technol, 2004, 38(24): 6724-6729