A consideration of challenges to psychological assessment instruments used in forensic settings: Rorschach as exemplar

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 141-152

  Hilsenroth, Mark J ^a   Stricker, George ^a  

^a ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPERT WITNESS; FORENSIC MEDICINE; LEGAL ASPECT; MEASUREMENT; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGIST; RESEARCH; REVIEW;

EID: 4544325763     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8302_08     Document Type: Review

References (161)

1. Abraham, P., Lepisto, B., Lewis, M., Schultz, L., & Finkelberg, S. (1994). An outcome study: Changes in Rorschach variables of adolescents in residential treatment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 505-514.
2. Ackerman, M. J., & Ackerman, M. C. (1997). Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 137-145.
3. Ackerman, S., Hilsenroth, M., Clemence, A., Weatherill, R., & Fowler, C. (2000). The effects of social cognition and object representation on psychotherapy continuation. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 64, 386-408.
4. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
5. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
6. American Psychological Association Committee on Professional Practice Standards. (1994). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in divorce proceedings. American Psychologist, 49, 677-680.
7. Archer, R., & Newsom, C. (2000). Psychological test usage with adolescent clients: Survey update. Assessment, 7, 227-235.
8. Baity, M., & Hilsenroth, M. (1999). Rorschach aggression variables: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 72, 93-110.
9. Baity, M., & Hilsenroth, M. (2002). Rorschach aggressive content variable: A study of criterion validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 275-287.
10. Ball, J., Archer, R., & Imhof, E. (1994). Time requirements of psychological testing: A survey of practitioners. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 239-249.
11. Beck, A., & Steer, R. (1987). Beck Depression Inventory manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
12. Barrett, G., & Morris, S. (1993). The American Psychological Associations' amicus curiae brief in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins: The values of science versus the values of the law. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 201-216.
13. Bihlar, B., & Carlsson, A. (2000). An exploratory study of agreement between therapist's goals and patient's problems revealed by the Rorschach. Psychotherapy Research, 10, 196-214.
14. Bihlar, B., & Carlsson, A. (2001). Planned and actual goals in psychodynamic psychotherapies: Do patient's personality characteristics relate to agreement? Psychotherapy Research, 11, 383-400.
15. Blais, M., Hilsenroth, M., Castlebury, F., Fowler, C., & Baity, M. (2001). Predicting DSM-IV Cluster B personality disorder criteria from MMPI-2 and Rorschach data: A test of incremental validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 150-168.
16. Blatt, S., & Ford, R. (1994). Therapeutic change: An object relations perspective. New York: Plenum.
17. Boccaccini, M., & Brodsky, S. (1999). Diagnostic test usage by forensic psychologist in emotional injury cases. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 253-259.
18. Bornstein, R. F. (1996). Construct validity of the Rorschach Oral Dependency scale: 1967-1995. Psychological Assessment, 8, 200-205.
19. Bornstein, R. F. (1999). Criterion validity of objective and projective dependency tests: A meta-analytic assessment of behavioral prediction. Psychological Assessment, 11, 48-57. Borum, R., & Grisso, T. (1995). Psychological test use in criminal forensic evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 465-473.
20. Bornstein, R. F. (1999). Criterion validity of objective and projective dependency tests: A meta-analytic assessment of behavioral prediction. Psychological Assessment, 11, 48-57. Borum, R., & Grisso, T. (1995). Psychological test use in criminal forensic evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 465-473.
21. Breda v. Wolf Camera, 78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. 433 (S.D. Ga., 1998).
22. Brodsky, S., & McKinzey, R. (2002). The ethical confrontation of the unethical forensic colleague. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 307-309.
23. Butcher, J. (1998). Users guide for the Minnesota Report: Report for forensic settings. Minneapolis, MN: NCS.
24. Butcher, J., Graham, J., Ben-Porath, Y., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). MMP1-2: Manual for administration and scoring (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
25. Butcher, J., & Rouse, S. (1996). Personality: Individual differences and clinical assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 87-111.
26. Camara, W., Nathan, J., & Puente, A. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional use. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 141-154.
27. Clemence, A., & Handler, L. (2001). Psychological assessment on internship: A survey of training directors and their expectations for students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 18-47.
28. Colson, D., Eyman, J., & Coyne, L. (1994). Rorschach correlates of treatment difficulty and of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy with female psychiatric hospital patients. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 58, 383-388.
29. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).
30. Dawes, R. (1999). Two methods for studying incremental validity of a Rorschach variable. Psychological Assessment, 11, 297-302.
31. Edens, J., Cruise, K., & Buffington-Vollum, J. (2001). Forensic and correctional applications of the personality assessment inventory. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 519-543.
32. Elfhag, K., Rossner, S., Lindgren, T., Andersson, I., & Carlsson, A. (2004). Rorschach personality predictors of weight loss with behavior modification in obesity treatment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83.
33. Erdberg, P., & Shaffer, T. (1999, July). International symposium on Rorschach nonpatient data: Findings from around the world. Symposium presented at the 16th Congress of the International Rorschach Society, Amsterdam.
34. Erdberg, P., & Shaffer, T. (2001, March). An international symposium on Rorschach nonpatient data: Worldwide findings. Symposium presented at the annual convention of the Society for Personality Assessment, Philadelphia.
35. Exner, J. (1986). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System, Vol. 1: Basic foundaions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
36. Exner, J. (1993). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System, Vol. 1: Basic foundaions (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
37. Exner, J. E., Jr. (2001). A Rorschach workbook for the Comprehensive System (5th ed.). Asheville, NC: Rorschach Workshops.
38. Exner, J. E., Jr. (2002). A new nonpatient sample for the rorschach comprehensive sample: A progress report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 391-404.
39. Exner, J. E., Jr. (2003). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System: Vol. 1. Basic foundations (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
40. Exner, J. E., Jr., & Andronikof-Sanglade, A. (1992). Rorschach changes following brief and short-term therapy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 59, 59-71.
41. Exner, J. E., Jr., & Wiley, J. (1977). Some Rorschach data concerning suicide. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 339-348.
42. Federal rules of evidence. (1992). Boston: Little, Brown.
43. Forby, J., & Ben-Porath, Y. (2002). Use of the MMPI-2 in the treatment of offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 308-319.
44. Fowler, J. C., Ackerman, S., Speanberg, S., Bailey, A. Blagys, M., & Conklin, A. (2004). Personality and sympton change in treatment-refractory inpatients: Evaluation of the phase model of change using Rorschach, TAT, and DSM-IV Axis V. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83.
45. Fowler, J. C., Piers, C., Hilsenroth, M., Holdwick, D., & Padawer, R. (2001). Assessing risk factors for various degrees of suicidal activity: The Rorschach suicide constellation (S-CON). Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 333-351.
46. Frye v. United States, 292 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923).
47. Gacono, C. (2002a). Introduction to a special series: Forensic psychodiagnostic testing. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2, 1-10.
48. Gacono, C. (2002b). Why there is a need for the personality assessment of offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 271-273.
49. Gacono, C., Evans, B., & Viglione, D. (2002). The Rorschach in forensic practice. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2, 33-54.
50. Gacono, C., Loving, J., Evans, B., & Jumes, M. (2002) The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised: PCL-R testimony and forensic practice. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2, 11-32.
51. Ganellen, R. (1994). Attempting to conceal psychological disturbance: MMPI defensive response sets and the Rorschach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 423-437.
52. Ganellen, R., Wasyliw, O., Haywood, T., & Grossman, L. (1996). Can psychosis be malingered on the Rorschach? An empirical study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 65-80.
53. Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
54. Garb, H. (1999). Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in clinical and forensic settings. Assessment, 6, 313-315.
55. Garb, H., Florio, C., & Grove, W. (1998). The validity of the Rorschach and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: Results from meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 9, 402-404.
56. Garb, H., Wood, J., & Nezworski, M. (2000a). Projective techniques and the detection of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 437-438.
57. Garb, H., Wood, J., & Nezworski, M. (2000b). Projective techniques and the detection of child sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment, 5, 161-168.
58. Garb, H., Wood, J., Nezworski, M., Grove, W., & Stejskal, W. (2001). Towards a resolution of the Rorschach controversy. Psychological Assessment, 13, 433-448.
59. General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 118 S. Ct. 512 (1997).
60. Grønnerød, C. (2003). Temporal stability in the Rorschach method: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 272-293.
61. Grønnerød, C. (2004). Rorschach assessment of changes following psychotherapy: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83.
62. Grossman, L., Wasyliw, O., Benn, A., & Gyoerkoe, K. (2002). Can sex offenders who minimize on the MMPI conceal psychopathology on the Rorschach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 484-501.
63. Grove, W., & Barden, R. (1999). Protecting the integrity of the legal system: The admissibility of testimony from mental health experts under Daubert/Kumho analysis. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 5, 224-242.
64. Grove, W., Barden, R., Garb, H., & Lilienfeld, S. (2002). Reply to Ritzler, Erard, & Pettigrew. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 8, 216-234.
65. Hamel, M., Shaffer, T., & Erdberg, P. (2000). A study of nonpatient preadolescent Rorschach protocols. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 280-294.
66. Hare, R. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
67. Hartman, E., Wang, C., Berg, M., & Saether, L. (2003). Depression and vulnerability as assessed by the Rorschach method. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 243-256.
68. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
69. Henefin, M. S., Kipen, H. M., & Poulter, S. R. (2000). Reference guide on medical testimony. In Reference manual on scientific evidence (pp. 439-484). Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
70. Hiller, J., Rosenthal, R., Bornstein, R., Berry, D., & Brunell-Neuleib, S. (1999). A comparative meta-analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity. Psychological Assessment, 11, 278-296.
71. Hilsenroth, M., Fowler, C., & Padawer, J. (1998). The Rorschach Schizophrenia Index (SCZI): An examination of reliability, validity, and diagnostic efficiency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 514-534.
72. Hilsenroth M., & Handler, L. (1995). A survey of graduate students' experiences, interests, and attitudes about learning the Rorschach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 243-257.
73. Hilsenroth, M. J., Handler, L., Toman, K. M., & Padawer, J. R. (1995). Rorschach and MMPI-2 indices of early psychotherapy termination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 956-965.
74. Hunsley, J., & Bailey, J. (1999). The clinical utility of the Rorschach: Unfulfilled promises and an uncertain future. Psychological Assessment, 11, 266-277.
75. Hunsley, J., & Bailey, J. (2001). Wither the Rorschach? An analysis of the evidence. Psychological Assessment, 13, 472-485.
76. Janson, H., & Stattin, H. (2003). Prediction of adolescent and adult delinquency from childhood Rorschach ratings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 51-63.
77. Jørgensen, K., Andersen, T., & Dam, H. (2000). The diagnostic efficiency of the Rorschach Depression Index and the Schizophrenia Index: A review. Assessment, 7, 259-280.
78. Kamphuis, J., Kugeares, S., & Finn, S. (2000). Rorschach correlates of sexual abuse: Trauma content and aggression indexes. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 212-224.
79. Kessler, R. C., McGonagle, K. A., Zhao, S., Nelson, C. B., Hughes, M., Eshleman, S., et al. (1994). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 8-19.
80. Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 119 S. Ct. 1167 (1999).
81. Lally, S. (2003). What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? A survey of experts. Professional Psychology, 34, 491-498.
82. Leavitt, F. (2000). Surviving roots of trauma: Prevalence of silent signs of sex abuse in patients who recover memories of childhood. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 311-323
83. Leifer, M., Shapiro, J., Martone, M., & Kassem, L. (1991). Rorschach assessment of psychological functioning in sexually abused girls. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 14-28.
84. Lewis, J., Simcox, A., & Berry, D. (2002). Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. Psychological Assessment, 14, 170-176.
85. Lilienfeld, S., Fowler, K., & Lohr, J. (2003). And the band played on: Science, pseudoscience, and the Rorschach Inkblot Method. The Clinical Psychologist, 56, 6-7.
86. Lilienfeld, S., Wood, J., & Garb, H. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 27-66.
87. Lohr, J., Fowler, K., & Lilienfeld, S. (2002). The dissemination and promotion of pseudoscience in clinical psychology: The challenge to legitimate clinical science. The Clinical Psychologist, 55, 4-10.
88. Loving, J. (2002). Treatment planning with the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 281-293.
89. McCann, J. T. (1998). Defending the Rorschach in court: An analysis of admissibility using legal and professional standards. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 125-144.
90. McCann, J. (2002). Guidelines for forensic application of the MCMI-III. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2, 55-70.
91. McCann, J. (2004). Projective assessment of personality in forensic settings. In M. Herson (Series Ed.) & M. Hilsenroth & D. Segal (Vol. Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment: Vol. 2. Personality assessment (pp. 562-572). New York: Wiley.
92. McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690-702.
93. McKinzey, R. (2002, April 30). Prior peer review of "Rorschach interscorer agreement." WebPsychEmpiricist. Retrieved July 3, 2002, from http:// www.woe.info/papers_table.html
94. McKinzey, R., & Campagna, V. (2002, April 27). The Rorschach, Exner's Comprehensive System, interscorer agreement, and death. WebPsychEmpiricist. Retrieved July 3, 2002, from http://www.wpe.info/ papers_table.html
95. Meloy, J., Hansen, T., & Weiner, I. (1997). Authority of the Rorschach: Legal citations during the past 50 years. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 53-62.
96. Meyer, G. (1997a). Assessing reliability: Critical correlations for a critical examination of the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Psychological Assessment, 9, 480-489.
97. Meyer, G. (1997b). Thinking clearly about reliability: More critical correlations regarding the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Psychological Assessment, 9, 495-498.
98. Meyer, G. (2000a). Incremental validity of the Rorschach Prognostic Rating scale over the MMPI Ego Strength Scale and IQ. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74, 356-370.
99. Meyer, G. (2000b). On the science of Rorschach research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 46-81.
100. Meyer, G. (2001). Evidence to correct misperceptions about Rorschach norms. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 8, 389-396.
101. Meyer, G. (2002). Exploring possible ethnic differences and bias in the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 104-129.
102. Meyer, G., & Archer, R. (2001). The hard science of Rorschach research: What do we know and where do we go. Psychological Assessment, 13, 486-502.
103. Meyer, G., Finn, S., Eyde, L., Kay, G., Moreland, K., Dies, R., et al. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128-165.
104. Meyer, G., & Handler, L. (1997). The ability of the Rorschach to predict subsequent outcome: A meta-analysis of the Rorschach Prognostic Rating Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 1-38.
105. Meyer, G., Hilsenroth, M., Baxter, D., Exner, J., Fowler, C., Piers, C., et al. (2002). An examination of interrater reliability for scoring the Rorschach Comprehensive System in eight data sets. Journal of Personality Assessment, 78, 219-274.
106. Millon, T. (1983). MCMI manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
107. Millon, T. (1987). Manualfor the MCMI-11 (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
108. Millon, T., Davis, R., & Millon, C. (1997). MCMI-III manual (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
109. Mittman, B. (1983). Judges' ability to diagnose schizophrenia on the Rorschach: Effect of malingering. Dissertation Abstracts International 44, 4B. (Digital Dissertations AAT 8315540)
110. Morey, L. (1991). The Personality Assessment Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
111. Morey, L., & Quigley, B. (2002). The use of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in assessing offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 333-349.
112. Nygren, M. (2004). Rorschach Comprehensive System variables in relation to assessing dynamic capacity and ego strength for psychodynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83.
113. O'Connell, M., Cooper, S., Perry, C., & Hoke, L. (1989). The relationship between thought disorder and psychotic symptoms in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 273-278.
114. O'Conner, M., & Krauss, D. (2001). Legal update: New developments in Rule 702. APLS News, 21, 1-4, 18.
115. Otto, R. (2002). Use of the MMPI-2 in forensic settings. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2, 71-92.
116. Perry, W. (2001). Incremental validity of the Ego Impairment Index: A re-examination of Dawes (1999). Psychological Assessment, 13, 403-407.
117. Perry, W. (2003). Let's call the whole thing off: A response to Dawes (2001). Psychological Assessment, 15, 582-585.
118. Perry, W., & Braff, D. (1994). Information-processing deficits and thought disorder in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 363-367.
119. Perry, W. & Braff, D. (1998). A multimethod approach to assessing perseverations in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia Research, 33, 69-77.
120. Perry, W., Geyer, M. A., & Braff, D. L. (1999). Sensorimotor gating and thought disturbance measured in close temporal proximity in schizophrenic patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 277-281.
121. Perry, W., Minassian, A., Cadenhead, K., Sprock, J., & Braff, D. (2003). The use of the Ego Impairment Index across the schizophrenia spectrum. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, 50-57.
122. Piotrowski, C., & Zalewski, C. (1993). Training in psychodiagnostic testing in APA-approved PsyD and PhD clinical psychology programs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 394-405.
123. Presley, G., Smith, C., Hilsenroth, M., & Exner, J. (2001). Rorschach validity with African Americans. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 491-507.
124. Quinnell, F., & Bow, J. (2001). Psychological tests used in child custody evaluations. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 491-501.
125. Raphael, A., Golden, C., & Cassidy-Feltgen, S. (2002). The Bender-Gestalt Test (BGT) in forensic assessment. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2, 93-106.
126. Retzlaff, P., Stoner, J., & Kliensasser, D. (2002). The use of the MCMI-III in screening and triage of offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 319-333.
127. Ritzler, B., Erard, R., & Pettigrew, G. (2002a). A final reply to Grove and Barden: The relevance of the Rorschach Comprehensive System for expert testimony. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 8, 235-246.
128. Ritzler, B., Erard, R., & Pettigrew, G. (2002b). Protecting the integrity of Rorschach expert witnesses: A reply to Grove and Barden (1999) re: The admissibility of testimony under Daubert/Kumho analysis. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 8, 201-215.
129. Rogers, R., Sewell, R., Grandjean, N., & Vitacco, M. (2002). The detection of feigned mental disorders on specific competency measures. Psychological Assessment, 14, 177-183.
130. Rogers, R., Sewell, R., & Salekin, K. (1994). A meta-analysis of malingering on the MMPI-2. Assessment, 1, 227-237.
131. Rosenthal, R., Hiller, J., Bornstein, R., Berry, D., & Brunell-Neuleib, S. (2001). Meta-analytic methods, the Rorschach, and the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 13, 449-451.
132. Schaffer, T., Erdberg, P., & Haroian, J. (1999). Current nonpatient data for the Rorschach, WAIS-R, and MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 305-316.
133. Shedler, J., Mayman, M., & Manis, M. (1993). The illusion of mental health. American Psychologist, 48, 1117-1131.
134. Stedman, J., Hatch, J., & Schoenfeld, L. (2000). Preinternship preparation in psychological testing and psychotherapy: What internship directors say they expect. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 321-326.
135. Stokes, J., Pogge, D., Powell-Lunder, J., Ward, A., Bilginer, L., & DeLuca, V. (2003). The Rorschach Ego Impairment Index: Prediction of treatment outcome in a child psychiatric population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 11-19.
136. Stricker, G., & Gold, J. (1999). The Rorschach: Toward a nomothetically based, idiographically applicable configurational model. Psychological Assessment, 11, 240-250.
137. Tingey, R., Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., & Hansen, N. (1996a). Assessing clinical significance: Proposed extensions to method. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 109-123.
138. Tingey, R., Lambert, M. J., Burlingame, G. M., & Hansen, N. (1996b). Clinically significant change: Practical indicators for evaluating psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 6, 144-153.
139. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1999) Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: Author.
140. Viglione, D. J. (1999). A review of recent research addressing the utility of the Rorschach. Psychological Assessment, 11, 251-265.
141. Viglione, D., & Hilsenroth, M. (2001). The Rorschach: Facts, fictions, and future. Psychological Assessment, 13, 452-471.
142. Watkins, C., Campbell, V., Nieberding, R., & Hallmark, R. (1995). Contemporary practice of psychological assessment by clinical psychologists. Professional Psychological Research and Practice, 26, 54-60.
143. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
144. Weiner, I. (1996). Some observations on the validity of the Rorschach Inkblot Method. Psychological Assessment, 8, 206-213.
145. Weiner, I. (1999). What the Rorschach can do for you: Incremental validity in clinical applications. Assessment, 6, 327-338.
146. Weiner, I. (2001). Considerations in collecting Rorschach reference data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 122-127.
147. Weiner, I., & Exner, J. (1991). Rorschach changes in long-term and short-term psychotherapy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56, 453-465.
148. Weiner, I., Exner, J., & Sciara, A. (1996). Is the Rorschach welcome in the courtroom? Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 422-424.
149. Weiner, I., Spielberger, C., & Abeles, N. (2002). Scientific psychology and the Rorschach Inkblot Method. The Clinical Psychologist, 55, 7-12.
150. Weiner, I., Spielberger, C., & Abeles, N. (2003). Once more around the park: Correcting misinformation about Rorschach assessment. The Clinical Psychologist, 56, 8-9.
151. Westen, D., & Weinberger, J. (2004). When clinical description becomes statistical prediction. American Psychologist, 59.
152. Westen, D., & Weinberger, J. (in press). In praise of clinical judgment: Meehl's forgotten legacy. Journal of Clinical Psychology.
153. Wood, J., & Lilienfeld, S. (1999). The Rorschach Inkblot Test: A case of overstatement? Assessment, 6, 341-349.
154. Wood, J., Lilienfeld, S., Garb, H., & Nezworski, M. (2000). The Rorschach Test in clinical diagnosis: A critical review with a backward look at Garfield (1947). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 395-430.
155. Wood, J., Lilienfeld, S., Nezworski, M., & Garb, H. (2001). Coming to grips with negative evidence for the comprehensive system for the Rorschach: A comment on Gacono, Loving, and Bodholt; Ganellen and Bornstein. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 48-70.
156. Wood, J., Nezworski, M., Garb, H., & Lilienfeld, S. (2001). The misperception of psychopathology: Problems with the norms of the comprehensive system for the Rorschach. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 350-373.
157. Wood, J., Nezworski, M., & Stejskal, W. (1996). The comprehensive system for the Rorschach: A critical examination. Psychological Science, 7, 3-10.
158. Wood, J., Nezworski, M., Stejskal, W., Garven, S., & West, S. (1999). Methodological issues in evaluating Rorschach validity: A comment on Burns and Viglione (1996), Weiner (1996), and Ganellen (1996). Assessment, 6, 115-129.
159. Wood, J., Nezworski, M., Stejskal, W., & McKinzey, R. (2001). Problems of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach in forensic settings: Recent developments. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1, 89-103.
160. Ziskin, J. (1995). Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Law & Psychology.
161. Ziskin, J., & Faust, D. (1988). Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Law & Psychology.